Many phrases used in education policy discussions are very vague. They are fluid signifiers that everybody can interpret and understand in their own way. They are useful when building political consensus or affirmation.
But the phrases are often too vague when trying to communicate and understand educa-tion and educational leadership because they obscure the elements in the phrase: who is the political agent, and what are the relations between policy, research, school and staff. They also hide the purposes of schooling, and the societal values and power in
the turna-round of political interests from education towards governance that are implicit in the ‘as skilled as they can be.’ It could have said as knowledgeable or as enlightened or autono-mous as they can be. These are some of the fundamental phenomena in education and leadership, and they seem to be forgotten.
With this special issue we want to put critical analyses into the centre of research again as we analyse some of the dilemmas and conflicts between remembered and forgotten in-sights in education research on policy, society, schools and educational leadership, and thus between diverse and often conflicting interpretations of – what is fundamental in Nordic contexts: Danish, Finnish, Islandic, Norwegian and Swedish – school leadership re-search
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Bölüm | Articles |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 2 Ekim 2020 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 |