Research Article

THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 30, 2017
EN

THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS

Abstract

Purpose- The aim of this study is to determine the effects of organizational justice perception on cyber-loafing behaviors.

Method - Data were collected  (233) from health care workers who agreed to participate in the study using the questionnaire method.

These 233 health workers are working in Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Cumhuriyet University Health Services Research and Implementation Hospital, Sivas Numune Hospital) and Family Health Centers in the city center of Sivas. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 program with percentile distribution, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis.

Findings- In the study was determined the negative effect of the operational justice dimension on insignificant cyber-loafing. Moreover, it has been determined that the dimension of interactionel justice has a positive effect on insignificant cyber-loafing behavior.

Conclusion- Positive or negative perception of organizational justice does not cause an increase or decrease in important cyber-loafing behaviors. 

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadi, H., Bagheri, F., Ebrahimi, SA., Rokni, MAN., Kahreh, MS. 2011, “Deviant Work Behavior: Explaining Relationship between Organizational Justice and Cyber-Loafing as a Deviant Work Behavior”, American Journal of Scientific Research, 24,pp.103-116.
  2. Blanchard, A. L. & Henle, CA. 2008, “Correlates of Different Forms of Cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.24, no.3, pp. 1067-1084.
  3. Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S. 1986, “Interactional justice: Commu-nication criteria of fairness”. In R. J. Lewicki, B H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations,, pp. 43-55.
  4. Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. 2002, “Explaining injustice: The Interactive Effect of Explanation and Outcome on Fairness Perceptions and Task Motivation”, Journal of Management, vol.28, no. 5, pp. 591-610.
  5. Cropanzano R. and Greenberg J. 1997, Chapter to appear in C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.). Iptematjonal Review of Industrial and Orpnizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Eivazi, K. 2011, “Computer Use Monitoring and Privacy at Work”, Computer Law & Security Review, vol.27, no.5, pp. 516-523.
  7. Forret, M. & Love, M. S. 2008, “Employee Justice Perception and Coworker Relationship”. Leaderships & Organization Development, vol.29, no. 3, pp.248-260.
  8. Greenberg, J. 1990, “Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of management, vol.16, no. 2, pp.399-432.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2017

Submission Date

June 12, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Alper Ay, F., Demirel, G., & Erbas, N. (2017). THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717
AMA
1.Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. 2017;4(3):400-409. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717
Chicago
Alper Ay, Ferda, Gulbahtiyar Demirel, and Nuriye Erbas. 2017. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 (3): 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
EndNote
Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N (September 1, 2017) THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 3 400–409.
IEEE
[1]F. Alper Ay, G. Demirel, and N. Erbas, “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”, RJBM, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 400–409, Sept. 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
ISNAD
Alper Ay, Ferda - Demirel, Gulbahtiyar - Erbas, Nuriye. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4/3 (September 1, 2017): 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
JAMA
1.Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. 2017;4:400–409.
MLA
Alper Ay, Ferda, et al. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 4, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 400-9, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
Vancouver
1.Ferda Alper Ay, Gulbahtiyar Demirel, Nuriye Erbas. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. 2017 Sep. 1;4(3):400-9. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annually and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.