Hemşirelerin Sosyal Sermaye Durumlarının Sağlık Hizmetlerine Etkileri

An Erratum to this article was published on January 3, 2025. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sabd/article/1612329

Abstract

Sosyal sermaye, bireyler arasındaki etkileşimlerle yapılandırılan; ilişkisel ağ, karşılıklı güven, saygı, ortak anlayış ve sosyal ağlar gibi sosyal ilişkileri ifade eder. Hemşireler, bu bağlamda hastalarla, diğer sağlık profesyonelleriyle ve toplumla etkileşimde bulunarak sosyal sermaye oluşturabilirler. İş yeri sosyal sermayesi, çalışanların iş yerinde etkin olabilmeleri için var olan kaynaklardan yararlanmalarına imkan sağlayan, çalışma ortamındaki sosyal kaynakları ifade eder. Hemşirelerin sosyal sermayesi, sağlık hizmetlerinde önemli bir faktördür. Hemşirelerin sosyal sermaye durumları, daha iyi iletişim, destek ve iş birliği sağlayarak sağlık hizmetlerinin daha etkili, hasta odaklı ve sürdürülebilir olmasına katkı sağlar. Ayrıca, sosyal destek ağına sahip hemşireler, iş stresiyle başa çıkmada daha etkili olabilir, bu da genel sağlık hizmetlerine olumlu bir katkı sağlar. Çalışma ortamlarının psikolojik yönlerini incelemek için kullanılan nispeten yeni bir kavram olan iş yeri sosyal sermayesi, hemşirelerin mesleki bağlılığı ile iş tatminini, kanıta dayalı hemşirelik uygulamalarını, bakım kalitesini, klinik risk yönetimini ve hasta güvenliğini olumlu yönde arttırabilir. Bu nedenle, hemşirelerin sosyal sermayesi, sağlık hizmetlerindeki önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu makalede, hemşirelerin sosyal sermayesi ve sağlık hizmetlerine etkisi incelenmiştir.

Keywords

• Hemşire
• sağlık hizmeti
• sosyal sermaye

Healthcare Impacts of Nurses’ Social Capital Status

An Erratum to this article was published on January 3, 2025. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sabd/article/1612329

Abstract

Social capital refers to social relationships that are structured by interactions between individuals, such as relational networks, mutual trust, respect, common understanding, and social networks. In this context, nurses can create social capital by interacting with patients, other healthcare professionals, and the community. Workplace social capital refers to the social resources in the work environment that enable employees to be effective. Nurses’ social capital is an important factor in healthcare services. Nurses’ social capital status contributes to more effective, patient-centered, and sustainable healthcare services by providing better communication, support, and collaboration. Additionally, nurses with a social support network can cope with work stress more effectively, which contributes positively to overall healthcare services. The relatively new concept of workplace social capital, which is used to examine the psychological aspects of work environments, can increase nurses’ professional commitment, job satisfaction, evidence-based nursing practices, care quality, clinical risk management, and patient safety. Therefore, nurses’ social capital emphasizes the importance of healthcare services. In this article, nurses’ social capital and its impact on healthcare services are examined.

Keywords

• Nurse
• health care
• social capital.

References

1. Tiryaki Ö, Doğu Ö, Hafızoğlu T. Plasenta ve umbilikal kordon hakkında ebelere verilen eğitimin değerlendirilmesi. Perinatoloji Dergisi. 2017; 25(2): 64-70.
2. Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 8: CD003248. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub3.
3. Mcdonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7: CD004074. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3.
4. Kim AJ, Warren JB. Optimal timing of umbilical cord clamping: The debate settled? Part 1 of 2: History, rationale, influencing factors and concerns. Neo Reviews. 2015; 16: e263. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.16-5-e263.
5. Garabedian C, Rakza T, Drumez E, Poleszczuk M, Ghesquiere L, Wibaut B, et al. Benefits of delayed cord clamping in red blood cell alloimmunization. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(3): e20153236. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3236.
6. who.int [Internet]. World Health Organization (WHO) Guideline: Delayed umbilical cord clamping for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 [Updated: 2014; Cited: 05.03.2018]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148793/9789241508209_eng.pdf.%2015%20%20ubat%202018;jsessionid=3FE6250A2D7FBC7927383258AA4CC775?sequence=1.
7. aap.org [Internet]. American Academy of Pediatrics/ American Heart Association, Summary of the revised neonatal resuscitation guidelines [Updated: 2015; Cited: 02.03. 2018]. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/nrp_newsletter _2015_fallwinter.pdf.
8. rcog.org.uk [Internet]. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Clamping of the umbilical cord and placental transfusion [Updated: 2015; Cited: 02.03.2018]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk /en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/sip14/.

9. midwife.org [Internet]. American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM), Delayed umbilical cord clamping. Position statement [Updated: 2014; Cited: 02.03. 2018]. Available from: http://www.midwife. org/ACNM/files/ACNMLibraryData/UPLOADFILENAME/000000000290/Delayed-Umbilical-Cord-Clamping-May-2014.pdf.
10. neonatology.org.tr [Internet]. Doğum salonu yönetimi rehberi [Son güncelleme tarihi: 2016; Erişim tarihi: 02.03.2018]. Erişim adresi: http://www.neonatology.org.tr/wcontent/uploads/2016/12/dogum_odasi_yonetimi.pdf.
11. acog.org [Internet]. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Committee opinion, Number 684 [Internet]. Washington: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017 [Updated: 2017; Cited: 02.03.2018]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co687.pdf.
12. Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Vohr BR, Tucker RJ, Parker AB, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion on neonatal and 18 month outcomes in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2016; 168: 50-5. e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds. 2015.09.068.
13. KC A, Målqvist M, Rana N, Ranneberg LJ, Andersson O. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on anaemia at 8 and 12 months and later neurodevelopment in late pre-term and term infants; a facility-based, randomized controlled trial in Nepal. BMC Pediatrics. 2016; 16: 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0576-z.
14. ICEA. Delyed cord clamping [Internet]. Morrisville: International Childbirth Education Association, 2015 [Updated: 2015; Cited: 18.04.2018]. Available from: http://icea.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Delayed_ Cord_Clamping_PP.pdf.
15. who.int [Internet]. World Health Organization (WHO), Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 [Updated: 2012; Cited: 05.03.2018]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/75411/1/9789241548502_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1.
16. Uwins C, Hutchon DJR. Delayed umbilical cord clamping after childbirth: Potential benefits to baby’s health. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics. 2014; 2014(5): 161-71
17. Katheria AC, Lakshminrusimha S, Rabe H, Mcadams R, Mercer JS. Placental transfusion: A Review. Journal of Perinatology. 2017; 37(2): 105-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.151.
18. Madhavanprabhakaran GK, Wittmann AL, Vaidyanathan G, Aldughaishi T, Thomas DS. Knowledge and practice of umbilical cord clamping among maternity care providers. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2018; 6(3): 1311-8. https://doi.org/10.22038/JMRH.2018.23553.1252.
19. Jelin AC, Kuppermann M, Erickson K, Clyman R, Schulkin J. Obstetricians’ attitudes and beliefs regarding umbilical cord clamping. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2014; 27(14): 1457-61. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.864275.
20. Andersson O, Hellstrom-Westas L, Andersson D, Domellof M. Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011; 343: d7157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7157.
21. Van Rheenen P, De Moor L, Eschbach S, De Grooth H, Brabin B. Delayed cord clamping and haemoglobin levels in infancy: A randomised controlled trial in term babies. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2007; 12(5): 603-15.
22. Mercer J, Erickson-Owens DA, Collins J, Barcelos MO, Parker AB, Padbury JF. Effects of delayed cord clamping on residual placental blood volume, hemoglobin and bilirubin levels in term infants: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Perinatology. 2017; 37(3): 260-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.222.
23. Vain NE, Satragno DS, Gorenstein AN, Gordillo JE, Berazategui JP, Alda MG, et al. Effect of gravity on volume of placental transfusion: A multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014; 384(9939): 235-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000469493. 05128.ba.
24. who.int [Internet]. World Health Organization (WHO), Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord to reduce infant anaemia. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 [Updated: 2013; Cited: 05.03.2018]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris /bitstream/10665/120074/1/WHO_RHR_14.19_eng.pdf.
25. Farrar D, Airey R, Law GR, Tuffnell D, Cattle B, Duley L. Measuring placental transfusion for term births: Weighing babies with cord intact. BJOG. 2011; 118(1): 70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010. 02781.x.
26. who.int [Internet]. World Health Organization (WHO), Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008 [Updated: 2008; Cited: 05.03.2018]. Available from: http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43894/1/9789241596657_eng.pdf.
27. Çakır Eren E. Çocuklarda yaş gruplarına ve cinslerine göre anemi ve demir eksikliği anemisi sıklığının incelenmesi [Uzmanlık Tezi]. İstanbul: Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Aile Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı; 2008.
28. Andersson O, Lindquist B, Lindgren M, Stjernqvist K, Domellöf M, Hellströmwestas L. Effect of delayed cord clamping on neurodevelopment at 4 years of age: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(7): 631-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015 .0358.
29. Bolstridge J, Bell T, Dean B, Mackley A, Moore G, Swift C, et al. A quality improvement initiative for delayed for delayed umbilical cord clamping in very low-birthweight infants. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16: 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0692-9.
30. Ceriani Cernadas JM. Timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017; 115(2): 188-94. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2017.eng.188.
31. Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossley KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, et al. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol. 2013; 591: 2113-26. https://doi.org/ 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.250084.
32. Ceriani Cernadas JM. Stem cell transfer in newborn infants through placental transfusion via delayed umbilical cord clamping. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016; 114(6): 498-9. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2016.eng.498.
33. Kanmaz Kutman HG, Oğuz Ş, Uraş N. Altın dakikalar: Prematüre bebeğin doğum salonunda yönetimi. Jinekoloji - Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Derg. 2015; 12(4): 162-6.
34. Katheria AC, Wozniak M, Harari D, Arnell K, Petruzzelli D, Finer NF. Measuring cardiac changes using electrical Impedance during delayed cord clamping: A feasibility trial. Maternal Health, Neonatology, and Perinatology. 2015; 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-015-0016-3.
35. Backes CH, Huang H, Iams JD, Bauer JA, Giannone PJ. Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants born at 22 through 27 weeks’ gestation. J Perinatol. 2016; 36(1): 35-40. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.117.
36. De Paco C, Herrera J, Garcia C, Corbalán S, Arteaga A, Pertegal M, et al. Effects of delayed cord clamping on the third stage of labour, maternal haematological parameters and acid–base status in fetuses at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 207: 153-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.031.
37. Grace L, Duggal N, Garabedian M. Maternal safety evaluation following implementation of universal delayed cord clamping [4R]. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127(Supp 1): 148S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000483592.63067.23.
38. Ruangkit C, Leon M, Hassen K, Baker K, Poeltler D, Katheria A. Maternal bleeding complications following early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18: 131. https://doi.org /10.1186/s12884-018-1781-6.
39. Thomas MR, Yoxall CW, Weeks AD, Duley L. Providing newborn resuscitation at the mother’s bedside: Assessing the safety, usability and acceptability of a mobile trolley. BMC Pediatr. 2014; 14: 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-135.
40. Hutchon D. Evolution of neonatal resuscitation with intact placental circulation. Infant. 2014; 10(2): 58-61.
41. Boere I, Smit M, Roest AA, Lopriore E, van Lith JM, te Pas AB. Current practice of cord clamping in the Netherlands: A questionnaire study. Neonatology. 2015; 107(1): 50-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365836.
42. Downey C, Bewley S. Historical perspectives on umbilical cord clamping and neonatal transition. Candice. J R Soc Med. 2012; 105: 325-9. https://doi.org/10.1258 /jrsm.2012.11031.
43. Lundberg C, Øian P, Klingenberg C. Umbilical cord clamping at birth-practice in Norwegian maternity wards. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013; 133(22): 2369-73. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.12.0707.
44. Stoll K, Hutton E. A survey of umbilical cord clamping practices and attitudes of Canadian maternity care providers. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice. 2012; 11(3): 18-29.
45. Ononeze AB, Hutchon DJ. Attitude of obstetricians towards delayed cord clamping: A questionnaire-based study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 29(3): 223-4.
46. Ibrahim NO, Sukkarieh HH, Bustami RT, Alshammari EA, Alasmari LY, Al-Kadri HM. Current umbilical cord clamping practices and attitudes of obstetricians and midwives toward delayed cord clamping in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2017; 37(3): 216-24. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.216.
47. Downey C, Bewley S. Childbirth practitioners’ attitudes to third stage management. British Journal of Midwifery. 2013; 18(9): 576-82. https://doi.org/ 10.12968/bjom.2010.18.9.78066.