Production of Polymer Matrix Fiber-Reinforced Composites and Investigation of Their Ballistic Properties

Abstract

The advancements in weaponry and ammunition within the defense industry have significantly increased the demand for improved personal protection and military equipment. This trend has particularly emphasized wearable lightweight body armor for personnel and heavy armor for military vehicles. Traditionally, steel materials have been predominantly used for ballistic protection. However, as mobility is a critical requirement for military personnel, recent research efforts have focused on developing composite or ceramic-based armor systems, aiming to reduce weight while maintaining or improving ballistic performance. In this study, laminated composite materials reinforced with Kevlar 29, carbon fiber, and glass fiber were designed using a resin matrix. The mechanical and ballistic properties of these materials were analyzed through simulations performed using SolidWorks for geometric modeling and ANSYS software for finite element analysis under ballistic impact. Following the simulation phase, the composite structures were fabricated using the vacuum infusion method. Ballistic tests were conducted in compliance with the NIJ-0101.06 standards for protection levels IIA and III, using 9x19 mm and 7.62 mm ammunition, respectively. Results indicated that Level IIA protection was achieved with Sample No. 2, which comprised 5 layers of glass fiber, 5 layers of Kevlar 29, and 5 layers of carbon fiber, with a total weight of 650 grams. Experimental findings revealed a notable reduction in penetration levels with an increasing number of layers, highlighting the effectiveness of the material design and configuration. This study demonstrates the potential of polymer matrix-based composite armor systems as a lightweight and efficient alternative for ballistic protection.

Keywords

• Ballistic performance
• Polymer matrix composites
• Lightweight armor
• Vacuum infusion
• Finite element analysis

References

1. S. Ünlü, “Polimer matrisli elyaf takviyeli kompozit malzeme imalatı ve balistik özelliklerin incelenmesi,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Metallurgical and Materials Eng., Sakarya Univ. of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey, 2023.
2. Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor, NIJ Standard-0101.06., Nat. Inst. Justice, U.S. Dept. Justice, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
3. S. E. Özgültekin, “Bali̇sti̇k zırhlarda kullanılan kompozi̇t malzeme kombi̇nasyonlarinin incelenmesi̇,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Mechanical Eng., Sakarya Univ., Sakarya, Turkey, 2012.
4. Y. Yanfei, “Study on ballistic performance of hybrid soft body armour,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Manchester, Manchester, U.K., 2015.
5. T. Kurtuluş, “Çok katmanlı kompozit zırh malzemesi üretimi ve balistik özelliklerinin incelenmesi,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Manufacturing Eng., Karabük Univ., Karabük, Turkey, 2019.
6. F. Yeşilyurt and M. E. Yeşilyurt, “Türkiye’de savunma sanayi,” Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-42, 2019, doi: 10.34232/pjess.565105
7. E. Ateş, “Türk savunma sanayinin ihracat rekabet gücünün belirlenmesi,” SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 433-460, 2023, doi: 10.54078/savsad.1061928
8. R. Hima, “Türkiye’nin savunma ve savunma harcamalarının komşusu olan ülkelerle karşılaştırmalı analizi,” M.S. thesis, Hacettepe Univ., Ankara, Turkey, 1997.

9. Y. Küçük and B. K. Çelik, “Kompozit zırh tasarımı ve balistik direncinin incelenmesi,” Bartın Univ. Int. J. Nat. Appl. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12-20, 2023, doi: 10.55930/jonas.1275151
10. P. J. Hazell, Armour: Materials, theory, and design, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2022.
11. Z. Chen et al., “Analysis of bulletproof performance of structurally optimized ceramic composite armor through numerical simulation and live fire test,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 31685, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80752-0
12. A. Jinnapat, P. Doungkom, K. Somton, and K. Dateraksa, “Ballistic performance of composite armor impacted by 7.62 mm armor projectile,” Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 120-127, 2023, doi: 10.55713/jmmm.v33i2.1698
13. F. Bozdoğan, S. Üngün, E. Temel, and G. Mengüç, “Balistik koruma amaçlı kullanılan tekstil materyalleri, özellikleri ve balistik performans testleri,” Tekstil ve Mühendis, vol. 22, no. 98, pp. 84-103, 2015, doi: 10.7216/130075992015229808
14. H. H., Billon and D. J. Robinson, “Models for the ballistic impact of fabric armour,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 411-422, 2001, doi: 10.1016/s0734-743x(00)00049-x
15. History of Body Armor, http://www.leonuniform.com/BodyArmor_History.htm , [Accessed: Mar. 6, 2014].
16. A. Çay, G. Süpüren, Z. E. Kanat, T. Gülümser, and I. Tarakçıoğlu, “Balistik lifler (Bölüm 1)”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, vol. 4, pp. 232-236, 2007.
17. M. Turan, “Tabakalı kompozit malzemelerde yüksek hızlı darbe hasarı,” Mühendis ve Makina, vol. 48, no. 575, pp. 3-8, 2007.
18. S. Muszynski, “Body Armor,” Tech. Rep., Eastern Michigan Univ., School of Staff and Command, Ypsilanti, MI, USA, 2004.
19. A. Verdi and M. O. Bulut, “NIJ Standardı Seviye-IV Korumalı Zırh Bileşenlerinin İncelenmesi ve Balistik Koruma Standartları,” Journal of Technical Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 69-81, 2022, doi: 10.35354/tbed.999089
20. Ballistic Resistance of Personal Body Armor, NIJ Standard-0101.06, Nat. Inst. Justice, U.S. Dept. Justice, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
21. G. Gopinath, J. Q. Zheng, and R. C. Batra, “Effect of matrix on ballistic performance of soft body armor,” Composite Structures, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 2690-2696, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.038
22. S. Ulus, M. Özen, G. Demircan, and M. Kısa, “Bazalt lif takviyeli kompozitlerin balistik incelenmesi,” in Proc. Int. Harran Multidisciplinary Studies Congr., Harran Univ., Turkey, Mar. 2019, pp. 175–180.