Geniş Bant Konum Belirleme Sistemi Performans Analizi ve İyileştirilmesi

Yıl 2017, , 26 - 33, 31.01.2017

Kerem Küçük

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.283860

Öz

 Geniş bant spektrumu ve yüksek
çözünürlük özellikleri ile çok geniş bant (Ultra-Wide Band, UWB) teknolojisi,
birçok kapalı alan konum belirleme probleminde tercih edilmektedir. Bu
çalışmada; UWB kablosuz sinyallerini kullanan konum belirleme sisteminin konum
belirleme performansının belirlenmesi ve genellikle açık alan konum
belirlemesinde kullanılan yatay hassaslık ölçeğinin (Horizontal Dilution
Precision, HDOP) kapalı alanda bu sistem için kullanılmasıyla, konum tahmin
hatasının iyileştirilmesi için yeni bir yöntem sunulmaktadır. Bu yöntem
kullanışsız olan konum tahmin noktalarının elenmesi temel almaktadır ve UWB
konum belirleme sistemi ile elde edilen deneysel konum belirleme sonuçlarının
iyileştirilmesini sağlamaktadır. Bu yöntemin performans analizi için UWB
sisteminin sağladığı konum verilerine literatürde kullanılan en küçük kareler
(Least Squares, LS) ve doğrusal olmayan regresyon (Non-Linear Regression, NLR)
ve önerilen HDOP tekniklerinin uygulanması ile elde edilen sonuçlar
karşılaştırılmalı olarak sunulmaktadır. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki; önerilen
HDOP tekniği, LS algoritmasının ortalama konum hatasına göre yaklaşık olarak %9
oranında, NLR algoritmasına göre ise %5 oranında daha iyi sonuç vermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çok geniş bant, Bina içi konum belirleme, Yatay hassaslık ölçeği

Performance analysis and improvement of the ultra-wide band localization system

Öz

With the very wide spectrum and high resolution characteristics, ultra-wideband (UWB) communication technique is
chosen various indoor localization. This paper presents the localization performance of a positioning system, which
uses UWB wireless signals, and a novel method to decrease the localization error using horizontal dilution of precision
(HDOP), which uses for outdoor positioning in the literature, for this system. This method focuses to eliminate the
unadaptable localization points and provides elimination of UWB experimental localization results. The comparison
between the proposed method localizations and the results by elimination of UWB system raw localization data with
the least-squares (LS) and the non-linear regression (NLR) techniques are provided for the performance analysis. As
the results, the proposed HDOP technique approximately provides 9% the better performance than the LS algorithm.
In addition, the technique also provides 5% the better performance than the NLR algorithm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ultra-wide band, Indoor localization, Horizontal dilution of precision

Kaynakça

• [1] Y. Chen, S. Zhang, S Xu, G. Y. Li, “Fundamental Trade-offs on Green Wireless Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 30-37, 2011.
• [2] P. H. Tseng and K. T. Feng, “Hybrid Network/Satellite-Based Location Estimation and Tracking Systems for Wireless Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 5174-5189, 2009.
• [3] S. C. Yeh, W. H. Hsu, M. Y. Su, C. H. Chen, K. H. Liu, “A Study on Outdoor Positioning Technology using GPS and WiFi Networks,” Int. Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Japan, 26-29 March 2009, pp. 597-601.
• [4] L. Huan and R. Bo, “Wireless location for indoor based on UWB,” 34th Chinese Control Conference, Hangzhou, 2015, pp. 6430-6433.
• [5] S. Gezici and H. Poor H, “Position Estimation via Ultra-Wide-Band Signals", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 386-403, 2009.
• [6] H. Liu, H. Darabi, P. Banerjee, J. Liu, “Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems,” IEEE Tran. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1067-1080, 2007.
• [7] D. Niculescu and B. Nath, “Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS) using AOA,” The IEEE 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, USA, April 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1734-1743.
• [8] A. Catovic and Z. Sahinoglu, “The Cramer-Rao bounds of hybrid TOA/RSS and TDOA/RSS location estimation schemes,” IEEE Communacitions Letter, vol. 8, pp. 626-628, 2004.
• [9] T. Wang, X. Chen, N. Ge, Y. Pei, “Error analysis and experimental study on indoor UWB TDoA localization with reference tag,” 2013 19th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, Denpasar, 2013, pp. 505-508.
• [10] S. Monica and G. Ferrari, “UWB-based localization in large indoor scenarios: optimized placement of anchor nodes,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 987-999, 2015.
• [11] X. Li and S. Yang, “The indoor real-time 3D localization algorithm using UWB,” International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, Beijing, 2015, pp. 337-342.
• [12] H. Cai, G. Wu, Y. Chen, L. Jiang, “Indoor collaborative localization method based on ultra-wideband ranging,” 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Lisbon, 2015, pp. 1-2.
• [13] G. Zhao and H. Niu, “Research and application of indoor positioning based on UWB,” Third International Conference on Cyberspace Technology, Beijing, 2015, pp. 1-5.
• [14] D. Briese, H. Kunze, G. O. Rose, “High Precision UWB-Based 3D Localization for Medical Environment,” IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband, Montreal, QC, 2015, pp. 1-5.
• [15] G. Feng, C. Shen, C. Long, F. Dong, “GDOP index in UWB indoor location system experiment”, IEEE Sensors, Busan, 2015, pp. 1-4.
• [16] K. Kucuk, “Horizontal dilution of precision based ultra wide band positioning technique for indoor environments,” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 1307-1322, 2014.
• [17] M. Baum, “RTL in Longueuil selects bus yard management solution provided by Solotech”, ISR Transit and Ubisense, 2011.
• [18] W. Chantaweesomboon et al., “On performance study of UWB real time locating system,” 2016 7th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems (IC-ICTES), Bangkok, 2016, pp. 19-24.
• [19] J. Youn and Y. Cho, “Performance Study of an Ultra-Wideband Indoor Localization and Asset Tracking System,” in title of Ultra Wideband, Rijeka, Croatia, InTech Europe, 2010.
• [20] R. Yarlagadda, I. Ali, N. Al-Dhahir, J. Hershey, “GPS GDOP Metric,” Radar, Sonar and Navigation IEE Proceedings, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 259-264, 2000.
• [21] J. Yan, C. C. J. M. Tiberius, P. J. G. Teunissen, G. Bellusci and G. J. M. Janssen, “A Framework for Low Complexity Least-Squares Localization With High Accuracy,” in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4836-4847, Sept. 2010.
• [22] S. Marano, W. M. Gifford, H. Wymeersch and M. Z. Win, “NLOS identification and mitigation for localization based on UWB experimental data,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1026-1035, September 2010.