Thematic Analysis of Studies on Interdisciplinary Approach in Mathematics Education in Türkiye

Abstract

This study analyses recent articles published in Türkiye on interdisciplinary approaches in mathematics education, focusing on publication trends, aims, methods, samples, data analysis techniques, findings, and recommendations to provide valuable research insights. In the study, 49 articles originating from Türkiye were searched in TR index, Google Scholar, DergiPark, Scopus and WoS databases and examined by thematic analysis method. As a result of the study, it is seen that articles have been published in the relevant field since 2005, the number of publications has been increasing since 2017, and the highest number of publications was published in 2021. When these studies were examined in terms of their aims, they generally aimed to improve students' problem solving, critical thinking and mathematical thinking skills. In terms of their aims, explanatory studies were mostly preferred according to research types. In terms of levels, intervention studies were mostly preferred according to research types. In terms of research methods, case study design from qualitative research methods was mostly preferred. The sample groups consisted mostly of secondary school students. The results of the articles analysed in this study shows that interdisciplinary approaches are an effective method to increase students' skills and attitudes in mathematics education.

Keywords

• Interdisciplinary approach
• Mathematics education
• Thematic analysis

References

1. Altan, A., & Bahadır, E. (2023). Studies about EIN (education information network) in mathematics education in Türkiye: A thematic rewiev. Journal of National Education, 52(239), 1751-1786.
2. Arslan, S. & Arslan, A. S. (2015). Öğretim mühendisliği, öğretim tasarımı ve öğretim deneyi [Instructional engineering, instructional design and instructional experiment]. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler [Theories in Mathematics Education]. (p.917-936). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
3. Arslan, G. B., Kızılay, E., & Hamalosmanoğlu, M. (2022). Examining the researches in Türkiye on technology integration in education. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(1), 39-55.
4. Aslan-Tutak, F. (2020). Matematik Eğitiminde Disiplinlerarası Etkinlikler ve STEM Eğitimi [Interdisciplinary Activities in Mathematics Education and STEM Education]. Dede, Y., Doğan, M. F., ve Aslan-Tutak, F. (Edt.), Matematik Eğitiminde Etkinlikler ve Uygulamaları [Activities and Applications in Mathematics Education]. (p. 97-123). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
5. Aşık, G., & Yılmaz, Z. (2017). Design-based research and teaching experiment methods in mathematics education: differences and similarities. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(2), 343-367.
6. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36: 258-267.
7. Bahadır, E., & Karakuş, N. (2017). Application of the activity of substitution cipher in the ottoman Turkish texts and evaluation of its relation with mathematics. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(4), 23-46.
8. Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM education: Innovations and research, 12(5), 24-37.

9. Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2018). Sistematik derleme çalışmalarında betimsel içerik analizi [The descriptive content analysis in systematic review studies]. K. Beycioğlu, N. Özer & Y. Kondakçı (Eds.), Eğitim yönetiminde araştırma [Research in Educational Administration]. (p.511-532). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Bircan, M. A., & Çalışıcı, H. (2022). The effects of STEM education activities on fourth grade students' attitudes to stem, 21st-century skills and mathematics success. Education and Science, 47(211), 87-119.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2021). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Uygulama [Scientific Research Methods: Pattern and Application]. (30th Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Edition). London: Routledge Falmer.
13. Coşkun, S. B., & Altun, S. (2011). The effect of interdisciplinary approach on students’ critical thinking dispositions at 8th grade mathematics lessons. Education Sciences, 6(1), 283-293.
14. Coşkun, S. B., & Altun, S. (2012). The Effect of the Implementation of Interdisciplinary Approach in 8th Grade Lessons of Mathematics on Mathematical Achievement of Students. Kalem International Journal of Education and Human Sciences, 2(2), 91-122.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Eğitim Araştırmaları: Nicel ve Nitel Araştırmanın Planlanması, Yürütülmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi [Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research]. (H. Ekşi, Translator). İstanbul: EDAM Yayıncılık.
16. Czerniak, C. M., Weber Jr, W. B., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421-430.
17. Çakır, R., & Ozan, C. E. (2018). The effect of STEM applications on 7th grade students’ academic achievement, reflective thinking skills and motivations. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(3), 1077-1100.
18. Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ebenezer, J.V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50.
19. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38.
20. Çınar, S., & Çiftçi, M. (2016, May). Content analysis of studies on interdisciplinary STEM approach. International Computer Technologies Symposium (p.1031-1038). Rize, Türkiye. Abstract retrieved from https://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/dosya/0oBkq.pdf
21. Çibik, N. F., & Boz-Yaman, B. (2024). The Effect of a Cross-Curricular Course on Pre-Service Teachers’ Sustainable Development Attitudes and Mathematical Modeling Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(6), 1-24.
22. Derin, G. &. Aydın, E. (2020). The influence of STEM- mathematical modeling ıntegration on problem solving and modeling skills in mathematics teacher education. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 37, 93-121.
23. Erdem, Z. Ç., Doğan, M. F., & Gürbüz, R. (2021). Investigation of Middle School Students' Interdisciplinary Mathematical Modeling Skills. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(4), 1763-1788.
24. European Commission. (2019). Supporting teacher and school leader careers: A policy guide. Publications Office of the European Union.
25. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1932). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education (7th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: recent developments and future directions. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199-1217.
27. Güder, Y., & Gürbüz, R. (2017). Teaching concepts through ınterdisciplinary modeling problem: Energy conservation problem. Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 1101-1120.
28. Güder, Y., Gürbüz, R., & Gülburnu, M. (2024). Investigation of emerging mathematical leadership in mathematics classroom: application of ınterdisciplinary mathematical modeling. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 119-147.
29. Gürbüz, R., Çalık, M., Çelik, D., Doğan, M. F., & Çavuş Erdem, Z. (2019). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a learning environment through mathematical modeling: Interdisciplinary transition [Project No: 117K169]. Adıyaman University Faculty of Education, Department of Primary Education. TÜBİTAK SOBAG. retrieved from https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/620673
30. Gündoğdu, N. S., & Piskin Tunç, M. (2022). Improving Middle School Students' Proportional Reasoning through STEM Activities. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 164-185.
31. IEA. (2023). TIMSS 2023 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
32. İnan, E., & Uyangör, S. M. (2022). A Thematic analysis of theses prepared on mathematics education with gifted and talented students in Türkiye. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 19-40.
33. Jacobs, H.H. (1989). The growing need for in- terdisciplinary curriculum content. H.H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Eurrieulum: Design And Implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
34. Jankvist, U. T., Rørbech, H., & Bremholm, J. (2021). An interdisciplinary rendezvous between mathematics and literature: Reflections on beauty as a perspective in comparative disciplinary didactics and a thematic approach to interdisciplinary work in upper secondary school. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 11(2), 123-147.
35. Kabar, M. G. D. (2023). A thematic review of quadratic equation studies in the field of mathematics education. Participatory Educational Research, 10(4), 29-48.
36. Kurtuluş, A., Akçay, A. O., & Karahan, E. (2017). Teachers’ vıews on STEM educatıon ın secondary mathematıcs classes. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 6(4), 354-360.
37. Kızılay, E., Kırmızıgül, A. S., & Çevik, M. (2023). The impact of technology-supported interdisciplinary integration on critical thinking and creativity: The perspective of pre-service teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 247-265.
38. Leahey, L. K. (1999). An interdisciplinary approach to integratedcurriculum. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Rowan University, ABD.
39. Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 51, 869-884.
40. Ministry of National Education [MEB]. (2024). Middle School The Türkiye Century Maarif Model Mathematics Curriculum. Ministry of National Education, Board of Education and Discipline., Ankara, Türkiye.
41. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030 framework (p. 25). OECD Publishing. Özarslan, F., & Özcan, B. N. (2021). A content analysis of the joint studies in mathematics and science education in Türkiye. Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Techonology Education, 5(1), 18-36.
42. Özkaya, A., Bulut, S., & Şahin, G. (2023). The effect of interdisciplinary mathematical modeling activities on pre-service teachers' mathematical thinking skills and mathematical literacy. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(4), 634-650.
43. Özkök, A. (2005). Effects of ınterdıscıplınary creatıve problem solvıng teachıng program on creatıve problem solving skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(28), 159-167.
44. Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2011). Real World Research (4th Edition). Wiley.
45. Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary Research: Process And Theory (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications.
46. Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods For Analysing Talk, Text And İnteraction. London: SAGE.
47. TÜSİAD. (2017). Towards 2023: The Need for STEM in Türkiye. Turkish Industry and Business Association.
48. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
49. Ültay, N. & Çalık, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 686-701 DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9357-5
50. Wang, X., He, H., Li, P., & Zhang, L. (2019, August). Research on the disciplinary evolution of deep learning and the educational revelation. In 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (p. 655-660). IEEE.
51. Williams, J., & Roth, W.M. (2016). Introduction to Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. B. Ferri & P. Drake (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education: The State of the Art and Beyond (p.13-34). Cham: Springer.
52. Williams, J., Roth, W.M., Swanson, D., Doig, B., Groves, S., Omuvwie, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education: State Of The Art. Cham: Springer.
53. Yerdelen-Damar, S., Aksöz, B., Sezer, S., Arabacı, N., & Arıkan, F. (2021). Investigating the Interrelationships among Science and Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes towards STEM, and Gender. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(2), 342-357.
54. Yıldırım, A. (1996). The Concept of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Its Implications for Curricula. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 12, 89–94.
55. Yılmaz, K. (2021). Systematic review, meta evaluation, and bibliometric analysis in social sciences and educational sciences. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 10(2), 1457-1490.