Predictive Relationship between Adolescents’ Spritual Well-Being and Perceived Social Support: The Role of Values

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 37 - 46, 01.06.2018

Zeynep Şimşir Tolga Seki , Bülent Dilmaç

Abstract

The aim of this research is to reveal predictive relationships between adolescents’ values, spiritual well-being, and perceived social support, and to test a model that originated from these relationships. This research was conducted with the survey model. The sample of the research consisted of a total of 470 students (302 female and 98 male) studying at religious high schools in Konya in 2016-2017 academic year. Participants were between the ages of 14-17 and the mean age is is 15.80. In the study, “Human Values Scale”, “Spiritual WellBeing Scale” and “Perceived Social Support Scale” were used. Data were analized using structural equation model with AMOS 19 software. According to the findings obtained from the research; the values that adolescents owned directly predicted spiritual well-being. Additionally, the values directly predicted the level of perceived social support. Implications of these results were discussed within the context of literature

Keywords

Values • Spiritual well-being • Perceived social support • Adolescents

References

• Arı, R. (2008). Eğitim psikolojisi [Education psychology]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınclık.
• Başaran, İ. E. (1998). Eğitim psikolojisi [Education psychology]. Ankara: Aydan Web Tesisleri.
• Bergin, A. E. (1991). Values and religious issues in psychotherapy and mental health. American Psychologist, 46(4), 394-403.
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303-316.
• Brooks, C. W., & Matthews, C. O. (2000). The relationship among substance abuse counselors' spiritual well‐ being, values, and self-actualizing characteristics and the impact on clients' spiritual well-being. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 21(1), 23-33.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136- 136.
• Budak, S. (2000). Psikoloji sözlüğü [Psychology dictionary]. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
• Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American psychologist, 59(8), 676.
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310.
• Çeçen, A. R. (2008). Öğrencilerinin cinsiyetlerine ve anababa tutum algılarına göre yalnızlık ve sosyal destek düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of levels of loneliness and social support according to students' gender and parental attitude perceptions]. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(3), 415-431.
• Deniz, M., Dilmac, B., & Hamarta, E. (2016). Values as predictors of teacher trainees' self-esteem and perceived social support. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 3(1), 63-76.
• Dilmaç, B. (2007). Bir grup fen lisesi öğrencisine verilen insani değerler eğitiminin insani değerler ölçeği ile sınanması [The assesment of the teaching of humane values which are imposed a group of science high school students by humane values scale] (Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Dilmaç, B., Deniz, & M., Deniz, M. E. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öz-anlayışları ile değer tercihlerinin incelenmesi [Examination of values and preferences of university students]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi [Journal of Values Education], 7(18), 9-24.
• Doğan, T. (2008). Psikolojik belirtilerin yordayıcısı olarak sosyal destek ve iyilik hali [Social support and well- being as a predictor of psychological symptoms]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi [Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance], 3(30), 30-44.
• Eker, D., & Arkar, H. (1995). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği [Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Journal of Turkish Psychology], 10(34), 45-55.
• Ekşi, H., & Kardaş, S. (2017). Spiritual well-being: Scale development and validation. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 2, 73–88. doi: 10.12738/spc.2017.1.0022
• Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theoloy, 114, 330-340.
• Ellison, L. (2006). A review of the spiritual well-being scale. News Notes, 44(1), 1-10.
• Goodwin, R., & Giles, S. (2003). Social support provision and cultural values in Indonesia and Britain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 240-245.
• Goodwin, R., Costa, P., & Adonu, J. (2004). Social support and its consequences: Positive and deficiency values and their implications for support and self-esteem. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 465-474.
• Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the spiritual well-being. Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1975-1991.
• Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169-202.
• Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Two important distinctions in social support: Kind of support and perceived versus