Investigation of Usability of Sepiolite as a Pozzolan in Production of High Performance Cementitious Composites

Abstract

The continuous growth of population and urbanization in the world significantly increases the demand for cement. In terms of sustainability, the cement industry needs to develop new and effective pozzolans with the appropriate recycling of alternative raw materials. It is also important to evaluate sepiolite, which has very limited resources in the world compared to other industrial minerals and whose economic deposits are limited to Spain and Türkiye. In this study, the usability of sepiolite as a pozzolan in cement and its effects on physical, mechanical and durability properties were investigated. First of all, the chemical and physical properties of sepiolite in Eskisehir region were investigated. Crude and ground sepiolite calcined at 500 ºC, 700 ºC and 900ºC were substituted for CEM I 42.5 R class standard Portland cement at 5-10-15% and 20% ratios. The pozzolanic activities of produced sepiolite substituted cement were determined according to ASTM C-311. As a result, crude sepiolite retains more water than calcined sepiolite, thus negatively affecting the strength properties of the concrete. Additionally, sepiolite is considered suspicious (harmful-harmless) in terms of alkali silica reactivity except 10%-15%-20% crude sepiolite substitutions. Overall, It has been observed that sepiolite does not have sufficient pozzolanic properties in cementitious composites.

Keywords

• Sepiolite
• Pozzolanic activity
• Calcination
• Strength

Supporting Institution

Düzce Üniversitesi

Project Number

2016.07.05.466

Thanks

This article was supported by Düzce University Scientific Research Project numbered 2016.07.05.466.

References

1. [1] X. Gao, Y. Yang, H. Deng, “Utilization of beetmolasses as a grinding aid in blended cements,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, pp. 3782-3789, 2011.
2. [2] R. Snellings, G. Mertens, Ö. Cizer, J. Elsen, ”Early age hydration and pozzolanic reaction in natural zeolite blended cements: Reaction kinetics and products by in situsynchrotron X-ray powder diffraction,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 40, pp. 1704-1713, 2010.
3. [3] H. Y. Aruntaş, M. Gürü, M. Dayı, İ.Tekin, “Utilization of waste marble dust as an additive in cement production,” Materials and Design, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 4039-4042, 2010.
4. [4] O. S. Al-Amoudi, M. Maslehuddin, M. Ibrahim, M. Shameem, M. H. Al-Mehthel, “Performance of blended cement concrete sprepared with constant workability,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 33, pp. 90-102, 2011.
5. [5] İ. Ustabaş, Ş. Erdoğdu, “Farklı öğütücü kolaylaştırıcı katkılı çimentoların özelliklerinin kıyaslaması,” in Chemical Admixtures on Structures 4th Symposium, Ankara, Türkiye, 2013.
6. [6] C. Hosten, B. Fidan, “An industrial comparative study of cement clinker grinding systems regarding the specific energy consumption and cement properties,” Powder Technology, vol. 221, pp. 183-188, 2012.
7. [7] A. Atmaca, M. Kanoglu, “Reducing energy consumption of a rawmill in cement industry,” Energy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 261-269, 2012.
8. [8] M. A. V. Rodriguez, J. D. L. Gonzalez, M. A. Banares, “Acid activation of a spanish sepiolite, physico chemical charakterizatio, free silica content and surface area of the solids obtained,” Clay Minerals, vol. 29, pp. 361-367, 1994.

9. [9] C. E. Weaver, L. D. Pollard, “The chemistry of clay minerals,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, vol. 10, pp. 127, 1973.
10. [10] T. Kavas, E. Sabah, “Sepiyolitin Lif Takviyeli Çimento Üretiminde Kullanılabilirliğinin Araştırılması,” in 4. Endüstriyel Hammaddeler Sempozyumu, İzmir, Türkiye, 2001.
11. [11] T. Kavas, E. Sabah, M. S. Çelik, “Structural properties of sepiolite-reinforced cement composite,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 34, pp. 2135-2139, 2004.
12. [12] E. Fuente, R. Jarabo, A. Moral, Á. Blanco, L. Izquierdo, C. Negro, ”Effect of sepiolite on retention and drainage of suspensions of fiber–reinforced cement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2117-2123, 2010.
13. [13] E. Fuente, R. Jarabo, A. Moral, C. Negro, L. Izquierdo,”Effect of sepiolite on the behaviour of fibre cement suspensions in the manufacture of fibre-reinforced cement,” in 11th Int. Inorganic-Bonded Fiber Composites Conference, Madris, Spain, 2018.
14. [14] S. Andrejkovičová, E. Ferraz, A. L. Velosa, A.S. Silva, F. Rocha, ”Fine sepiolite addition to air lime-metakaolin mortars,” Clay Minerals, vol. 46, pp. 621-635, 2011.
15. [15] S. Martínez-Ramírez, F. Puertas, B.M.T. Varela, “Carbonation process and properties of a new lime mortar with added sepiolite,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1995.
16. [16] A. Demir, “Sepiyolitli harçların mekanik ve fiziksel özeliklerinin incelenmesi,” in Ejovoc Special Issue 2nd International Multidisciplinary Eurasian Congress, Odessa, Ukraine, 2016.
17. [17] M. Savaş, İ. Demir, S. Güzelküçük, Ç.G. Şengül, H. Yaprak, “Thermal and Compressive Strength Properties of Sepiolite Substituted Autoclaved Aerated Concrete,” Journal of Polytechnic, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43-47, 2014.
18. [18] C. He, E. Makovicky, B. Osbæck, “Thermal treatment and pozzolanic activity of sepiolite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 10, pp. 337-349, 1996.
19. [19] S. Pu, P. Duan, C. Yan, D. Ren, “Influence of sepiolite addition on mechanical strength and microstructure of flyash-metakaolin geopolymer paste,” Advanced Powder Technology, vol. 27, pp. 2470-2477, 2016.
20. [20] J. P. Melo, A. S. Aguilar, F. H. Olivares, “Rheological properties of aerated cement pastes with fly ash, metakaolin and sepiolite additions,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 65, pp. 566-573, 2014.
21. [21] N. Alan, S. İşçi, “Surface modification of sepiolite particles with polyurethane,” Progress in Organic Coatings, vol. 77, pp. 444-448, 2014.
22. [22] TS EN 196-1, “Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength,” Ankara, 2002
23. [23] TS EN 196-3, “Methods of testing cement-part 3: determination of setting time and soundness,” Ankara, Türkiye, 2002.
24. [24] TS EN 459-2, “Building lime - Part 2: Test methods,” Ankara, Türkiye, 2003.
25. [25] ASTM C-1260-01, “Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-BarMethod),” USA, 2001
26. [26] ASTM C-311, “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete,” USA, 2004.
27. [27] A. Bideci, A. H. Gültekin, H. Yıldırım, S. Oymael, Ö. Sallı Bideci, “Internal structure examination of light weight concrete produced with polymer-coated pumice aggregate,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 54, pp. 439-447, 2013. [28] F. A. Shaker, A. S. El-Dieb, M. M. Reda, “Durability of styrene-butadiene latex modified concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 27, pp. 711-720, 1997.
28. [29] X. Chenxi, W. Caihui, L. Wenhao, S. Kaili, Z. Guangxing, S. Guowen, K. Lijuan, “Internal Curing Mechanism of Sepiolite in Cement Paste,” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., pp. 857-864, 2023.
29. [30] H. Doostkami,, S. Formagini, P. Serna, M. R. Flores,“ Effects of healing start time and duration on conventional and high-performance concretes incorporating SAP, crystalline admixture, and sepiolite: A comparative study,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 20, 2024.
30. [31] C. Wu, Z. Hong, B. Zhan, S. Cui, S. Kou,” Pozzolanic activity of calcinated low-grade natural sepiolite and its influence on the hydration of cement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 309, 2021.
31. [32] W. Chunran, K. Shicong,” Effects of high-calcium sepiolite on the rheological behaviour and mechanical strength of cement pastes and mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 196, pp. 105-114, 2019.