Research Article

Adaptation After Covid-19 Scale: The Study of Validity And Reliability

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 31, 2021
EN

Adaptation After Covid-19 Scale: The Study of Validity And Reliability

Abstract

This study aims to conduct validity and reliability studies of the Adaptation After COVID-19 Scale (AACS) to measure adults’ perceptions of adapting to life after COVID-19. The research study group consists of 2,042 adults who were accessed in July 2020 using convenience sampling. Half of this group was used in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other half in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). As a result of the two-step EFA analysis conducted in the validity studies, the scale was revealed to have 18 items with two factors explaining 50.37% of the total variance whose eigen values are greater than 1.00. However, because the difference between the first factor and the second factor is very large (42.68%), the scale has been evaluated as having one factor. In the second study group for the CFA after the modification procedures, the model showed good fit ( = 3.62; p <.001), and the other fit-indices of the model (RMSEA = .06; RMR = .05; NFI = .96; CFI = .97; GFI = .96; AGFI = .92) were found to be within acceptable ranges. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach’s alpha of internal consistency has been determined as α = .94, the Guttman variable as G = .97; Spearman-Brown predicted reliability as SB = .97; split-half reliability as r1-2 = .94; and test-retest reliability as r = .87. As a result, the study reveals the AACS to be acceptable as a valid and reliable scale.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C. Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal Of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8
  2. Alpar, R. (2020). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler [Applied multivariate statistical methods]. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  3. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods in social sciences] (3rd ed.). Adapazarı: Seçkin Yayınları.
  4. Armutlulu, İ. H. (2008). İşletmelerde uygulamalı istatistik [Applied statistics in business]. İstanbul, Alfa Yayınları.
  5. Bayram, N. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş [Introduction to structural equation modeling]. Bursa, Ezgi yayınları.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme [Questinaire development]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi [The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences], 3(2), 133-151.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: istatistik, araştırma deseni, spss uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: statistics, research design, spss applications and interpretation]. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
  8. Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287, 112934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

October 25, 2021

Acceptance Date

December 6, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Canel, A., & Otrar, M. (2021). Adaptation After Covid-19 Scale: The Study of Validity And Reliability. Research on Education and Psychology, 5(2), 324-349. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1014632

17908

All the articles published in REP are licensed with "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License"