-

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to be researched the percentage of accuracy in the illness of fibromyalgia syndrome which is only diagnosed with the data of sympathetic skin responses. In the scope of this purpose, the data of sympathetic skin responses which are taken from diagnosed fibromyalgia patients and healthy individuals are analysed and it reveals the percentage of accuracy by using matlab software. In this paper, besides our study, it is also informed about a brief study of literature review on sympathetic skin responses and fibromyalgia syndrome.

Keywords

• fibromiyalgi asyndrome, sympathetic skin response, fibromiyalgia diagnosis, artificial neural networks.

Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada fibromiyalji sendromu hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis edilebilme doğruluk
yüzdesinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında tanısı konmuş fibromiyalji sendromlu hastalardan ve
sağlıklı bireylerden alınan sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile matlab yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve doğruluk
yüzdeleri çıkarılmıştır. Makalemizde çalışmamızın yanında sempatik deri yanıtı hakkında kısa bir literatür tarama
çalışmasına ve fibromiyalji sendromu hakkında bilgi verilmiştir.

Keywords

• fibromiyalji sendromu, sempatik deri direnci, fibromiyalji teşhisi, yapay sinir ağları

References

1. (REFERENCES) Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu Ph, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response – a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropaties. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536-542.
2. Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Lek Listy 2004; 105 (3): 108
3. Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential: a quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J Neurol Sci 1985; 67: 239-251.
4. Verghese A. Some observations on psychogalvanic reflex. Brij J Psychiat 1968; 114: 639-6
5. Christie MJ. Elekctrodermal activity in the 1980s: a review. J Roy Soc Med 1981; 74; 616-622.
6. Lader MH, Montagu JD. The psychogalvanic reflex: a pharmacologic study of peripheral machanism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 126-133.
7. Eisenstein EM, Eisenstein D, Bonheim P, Welch EA. Habituation of galvanik skin response in adult males as function of age. Physiol Bchav 1990; 48: 169-173.
8. Ertekin C. Santral ve periferik EMG Otonom sinir sistemi. 2006:884-909

9. Cariga P, Catley M, Mathias CJ, Savic G Frankel HL, Ellaway PH.: Organisation of the Sympathetic Skin Response in Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72:356-360, 200 Selçuk B, Atlı D, Kurtaran A, İnanır M, Akyüz M.: Serebrovasküler Olay Sonrası Hemipleji Gelişen Hastalarda Sempatik Deri Yanıtları. Türk Fiz. Tıp ve Rehab. Derg., 49(5):18-23, 2003
10. Arunodaya GR, Taly AB.: Sympathetic Skin Response: A Decade Later, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 129: 81-89, 1995
11. Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basis mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res. 2003; 13:256-270.
12. Shaver BA, Brusilow SW, Cooke RE. Origin of the galvanic skin response. Proc Soc Ex Biol NY 1962; 110: 559–564.
13. Takagi K, Nakayama T. Peripheral effector mechanism of galvanic skin reflex. Jpn J Physiol 1959; 9: 1-7.
14. Roberto Vetrugno, Rocco Liguori, Pietro Cortelli, Pasquale Montagna. Sympathetic skin response. Basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13 : 256–270.
15. Yokota T, Takahashi T,Kondo M, Fujimori B. Studies on the diphasic wave form of thegalvanic skin reflex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1959; 11: 687–696.
16. Guida A. A new method of simultaneous recording of two effects of the psychogalvanic reflex (Tarchanoff effect and Fere effect) Riv Patol Clin. 1957 Jun;12(6):303-1
17. Çakır T, Evcik D, Dündar Ü, Yiğit İ, Kavuncu V.: Evaluation of Sympathetic Skin Response and F Wave in Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patient, Turk J Rheumatol 2011;26(1):38-43 doi: 5606/tjr.2011.006.
18. Wolfe, F, Smythe, H.A, Yunus, M.B, The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia, Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee, Arthritis Rheum., 33(2): 160-72, Feb. 2009.
19. Moldofsky H, Scarisbrick P, England R, Smythe H.Musculosketal symptoms and non-REM sleep disturbance in patients with “fibrositis syndrome” and healthy subjects. Psychosom Med 1975;37(4):341-351.
20. McBeth J, Macfarlene GJ, Benjamin S, et al. The assocation between tender points, psychological distress, and adverse childhood experiences. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1397-1404.
21. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME; eds. Rheumatology 4th ed. New York Mosby Pr; 2007:701-711.
22. Dönmez A, Erdoğan N. Fibromiyalji Sendromu. Klinik Gelişim 60-64. Özkan Ö, Yildiz M, Köklükaya E, “Fibromiyalji sendromunun teşhisinde kullanılan laboratuar testlerinin sempatik deri cevabı parametreleriyle desteklenerek teşhis doğruluğunun arttırılması”, SAÜ. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15. Cilt, 1. Sayı, s.17, 20