The Relationship Between Modern Art and Children's Painting in The Context of The New Visual Perception Theory

Abstract

Art has been the only shelter for artists against the alienation that came with Modernism, which covers a hundred-year period between 1860-1960. In modern art, instead of classical art rules, it is seen that the surface, form and color are given importance in painting with the desire to reach the new, and basic forms gain value in line with the desire to reach the essence. However, children's pictures have broken these rules as an innate feature. However, children's pictures have broken these rules as an innate feature. Recognizing that children paint objects as they perceive, not as a representational reality, and that they follow a very original way while doing this, caused children's paintings to be a source for modern art. Along with modern art, Manet deferred form by chasing light in the open air, and did not refrain from deforming Cezanne forms with the help of geometric forms. The forms used in modern art, where the depth is reduced to two dimensions on the surface, are no longer imitating nature. For painters who chose the path of conveying their spiritual experiences and pure emotional intensities by moving away from the reality of the world seen in modern art, children's paintings included a unique and rich visual language that took them to a metaphysical universe. The aim of this research is to emphasize the effect of children's painting on modern art by revealing similarities between children's paintings and the works of artists such as Gris, Kandinsky, Klee, Cezanne and Chirico, who are among the important names of Modern Art.

Keywords

• Art education
• Children
• Cubism
• Modern art
• Visual perception

References

1. Antmen, A. (2010), 20. yüzyıl sanat akımları, [20th century art movements], İstanbul: Sel Publication.
2. Aytaç, K. (2006). Çağdaş eğitim akımları, [Contemporary education trends], Ankara: Mevsimsiz Publication.
3. Boring, Edwin, G. (1950). History of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
4. Braque, G. (2021). https://www.kunstmuseumbern.ch/en/see/collection/videos-higlights-collection/georges-braque-houses- in-lestaque-268.html. Accessed: 24.06.2021.
5. Christman, R. J. (1971). Sensory experience. London: Intext Edu. Pr.
6. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Clatworthy, S., Simon, K., & Tiedeman, M. (1999). Child drawing: hospital-an ınstrument designed to measure the emotional status of hospitalized school-aged children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14(1), s. 2-9.

9. Clowes, M. (1971). On seeing things. Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), s.79–116.
10. Costall, A. (2001) Introduction and notes to g.h. luquet’s children’s drawings (‘le dessin enfantin’), Translation And Commentary by A. Costall. London and New York: Free Association Books.
11. Cox, M. (1992). Children's drawings. New York: Penguin Books.
12. Denvır, B. (1989). Fauvism and expressionism. In D. Britt (Ed.), Modern Art: Impressionism to Postmodernism, s.109-157. London: Thames & Hudson.
13. Dilmaç, O. (2018). Çocuk sanatının tarihi. [History of children's art], Ankara: Pegem Academy.
14. Felix Klee Collection. https://www.ancientsculpturegallery.com/paul-klee-oil-painting-9929.html. Accessed: 26.06.2021.
15. Fineberg, J. (1997). The innocent eye: children’s art and the modern artist. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
16. Fişek, G., O. & Yıldırım, S., M. (1998). Çocuk gelişimi. [Child development]. Ankara: National Education Publication.
17. Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://www.ancientsculpturegallery.com/paul-klee-oil-painting-9929.html. Accessed, 26.06.2021.
18. İşler, A. Ş. (2004). Çocuk resmi, ilkel sanat ve 20. yüzyılın başındaki öncü sanat anlayışları arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between children's painting, primitive art and pioneering art at the beginning of the 20th century]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Uludağ Universtiy Faculty of Education]. 17(1), s. 53-64.
19. Janson, H. W., Janson, A. (1997). History of Art. New York: Abrams.
20. Karakaş, S., & Bekçi, B. (2003). Zihin/davranış ile beden/organizma ilişkilerini ele alan bilim dallarının doğuşu ve gelişimi. [The birth and development of the branches of science dealing with mind/behavior and body/organism relations]. NeuroQuantology, 2(1), s. 232-265.
21. Kırışoğlu, O. T. (2005). Sanatta eğitim, görmek öğrenmek yaratmak, [Education in art, seeing, learning, creating]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
22. Klee, P. (2007). Modern sanat üzerine. [On modern art ], İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Publication.
23. Kümmerling-Meibauer, B. (2013). Childhood and modernist art. Libri & Liberi, 2(1), s. 11-28.
24. Macdonald, S. (1970). The history and philosophy of art education, England: Lutterworth Press.
25. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational ınvestigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
26. MOMA. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/35572. Accessed: 26.06.2021
27. New York Museum of Modern Art. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/35572 Accessed: 26.06.2021
28. O’Brien, D. (2018). Cubism and Kant. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 10, 482– 506.
29. Soby, J. T. (1966). Giorgio de Chirico. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
30. Reith, E. (1988). The development of use of contour lines in children’s drawings of figurative and non-figurative three-dimensional models. Archives de Psychologie, 56, 83–103.
31. Strauss, M. (2007). Understanding children’s drawings. Hillside, Forest Row: Rudolf Steiner Press.
32. Şahindokuyucu, M. (1997). Bir kavram olarak ‘modernizm’ ve resim sanatına etkileri. ['Modernism' as a concept and its effects on painting] ( Master’s thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University Bolu) Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
33. Toomela, A. (2002). Drawing as a verbally mediated activity: a study of relationships between verbal, motor, and visuospatial skills and drawing in children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(3), s.193-201.
34. Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation: New principles in the analysis of pictures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Willats, J. (2008). Making sense of children’s drawings. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Williats, J. (2006). Rudolf Arnheim’s graphic equivalents in children’s drawings and drawings and paintings by Paul Klee. Liliana Albertazzi, (Ed.), Visual thought: the depictive space of perception, p.204-235. London: John Benjamins Publishing.