Bibliometric Profile of Global Scientific Research on Monitoring and Assessment of Aquatic Toxicology (2015-2019)

Yıl 2023, , 902 - 911, 25.08.2023

Ayşen Nil Berber , V. Zülal Sönmez , Ceyhun Akarsu , Nuket Sivri

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1249718

Öz

In recent decades, extensive research has been conducted to explore toxicity in the aquatic environment. In spite of the extensive research conducted on toxicity in the aquatic environment, there is a need for a comprehensive analysis that integrates various aspects of the research landscape. This study focused on: i) providing characteristics of research areas of publications, ii) assessing productive countries and institutions, iii) identifying research topics based on certain keywords and defining research hotspots, and iv) assisting in the perspective of current hot topics, future trends, and challenges. A systematic review and analysis of studies on natural water and wastewater toxicology from the Scopus database were conducted, covering the period from 2015 to 2019. This study presents a temporal distribution of publications considering several factors, such as materials, types of toxicity, test organisms, journals, and country. By conducting a comprehensive search on Scopus, our study identified a total of 7,043 articles on acute (62%) and chronic toxicity (38%). Freshwater environments accounted for the majority of acute and chronic toxicity studies, while studies on wastewater environments were relatively scarce. Daphnia magna emerged as the most used organism, representing 41% of acute toxicity studies and 27% of chronic toxicity studies. The results show that China is the most productive country with 330 articles. The study has made it possible to visualise an effective contribution to science by filling the existing gaps. It has provided some perspectives and insights for the development of further research on this topic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

: Ecotoxicity, Acute, Chronic, Aquatic systems, Bibliometric analysis

Destekleyen Kurum

Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Scientific Research Projects

Proje Numarası

FBA-2018-32551

Teşekkür

This paper is an excerpt from the first author's Master's thesis entitled "Bibliometric Profile of Global Scientific Research on Monitoring and Assessment of Water and Wastewater Toxicology (2015-2020)" (IUC Institute of Graduate Studies - Department of Environmental Engineering).

Kaynakça

• M. Hotamışlı, I. Erem, " Bibliometric Analysis of the Articles Published in Journal of Accounting and Finance," The Journal of Accounting and Finance, no. 63, pp. 1-20, 2014.
• R. Kumaresan, K. Vinitha, K. Kannan, “Bibliometric analysis of aquatic microbial ecology from 2000–2014”, International Journal of Research in Library Science, vol. 3, no. 2, 1-14, 2017.
• J. A. Wallin, “Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 97, no 5, pp. 261-75, 2005.
• T. Van Raan, “Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping, Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance”, vol. 87, 17-28, 2014.
• R. Kumaresan, K. Vinitha, K. Kannan, “Aquatic Toxicology (2005–2014): a bibliometric study.” Research trends in library and information science: a festschrift volume in honour of Prof. V. Geetha, T. Muruganantham, Ed.. Tiruchirappalli: Alumni Association of Library and Information and PG & Research Department of Library and Information Science, Bishop Heber College (Autonomous), 95-106, 2016.
• K., Mendis, J. Baileyi, R. G., Mclean, “Tracking Australian health and medical research expenditure with a PubMed bibliometric method”, Australian and New Zeland Journal of Public Health, vol. 39, no 3, pp. 203-298, 2015.
• U. Al, R. Coştur, “Bibliometric Profile of Turkish Journal of Psychology,” Turkish Librarianship, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 142-163, 2007.
• A. D. Canning, R. G. Death, “Ecosystem Health Indicators,” Freshwater Environments Encyclopedia of Ecology (Second Edition), vol. 1, pp. 46-60, 2019.
• H. Arnold, H. J. Pluta, T. Braunbeck, T. “Cytological alterations in the liver of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after prolonged exposure to low concentrations of waterborne endosulfan,” Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, vol. 25, pp. 39-52, 1996.
• J. E. Klauning, “Pesticide Toxicology, Evaluating Safety and Risk,” Purdue Pesticide Programs. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, P-40, Indiana University School of Medicine, 2000.
• V. S. Leblond, M. Bisson, A. Hontela, “Inhibition of cortisol secretion in dispersed head kidney cells of rainbow trout (O. mykiss) by endosulfan, an organochlorine pesticide” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 121, no 1, pp. 48-56, 2001.
• D. Arome, E. Chinedu, “The importance of toxicity testing” Journal of Pharmaceutical and BioSciences, vol. 4, pp. 146-148, 2013.
• G. Hanrahan, Çevre Kimyasında Temel Kavramlar (Ed. İsmail Toröz), Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2013, Ankara. (in Turkish).
• M. A. Aydın, S. Yıldız, S. Özcan, G. Kara, “Atıksuların toksisitesinin belirlenmesinde farklı biyotest yöntemlerinin uygulanması,” 7. Ulusal Çevre Mühendisliği Kongresi, İzmir, Turkey, 2000, pp. 683-700. (in Turkish).
• F. Yılmaz, “Physico-Chemical Features of Mumcular Dam Lake (Mugla-Bodrum)” Ecology, vol. 14 no 50, pp. 10-17, 2004.
• H. Kalyoncu, M. Barlas M, B. Yorulmaz, “The Relationship between the Physicochemical Structure and the Epilithic Algae Diversity of Aksu River (Isparta-Antalya)”, Ecology, vol. 17, no 66, 15-22, 2008.
• M. Akbulut, H. Kaya, E. S. Celik, D. A. Odabasi, S. S. Odabasi, K. Selvi, “Assessment of Surface Water Quality in the Atikhisar Reservoir and Saricay Creek,” Ecology, vol. 19, no 74, pp. 139-149, 2010.
• M. Ayvaz, E. Tenekecioğlu, E. Koru, “Determination of trophic status of Afşar (Manisa-Turkey) dam lake,” Ecology, vol. 20, no 81, pp. 37-47, 2011.
• T. Hanazato, “Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: An ecological perspective,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 112, no 1, pp. 1-10, 2001.
• A. N. Berber, “Bibliometric profile of global scientific research on monitoring and assessment of aquatic and wastewater toxicology (2015-2019)”, MSc Thesis, Institute of Graduate Education, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Turkey, 2021.
• N. J. Van Eck, L. Waltman, R. Dekker, J. Van den Berg, “A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no 12, pp. 2405-2416, 2010.
• G. M. Khalil, C. A. G. Crawford, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Us-Based Research on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 48 no 1, pp. 50-57, 2015.
• J. M. Parnis, D. Mackay, “Multimedia environmental models: The fugacity approach,” CRC Press, 3rd Ed., 2019, pp 301.
• S. Parvez, C. Venkataraman, “A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals” Environment International, vol 32, no 2, 265-268, 2006.
• A. Białk-Bielińska, L. Grabarczyk, E. Mulkiewicz, A. Puckowski, S. Stolte, P. Stepnowski “Mixture toxicity of six pharmaceuticals towards Aliivibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna, and Lemna minor” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol 29, 26977-26991, 2022.