Mekanik Kardiopulmoner Resüsitasyon Cihazı Yayınlarının Santometrik Analizi

Abstract

Amaç: Günümüzde otomatik göğüs kompresyon cihazlarının kullanımı giderek artmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı göğüs kompresyon cihazları hakkında popüler yayınları belirleyip araştırmacılara zaman kazandırmak ve göğüs kompresyon cihazlarının önemli noktalarını scientometrik analiz yöntemi ile özetlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tüm veriler 1-8 Temmuz 2023 tarihleri arasında Web of Science Core Collection aramasıyla toplanmıştır. "Otomatik göğüs kompresyon cihazı" veya "Mekanik göğüs kompresyon cihazı" anahtar kelimeleri girilerek konuyla ilgili makaleler çıkarılmıştır. Veritabanındaki tüm makaleler manuel olarak taranmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Veritabanındaki konuyla ilgili makalelerin dağılımı bilimsel dergilere göre incelenmiştir. Global araştırma üretkenliği, uluslararası işbirlikleri ve araştırma konuları, scientometric yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: WoS'da toplam 589 makale belirlenmiştir. Bunların 439'u (%74,407) orijinal makaleler, buna 63 (%10,678) derleme makaleleri ve 30'u (%5,085) editoryal materyallerdir. Araştırma makalelerinin ülkelere göre dağılımını incelediğimizde, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) 171 makale ile listenin başında yer almakta, onu Almanya (n=77) takip etmektedir. İngiltere, makale sayısı açısından 53 ile üçüncü sırada yer almasına rağmen, atıf sayısı açısından birinci sırada yer almıştır (n=3465). En çok yayın yapan ilk 20 derginin değerlendirilmesi sonucunda, Resuscitation Dergisi yayın sayısı (n=133), atıf sayısı (n=5906) ve yayına başına düşen ortalama atıf sayısı (n=44,41) açısından önde gelmektedir. Sonuç: Bibliyometrik çalışmamız mekanik kardiyopulmoner resusitasyon üzerine 589 makaleyi analiz etti. Bu, araştırmacıların trend konuları ve ilgi alanlarını daha kısa sürede belirlemelerine yardımcı olabilir. Acil durumlarda hayat kurtarmak için etkinliğini ve en iyi araçları tam olarak anlamak için daha fazla araştırmaya ihtiyaç vardır.

Keywords

• otomatik göğüs kompresyon cihazı
• kardiyak arrest
• santometrik

A Scientometric Analysis of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitiation Device Publications

Abstract

Aim: Today, the use of automatic chest compression devices is increasing. The aim of this study is to identify popular publications about chest compression devices, save time for researchers, and summarize the important points of chest compression devices using the scientometric analysis method. Material and Methods: All data were collected using the Web of Science Core Collection between July 1-8, 2023. Articles related to the topic were selected using the keywords "automated chest compression device" or "mechanical chest compression device". All articles in the database were manually scanned and analyzed. The distribution of relevant articles in the database was analysed according to scientific journals. Global research productivity, international collaborations, and research themes were analyzed using the scientometric method. Results: A total of 589 articles were identified in the WoS. Out of these, 439 (74.407%) were original articles, followed by 63 (10.678%) review articles and 30 (5.085%) editorial materials. When examining the distribution of research articles by country, the United States (US) topped the list with 171 articles, followed by Germany (n=77). Although the UK ranked third in terms of the number of publications with 53 articles, it ranked first in terms of the number of citations. (n=3465). An assessment of the top 20 publishing journals revealed that the Resuscitation Journal led in terms of publication count (n=133), citation count (n=5906), and average citations per publication (n=44.41). Conclusion: Our bibliometric study analyzed 589 articles on mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This can help researchers identify trending topics and areas of interest more quickly. More research is needed to fully understand the effectiveness and best tools for saving lives in emergency situations.

Keywords

• automatic chest compression device
• cardiac arrest
• scientometric

References

1. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(10): 1219-76.
2. Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW, Perkins GD, Lott C, Carli P, et al. european resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 100-47.
3. Vatsgar TT, Ingebrigtsen O, Fjose LO, Wikstrøm B, Nilsen JE, Wik L. Cardiac arrest and resuscitation with an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) due to anaphylaxis of a woman receiving caesarean section because of pre-eclampsia. Resuscitation. 2006; 68(1): 155-9.
4. Couper K, Smyth M, Perkins GD. Mechanical devices for chest compression: to use or not to use? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015; 21(3): 188-94.
5. Gates S, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, et al. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2017; 21(11): 1-176.
6. Ong MEH, Mackey KE, Zhang ZC, Tanaka H, Ma MH, Swor R, et al. Mechanical CPR devices compared to manual CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: A systematic review. Vol. 20, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2012; 20: 9.
7. Larsen AI, Hjørnevik ÅS, Ellingsen CL, Nilsen DWT. Cardiac arrest with continuous mechanical chest compression during percutaneous coronary intervention: A report on the use of the LUCAS device. Resuscitation. 2007; 75(3): 454-9.
8. Gyory RA, Buchle SE, Rodgers D, Lubin JS. The efficacy of lucas in prehospital cardiac arrest scenarios: A crossover mannequin study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 18(3): 437-45.

9. Gao C, Chen Y, Peng H, Chen Y, Zhuang Y, Zhou S. Clinical evaluation of the AutoPulse automated chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the northern district of Shanghai, China. Archives of Medical Science. 2016; 12(3): 563-70.
10. Khan SU, Lone AN, Talluri S, Khan MZ, Khan MU, Kaluski E. Efficacy and safety of mechanical versus manual compression in cardiac arrest – A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2018; 130: 182-8.
11. Kim HT, Kim JG, Jang YS, Kang GH, Kim W, Choi HY, et al. Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(45): e17881.
12. Sutton RM, Niles D, Nysaether J, Abella BS, Arbogast KB, Nishisaki A, et al. Quantitative analysis of CPR quality during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(2): 494-9.
13. Sutton RM, Maltese MR, Niles D, French B, Nishisaki A, Arbogast KB, et al. Quantitative analysis of chest compression interruptions during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents. Resuscitation. 2009; 80(11): 1259-63.
14. Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, Fellows B, Svensson L, Sørebø H, et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: A prospective interventional study. Resuscitation. 2006; 71(3): 283-92.
15. Pritchard A. Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation. 1969; 25(4): 348-9.
16. Danış F, Kudu E. The evolution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Global productivity and publication trends. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022; 54: 151-64.
17. Löhönen J, Isohanni M, Nieminen P, Miettunen J. A guide for medical information searches of bibliographic databases - psychiatric research as an example. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2009; 68(4): 394-404.
18. Wang Z, Glänzel W, Chen Y. The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science: an analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators. Scientometrics. 2020; 125(2): 1403-23.
19. Anstadt MP, Bartlett RL, Malone JP, Brown GR, Martin S, Nolan DJ, et al. Direct mechanical ventricular actuation for cardiac arrest in humans; A clinical feasibility trial. Chest. 1991; 100(1): 86-92.
20. Long HL, Drown L, Amin M El. The effect of open access on scholarly and societal metrics of impact in the ASHA journals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2023; 66(6): 1948-57.
21. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): A pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015; 385(9972): 947-55.
22. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2014; 311(1): 53-61.
23. Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6): 741-8.
24. Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2004; 63(3): 327-38.
25. Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjöberg T. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2002; 55(3): 285-99.
26. Cave DM, Gazmuri RJ, Otto CW, Nadkarni VM, Cheng A, Brooks SC, et al. Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122(18 Suppl 3): S720-8.
27. Steen S, Sjöberg T, Olsson P, Young M. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005; 67(1): 25-30.
28. Birkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, Adams J. Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020; 1(1): 363-76.
29. Kudu E, Danış F. The Evolution of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Holistic Investigation of Global Outputs with Bibliometric Analysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(12): 1012-24.
30. Yuan F, Cai J, Liu B, Tang X. Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Top-Cited Articles in Gastric Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020(1): 2672373.
31. Weng LM, Zheng YL, Peng MS, Chang TT, Wu B, Wang XQ. A bibliometric analysis of nonspecific low back pain research. Pain Res Manag. 2020; 2020: 5396734.
32. Yu Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Gu Z, Zhong H, Zha Q, et al. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(13): 816.