Experimental Investigation on Effect to the Specific Strength of FDM Fabrication Parameters Using Taguchi Method

Abstract

The Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) fabrication is commonly used printing technique, the reasons behind this are low consumable cost, simplicity of workflow and more reliable. The quality of the printed parts depends on various process variables such as part orientation, layer thickness, hotend and bed temperature, fabricating speed, infill pattern and infill density, number of top-bottom solid layers, number of shells etc. Literature suggests that infill density, number of shells and number of top-bottom solid layers are variables that changing the tensile strength under tension of 3D fabricated parts and also have effect on weight of the parts. This study focuses on effect of infill density (ID), number of shells (NS) and top-bottom solid layers (TBSL) on specific strength (strength/weight ratio). Taguchi L18 Orthogonal Array (OA) design is used to perform the experiments. 18 runs with 3 repeated specimens were printed according to the ASTM D638 Type I standard using different printing variables. According to the results, parameters increase of ID, NS and TBSL were seen to effect significant improvement in the specific strength increase. However, between 40-60% ID has negative effect to specific strength while NS and TBSL increase.

Keywords

• Fused Deposition Modelling
• Specific Strength
• 3D printing
• Taguchi Method

References

1. A. J. Sheoran and H. Kumar, “Fused Deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 21, pp. 1659–1672, 2020.
2. H. Vardhan, R. Kumar and J. S. Chohan, “Investigation of tensile properties of sprayed aluminium based PLA composites fabricated by FDM technology,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Article in Press, 2020.
3. A. Pandzic, D. Hodzic, and A. Milovanovic, “Effect of infill type and density on tensile properties of pla material for fdm process,” 30th Daaam International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, pp. 545–554, 2019.
4. R. Srinivasan, R. Srinivasan, Asrith Raj, S. A. Kannan and V. Deepak, “Influence of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of PETG parts,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, pp. 1877–1883, 2020.
5. P. Wang, B. Zou, S. Ding, L. Li, and C. Huang, “Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Article in Press, 2020.
6. A. E. Tontowi, L. Ramdani, R. V. Erdizon and D. K. Baroroh, “Optimization of 3D-printer process parameters for improving quality of polylactic acid printed part,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 589–600, 2017.
7. A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, and A. Guzman, “experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: a design-for-manufacturing approach,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 10, pp. 791–803, 2017.
8. M. Montero, S. Roundy, D. Odell, S.-H. Ahn and P. K. Wright, “Material characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) abs by designed experiments,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2001.

9. C. Dudescu, and L. Racz, “Effects of raster orientation, infill rate and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed materials,” Acta Uiversitatis Cibiniensis – Technical Series, vol. 69, 2017.
10. A. W. Gebisa, R. Kumar and H. G. Lemu, “Investigating Effects of Fused-Deposition Modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment,” Materials, 11, 500 (article number: 19), 2018.
11. P. Wang, B. Zou, H. Xiao, S. Ding and C. Huang, “Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK,” Journal of Materials Processing Tech., vol. 271, pp. 62–74, 2019.
12. A. Alafaghani, and A. Qattawi, “Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 36, pp. 164–174, 2018.
13. K. G. J. Christiyan, U. Chandrasekhar and K. Venkateswarlu, “A study on the influence of process parameters on the Mechanical Properties of 3D printed ABS composite,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 114, 2015.
14. K. G. Mostafa, C. Montemagno and A. J. Qureshi, “Strength to cost ratio analysis of FDM Nylon 12 3D printed parts,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 26, pp. 753–762, 2018.
15. V. Wankhede, D. Jagetiya, A. Joshi and R. Chaudhari, “Experimental investigation of FDM process parameters using Taguchi analysis,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, pp. 2117–2120, 2020.
16. Y. Magdum, D. Pandey, A. Bankar, S. Harshe, V. Parab and M: S. Kadam, “Process parameter optimization for FDM 3D printer,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 1472–1477, 2019.