Implementation approaches and strategies in the use of equalizer in music production: A systematic review

Abstract

he equalizer, a fundamental tool in the disciplines of music production and audio engineering, is one of the most important elements that shape the timbral qualities of sound, its perceptual clarity, and its hierarchical balance within the mix. With the proliferation of digital audio processing technologies, access to this tool has become easier, but this technological democratization has also brought about a serious competency problem. When inexperienced users, in particular, use equalizers without the necessary technical and theoretical background, this leads to fundamental production errors such as frequency masking, timbral muddiness, and the loss of natural qualities of the processed sound. The literature demonstrates that amateurs interested in the field experience cognitive difficulties in the face of the complexity presented by digital interfaces and tend to perceive equalizers as a magical tool promising instant solutions. The main motivation for this study is the paucity of academic studies that present a systematic synthesis of technical and practical information found scattered in the relevant literature and transform these elements into teachable pedagogical approaches. The aim of this research is to fill this academic-pedagogical gap. To this end, a systematic review model of qualitative research designs was designed based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. 49 academic and technical documents, selected based on a comprehensive literature review and predetermined criteria, were analyzed through content analysis. The analyses revealed that approaches to equalizer use in the literature can be structured under three fundamental frameworks: a corrective approach aimed at resolving technical issues, a shaping approach aimed at enriching the aesthetic character of sound, and a creative approach that transforms sound into a means of artistic expression. The practical application of each approach is illustrated with schematic diagrams. These frameworks are supported by key concepts from the literature, linking them to the “problem-solving” philosophies of experts such as Owsinski and Senior and the “tone perception” studies of researchers such as Dobrowohl. In conclusion, this research fills an important gap in the field by offering a holistic perspective that removes the use of equalizer, a multi-layered competency, from random trials and makes it more understandable, conscious, and teachable.

Keywords

• equalizer
• music production
• music technology
• signal processors
• sound engineering

Implementation approaches and strategies in the use of equalizer in music production: A systematic review

Abstract

The equalizer, a fundamental tool in the disciplines of music production and audio engineering, is one of the most important elements that shape the timbral qualities of sound, its perceptual clarity, and its hierarchical balance within the mix. With the proliferation of digital audio processing technologies, access to this tool has become easier, but this technological democratization has also brought about a serious competency problem. When inexperienced users, in particular, use equalizers without the necessary technical and theoretical background, this leads to fundamental production errors such as frequency masking, timbral muddiness, and the loss of natural qualities of the processed sound. The literature demonstrates that amateurs interested in the field experience cognitive difficulties in the face of the complexity presented by digital interfaces and tend to perceive equalizers as a magical tool promising instant solutions. The main motivation for this study is the paucity of academic studies that present a systematic synthesis of technical and practical information found scattered in the relevant literature and transform these elements into teachable pedagogical approaches. The aim of this research is to fill this academic-pedagogical gap. To this end, a systematic review model of qualitative research designs was designed based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. 49 academic and technical documents, selected based on a comprehensive literature review and predetermined criteria, were analyzed through content analysis. The analyses revealed that approaches to equalizer use in the literature can be structured under three fundamental frameworks: a corrective approach aimed at resolving technical issues, a shaping approach aimed at enriching the aesthetic character of sound, and a creative approach that transforms sound into a means of artistic expression. The practical application of each approach is illustrated with schematic diagrams. These frameworks are supported by key concepts from the literature, linking them to the “problem-solving” philosophies of experts such as Owsinski and Senior and the “tone perception” studies of researchers such as Dobrowohl. In conclusion, this research fills an important gap in the field by offering a holistic perspective that removes the use of equalizer, a multi-layered competency, from random trials and makes it more understandable, conscious, and teachable.

Keywords

• equalizer
• music production
• music technology
• sound engineering
• signal processors

References

1. Alluri, V., Toiviainen, P., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Glerean, E., Sams, M., & Brattico, E. (2012). Large-scale brain networks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3677–3689. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.019
2. Alm, J. F., & Walker, J. S. (2002). Time- frequency analysis of musical instruments. SIAM Review, 44(3), 457–476. https://doi. org/10.1137/s003614450038222
3. American Psychological Association. (2020).Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7nd ed.). https:// doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
4. Anthony, A. R. (2017). Mixing as a performance: Creati& approaches to the popular music mix process [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hull]. Hull University Research Archive.
5. Aras, T., & Temuçin, S. (2022). Logic yazılımının varsayılan EQ eklentisi ile harici EQ eklentilerinin ses sinyaline olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance, (21), 125-140. https:// doi.org/10.31722/ejmd.998995
6. Başay, V., Coşkun, O., & Yılmaz, G. (2024). Optimization of parametric equalizer filters in in-vehicle audio systems with genetic algorithm. Preprints.org. https://doi. org/10.20944/preprints202406.0447.v1
7. Bo, E., Kostara-Konstantinou, E., Lepore, F., Shtrepi, L., Puglisi, G. E., Mangano, B., Mangano, F., Barkas, N., & Astolfi, A. (2016, July 10–14). Acoustic characterization of the ancient theatre of Tyndaris: Evaluation and proposals for its reuse. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV 2016), Athens, Greece
8. Canyakan, S. (2025). Machine learning in audio mastering: a comparative study. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, 6(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15074948

9. Cartwright, M. B., & Pardo, B. (2013). Social-EQ: Crowdsourcing an equalization descriptor map. Proceedings of the 14th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 395–400.
10. Christensen, K. B. (2003). A generalization of the biquadratic parametric equalizer. 115th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, New York, NY, USA, Paper 5916. Retrieved from https://aes2.org/publications/ elibrary- page/?id=12429
11. Corey, J. (2016). Audio production and critical listening: Technical ear training (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315727813
12. Dewey, C. P. (2014). Towards a new equalisation user interface for mixing multi- track recordings of musical instruments (Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield). University of Huddersfield Repository. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/ eprint/23685
13. Dobrowohl, F. A., Milne, A. J., & Dean, R. T. (2019). Controlling perception thresholds for changing timbres in continuous sounds. Organised Sound, 24(1), 76-88. Duggal, S. (2024). Equalisers. S. Duggal (Ed.), Audio production principles (pp. 133–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 031-40067-4_11
14. Dutilleux, P., Holters, M., Disch, S., & Zölzer, U. (2011). Filters and delays. In U. Zölzer (Ed.), DAFX: Digital Audio Effects (2nd ed., pp. 47–81). John Wiley & Sons.
15. Engel, J., Hantrakul, L., Gu, C., & Roberts, A. (2020). DDSP: Differentiable digital signal processing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (pp. 26–30). International Conference on Learning Representations. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2001.04643
16. Izhaki, R. (2008). Mixing audio: Concepts, practices and tools. Focal Press. ISBN 978-0- 240-52068-1.
17. İmik, H., & Uçar, E. (2024). The effects of holding positions on the frequency response of dynamic vocal microphones. Rast Musicology Journal, 12(4), 375–391. https:// doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20241241
18. Karaçam, Z. (2013). Sistematik Derleme Metodolojisi: Sistematik Derleme Hazırlamak İçin Bir Rehber. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 26-33.
19. Kim, J. S. (2018). A study on vocal EQ’ing method. Journal of the Korea Academia- Industrial cooperation Society, 19(12), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.5762/ KAIS.2018.19.12.569
20. Leyshon, A. (2009). The software slump?: digital music, the democratisation of creativity, and the decline of the recording studio sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(6), 1309–1331. https://doi.org/ 10.1068/a40352
21. Loni, D. Y. (2013). Implementation of music equalization Simulink model on DSK6713. Science Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 2(2), 74-77. https://doi. org/10.11648/j.cssp.20130202.16
22. Mycroft, J., & Paterson, J. (2011). Activity flow in music equalization: The cogniti& and creati& implications of interface design. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 59(1/2), 29–41.
23. Nilsson, L. (2024). Mastering Engineers’ Preferences and Usage of Equalizers in Music Mastering : an Investigation on Application, Sonic Characteristics and Electronic Components (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/ resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-105476
24. Oppenheim, A. V., Schafer, R. W., & Buck, J. R. (1999). Discrete-time signal processing (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-754920-2
25. Owsinski, B. (2017). The mixing engineer’s handbook (4th ed.). Bobby Owsinski Media Group. ISBN 978-0-9888391-9-9
26. Önen, U. (2011). Ses kayıt & müzikteknolojileri (5. bs.). Çitlembik Yayınları.
27. Özkeleş, M., & Arapgirlioğlu, H. (2024). Comparison of analog processors and digital signal processors. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, 5(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10577122
28. Pakarinen, J., Abel, M., Valimaki, V., & Smith, J. (2011). Musical applications of real-time signal processing. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 59(1-2), 12-28.
29. Pasinlioğlu, T., & Pasinlioğlu, K. (2016). Ses uygulamalarında efekt & sinyal işlemciler (1. bs.). Cinius Yayınları. Proakis, J. G., & Manolakis, D. G. (2007).
30. Digital signal processing: Principles, algorithms, and applications (4nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
31. Ramola, J. (2022). A Low-Cost, High- Performance Digital Signal Processor (DSP) for Audio Applications. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.17762/ msea.v71i1.2123
32. Rämö, J., & Välimäki, V. (2014). Optimizing a high-order graphic equalizer for audio processing. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 21(3), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/ LSP.2014.2301557
33. Rämö, J., Välimäki, V., & Bank, B. (2014). High-precision parallel graphic equalizer. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(12), 1894–1904. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TASLP.2014.2354241
34. Rumsey, F., & McCormick, T. (2009). Sound and recording: An introduction (5nd ed.). Focal Press.
35. Sabat, R., Pennec, Y., Lévêque, G., Torrent, D., Ding, C., & Djafari-Rouhani, B. (2022). Single and coupled Helmholtz resonators for low frequency sound manipulation. Journal of Applied Physics, 132, Article 064505. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096630
36. Senior, M. (2019). Mixing secrets for the small studio (2nd ed.) Routledge.
37. Stasis, S., Stables, R., & Hockman, J. (2016). Semantically controlled adapti& equalisation in reduced dimensionality parameter space. Applied Sciences, 6(4), 116. https://doi. org/10.3390/app6040116
38. Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH. (2024). Cubase Pro (Sürüm 14) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.steinberg.net/cubase/
39. Tanyeri, B. (2024). 1990’lardan 21. YY’ın ilk çeyreğine kadar olan süreçte müzik üretimindeki gürlük evrimi. Yegah Musicology Journal (YMJ), 7(4), 916–934. https://doi. org/10.51576/ymd.1583157
40. Uriostegui-Hernandez, D., Posadas-Durán, J. P. F., Gallegos-Funes, F. J., Rosales, A., &lázquez-Lozada, E., Sánchez, L. C., & Miranda-González, A. A. (2025). Method for Resonant Frequency Attenuation in Dynamic Audio Equalizer. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3038. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063038
41. Välimäki V., & Reiss, J. D. (2016). All about audio equalization: Solutions and frontiers. Applied Sciences, 6(5), 129. https://doi. org/10.3390/app6050129
42. Verfaille, V., Arfib, D., Keiler, F., von dem Knesebeck, A., & Zölzer, U. (2011). Adaptive digital audio effects. In U. Zölzer (Ed.), DAFX: Digital Audio Effects (2nd ed, pp. 319–394). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119991298.ch9
43. Wallmark, Z., Frank, R. M., & Ringle, M. (2018). The timbral thread: A study of timbre and articulation in artistic imitation. Musicae Scientiae, 22(3), 365–389.
44. Zölzer, U. (Ed.). (2011). DAFX: Digital audio effects (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
45. Websites Web 1.https://reverb.com/item/12206372- pair-of-langevin-electrodyne-251-a-eq- passive-equalizers-very-rare-selectable- frequencies
46. Web 2. https://matlefflerschulman.com/ articles/a-brief-history-of-my-iti-mep-130- mastering-parametric-equalizer-modules
47. Web 3. Spotify Audio Labs. (2024). Culture Next 2024: The trends report. Spotify. https://ads.spotify.com/en-AU/culture- next/gen-z-trends-report/
48. Web 4. FabFilter. (2025). FabFilter Pro-Q 4 user manual. https://www.fabfilter.com/ help/pro-q/using
49. Web 5. Mellor, D. (1995, Nisan). EQ: How ve when to use it. Sound On Sound. https:// www.soundonsound.com/techniques/eq- how-when-use-it
50. Web 6.PRISMA 2020 bildirisi. https://www. prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020
51. Web Scaler EQ Manual. (t.y.). Scaler EQ Manual. https://scalermusic.com/products/ scaler-eq