An Evaluation of the Impact of the Cyprus Issue on Turkey-EU Relations

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 51 - 61, 27.12.2022

Yunus Emre Karaca Osman Karacan Fatih Yaşar

Öz

Turkey has shown great interest in the EU since its creation. However, Turkey’s EU accession has become a long and challenging journey. In this journey, various problems and crises have tested the Turkey-EU relationship. The Cyprus Issue is one of them. This study focuses on the impact of the Cyprus Issue on Turkey’s EU accession. The study seeks to answer the research question by using primary and secondary sources, including articles, reports, and written and oral statements of government officials. This study pursues an answer to a question: to what extent is the Cyprus issue significant to Turkey’s accession negotiations with the EU? The study’s main conclusion is that the Cyprus Issue is a significant obstacle to Turkey’s EU accession. There are three main supporting reasons for this conclusion. Firstly, the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC) (the Republic of Cyprus) and Greece have used the Cyprus Issue as leverage, especially after the EU membership of GCASC in 2004, in the EU accession process of Turkey. Secondly, the EU has not adopted an objective position, although the EU has sometimes tried to find a balance position regarding the desires and demands of Turkey and GCASC-Greece. Finally, in addition to the existing problems in the Cyprus Issue, recent developments like the Eastern Mediterranean Crisis have made the Cyprus Issue a significant factor in the EU accession journey of Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkey, European Union, Cyprus Issue

Kaynakça

• Arikan, H. (2003). Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership? Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
• Bache, I. & George, S. (2006). Politics in the European Union. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford UP.
• Bahcheli, T. (2000). Searching for a Cyprus Settlement: Considering Options for Creating a Federation, a Confederation, or Two Independent States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 30(1), 203–216.
• Barnard, F. K. (2004). The Role of Turkish Migration and Migrants in Turkey’s Relations with the EC/EU. In Bal, I. (Ed.) Turkish Foreign Policy in Post-Cold War Era. Florida: Brown Walker Press (181–196).
• BBC (2020a). Sevilla Haritası Nedir?: Yunanistan’ın Tezini Dayandırdığı, ABD’nin ‘Hukuki Önemi Yok’ Dediği Harita. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-54244760 (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• BBC (2020b). AB Zirvesinde Türkiye ve Doğu Akdeniz ile İlgili Hangi Kararlar Alındı?. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-55269631 (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Bogdani, M. (2011). Turkey and the Dilemma of EU Accession. New York: I. B. Tauris.
• Brey, H. (1999). Turkey and the Cyprus Question. The International Spectator, 34(1), 111–121. Cetin, S. (2020). Seville Maritime Territory Map Is Illegitimate: Expert. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/seville-maritime-territory-map-is-illegitimate-expert/1983193 (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Dinan, D. (2010). Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration. 4th edn. London: Palgrave.
• Eralp, A. (1993). Turkey and the European Community in the Changing Post-War International System. In Balkır, C. & Williams, A. M. (Eds.) Turkey and Europe. London: Pinter Publishers (24–44).
• Erciyes, C. (2019). Doğu Akdeniz: Deniz Yetki Alanlarının Sınırlandırılması, Türkiye’nin Siyasi ve Hukuki Tezleri, Sahadaki Uygulamaları. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/dogu-akdeniz-deniz-yetki-alanlarinin-sinirlandirilmasi.pdf (Access Date: 18 July2022).
• European Commission (1998). Regular Report from the Commission on Turkey’s Progress toward Accession, COM (98), Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/candidate-countries/turkey/key_documents_en.htm (Access Date: 1 August 2022).
• European Council (1990). Presidency Conclusions and Annexes, Dublin, 25–26 June, Brussels,
• http://www.european-council.europa.eu/council-meetings/conclusions/archives-1992-1975 (Access Date: 1 August 2022). European Council (1997). Presidency Conclusions, Luxembourg, 12–13 December, Brussels.
• http://www.european-council.europa.eu/council-meetings/conclusions/archives-2002-1993 (Access Date: 1 August 2022).
• European Council (1999). Presidency Conclusions, Helsinki, 10–11 December, Brussels. http://www.european-council.europa.eu/council-meetings/conclusions/archives-2002-1993 (Access Date: 1 August 2022).
• European Council (2002). Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen, 12–13 December, Brussels. http://www.european-council.europa.eu/council-meetings/conclusions/archives-2002-1993 (Access Date: 1 August 2022).
• European Council (2004). Presidency Conclusion, Brussels, 16–17 December. http://www.european-council.europa.eu/council-meetings/conclusions (Access Date: 1 August 2022).
• Faucompret, E. & Konings, J. (2008). Turkish Accession to the EU: Satisfying the Copenhagen Criteria. London: Routledge.
• Grigoriadis, I. N. (2008). Greek and Greek Cypriot Views of Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: On the Endurance of a Spectacular Paradigmatic Shift. In Muftuler-Bac, M. & Stivachtis, A. Y. (Eds.) Turkey-European Union Relations: Dilemmas, Opportunities, and Constraints. Lanham, United States: Lexington Books (151–167).
• Gurel, S. S. (1993). Turkey and Greece: A Difficult Aegean Relationship. In Balkır, C. & Williams, A. M. (Eds.) Turkey and Europe. London: Pinter Publishers (161–190). Hamit, D. (2020). US: Seville Map Has No Legal Significance. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-seville-map-has-no-legal-significance/1980947 (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Hannay, L. (2005). Cyprus: Not Yet a Problem Solved?. In Lake, M. (Ed.) The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research (165–169).
• Kaliber, A. (2012). Turkey’s Cyprus Policy: A Case of Contextual Europeanisation. In Nas, C. & Ozer, Y. (Eds.) Turkey and the European Union: Processes of Europeanisation. Surrey, United Kingdom: Ashgate (225–242). Ker-lindsay, J. (2007). The Policies of Greece and Cyprus towards Turkey’s EU Accession. Turkish Studies, 8(1), 71–83.
• Kinacioglu, M. & Oktay, E. (2006). The Domestic Dynamics of Turkey’s Cyprus Policy: Implications for Turkey’s accession to the European Union. Turkish Studies, 7(2), 261–273.
• Koliopoulos, C. (2008). The Strategic Implications of Turkey’s EU membership. In Muftuler-Bac, M. & Stivachtis, A. Y. (Eds.) Turkey-European Union Relations: Dilemmas, Opportunities, and Constraints. Lanham, United States: Lexington Books.
• Mango, A. (2005). The Modern History of a Solid Country. In Lake, M. (Ed.) The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?. London: The Federal Trust for Education and Research (15–25).
• Mfa (2022a). Dışişleri Bakanı Sayın Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu’nun KKTC Cumhurbaşkanı Derviş Eroğlu İle Birlikte Düzenlediği Ortak Basın Toplantısı, 14 January 2015. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-mevlut-cavusoglu_nun-kktc-cumhurbaskani-dervis-eroglu-ile-birlikte-duzenledigi-ortak-basin-toplantisi_-14.tr.mfa (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Mfa (2022b). No: 58, 28 Şubat 2020, Doğu Akdeniz’deki Sondaj Faaliyetlerimiz Nedeniyle Avrupa Birliği’nin Aldığı Yaptırım Kararına İlişkin Listenin Onaylanması Hk.. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_58_-dogu-akdeniz-sondaj-faaliyetlerimiz-hk.tr.mfa (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Muftuler-Bac, M. & Mclaren, L. (2003). Enlargement Preferences and Policy-Making in the European Union: Impacts on Turkey. European Integration, 25(1), 17–30.
• Muftuler-Bac, M. (1999). The Cyprus Debacle: What the Future Holds. Futures, (31), 559–575.
• Muftuler-Bac, M. (2002). Turkey in the EU’s Enlargement Process: Obstacles and Challenges. Mediterranean Politics, 7(2), 79–95.
• Muftuler-Bac, M. (2008). Turkey’s Accession Negotiations with the European Union: The Long Path Ahead. In Muftuler-Bac, M. & Stivachtis, A. Y. (Eds.) Turkey-European Union Relations: Dilemmas, Opportunities, and Constraints. Lanham, United States: Lexington Books (115–131).
• Nugent, N. (2000). EU Enlargement and the Cyprus Problem. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(1), 131–150.
• Papanicolaou, Y. (2005). Realities and Perspectives: A Greek View on Turkey’s European Ambitions. In Lake, M. (Ed.) The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research (151–163).
• Paul, A. (2015). Turkey-EU Relations: Forever Engaged, Never to be Married?. https://eu.boell.org/en/2015/07/08/turkey-eu-relations-forever-engaged-never-be-married (Access Date: 1 May 2022).
• Sertoglu, K. & Ozturk, I. (2003). Application of Cyprus to the European Union and the Cyprus Problem. Emerging Markets and Finance and Trade, 39(6), 54–70.
• Souter, D. (1984). An Island Apart: A Review of Cyprus Problem. Third World Quarterly, 6(3), 657–674.
• Suvarierol, S. (2003). The Cyprus Obstacle on Turkey’s Road to Membership in the European Union. In
• Carkoglu, A. & Rubin, B. (Eds.) Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Politics, Economic Integration and International Dynamics. London: Frank Cass (55–78).
• Ugur, M. (1999). The European Union and Turkey: An Anchor and Credibility Dilemma. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
• Ulger, İ. K. (2020). Türkiye Mavi Vatanı Savunmaya Devam Ediyor. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/turkiye-mavi-vatani-savunmaya-devam-ediyor/2004480 (Access Date: 18 July 2022).
• Ulusoy, K. (2008). The Europeanisation of Turkey and Its Impact on the Cyprus Problem. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 10(3), 309–329.
• United Nations, General Assembly Resolution 37/253, Question of Cyprus, A/RES/37/253 (16 May 1983). http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/37/a37r253.htm (Access Date: 22 July 2022).
• Yakinthou, C. (2009). The EU’s Role in the Cyprus Conflict: System Failure or Structural Metamorphosis?. Ethnopolitics, 8(3), 307–323.
• Zervakis, P. A. (2002). The Europeanisation of the Cyprus Question: A Model for Conflict Resolution?. Politicka Misao, 39(5), 156–173.