Research Article

Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES

Volume: 28 Number: 4 August 31, 2024
EN

Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES

Abstract

Soil is a one of the important physical evidence that could be encountered in any objects including car tire, shoes, or clothes. This study presents the comparison of the soils in Ömerli Dam, Istanbul-Türkiye. 35 of soil samples from 7 different regions have been collected around the lake. FTIR and ICP-OES have been utilized for structural analysis and detection of metal contect in soil samples. Moreover, textural analysis, pH, sedimentation, color tests have been systematically investigated. The image of soil samples is also captured under different light of sources by VSC 8000. The outcome shows that discrimination of soil samples could be studied using various techniques including FTIR, textural analysis, metal concentrations and their color. ICP-OES analysis showed that the soil have various elements such as Si, Fe, Mg, Ca, Cu with a different amounts which provide discrimination for soil samples. The natural pH of the samples varied between 6.1 and 8.3 that are from slightly acidic to moderately alkaline character.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

We thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK for the support of this work through Grant 1919B012307270 (2209-A University Students Domestic Research Projects Support Program).

Project Number

1919B012307270

Ethical Statement

Etik beyana ihtiyaç yoktur.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank Melike KIZIL for ICP-OES analysis

References

  1. S. C. A. Uitdehaag, T. H. Donders, I. Kuiper, F. Wagner-Cremer, M. J. Sjerps, “Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework,” Science Justice, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2022.
  2. N. A. N. B. Mohd Rosdi, N. Abd Hamid, S. F. Mohd Ali, H. Sino, L. C. Lee, “A Critical Review of Soil Sampling and Data Analysis Strategies for Source Tracing of Soil in Forensic Investigations,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, pp. 1–39, 2023.
  3. A. Ruffell, “Forensic pedology, forensic geology, forensic geoscience, geoforensics and soil forensics,” Forensic Science International, vol. 202, no. 1–3, pp. 9–12, 2010.
  4. L. A. Dawson, R. W. Mayes, “Criminal and environmental soil forensics: soil as physical evidence in forensic investigations,” Forensic Sciences, vol. 2 no.5 pp. 457–486, 2022.
  5. L. C. Lee, A. A. Ishak, A. A. Nai Eyan, A. F. Zakaria, N. S. Kharudin, N. A. M. Noor, “Forensic profiling of non-volatile organic compounds in soil using ultra-performance liquid chromatography: a pilot study,” Forensic Science Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 761–773, 2022.
  6. D. O. Carter, D. Yellowlees, M. Tibbett, “Moisture can be the dominant environmental parameter governing cadaver decomposition in soil,” Forensic Science International, vol. 200, no. 1–3, pp. 60–66, 2010.
  7. R. C. Murray, J. C. F. Tedwow, “Soil in trace evidence analysis,” 13th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France, 2001, pp. 75–78.
  8. E.-J. Won, H.-Y. Yun, D.-H. Lee, K.-H. Shin, “Application of compound-specific isotope analysis in environmental forensic and strategic management avenue for pesticide residues,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 15, p. 4412, 2021.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Analytical Chemistry (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 1, 2024

Publication Date

August 31, 2024

Submission Date

March 15, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 9, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 28 Number: 4

APA
Kızıl, S., Boler, İ. S., & Atasoy, S. (2024). Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 28(4), 794-803. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097
AMA
1.Kızıl S, Boler İS, Atasoy S. Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES. SAUJS. 2024;28(4):794-803. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097
Chicago
Kızıl, Soner, İkra Sedef Boler, and Sevil Atasoy. 2024. “Forensic Comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 28 (4): 794-803. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097.
EndNote
Kızıl S, Boler İS, Atasoy S (August 1, 2024) Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES. Sakarya University Journal of Science 28 4 794–803.
IEEE
[1]S. Kızıl, İ. S. Boler, and S. Atasoy, “Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES”, SAUJS, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 794–803, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097.
ISNAD
Kızıl, Soner - Boler, İkra Sedef - Atasoy, Sevil. “Forensic Comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 28/4 (August 1, 2024): 794-803. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097.
JAMA
1.Kızıl S, Boler İS, Atasoy S. Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES. SAUJS. 2024;28:794–803.
MLA
Kızıl, Soner, et al. “Forensic Comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 28, no. 4, Aug. 2024, pp. 794-03, doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097.
Vancouver
1.Soner Kızıl, İkra Sedef Boler, Sevil Atasoy. Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES. SAUJS. 2024 Aug. 1;28(4):794-803. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097

Cited By


INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

33418 33537  30939     30940 30943 30941  30942  33255    33253  33254

30944  30945  30946   34239




30930Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Ticari Olmayan 4.0 Uluslararası Lisans   kapsamında lisanslanmıştır .