Research Article

Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots

Volume: 25 Number: 3 June 30, 2021
EN

Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots

Abstract

As one of today's popular research field, mobile robots, are widely used in entertainment, search and rescue, health, military, agriculture and many other fields with the advantages of technological developments. Object detection is one of the methods used for mobile robots to gather and report information about its environment during those tasks. With the ability to detect and classify objects, a robot can determine the type and number of objects around it and use this knowledge in its movement and path planning or reporting the objects with the desired features. Considering the dimensions of mobile robots and weight constraints of flying robots, the use of these algorithms is more limited. While the size and weight of mobile devices should be kept relatively small, successful object classification algorithms require processors with high computational power. In this study, to be able to use object detection information for mapping and path planning object detection and classification methods were examined, and for the usage in low weight and low energy consuming platforms through developer boards, detection algorithms were compared to each other.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Hassani, Imen, Imen Maalej, and Chokri Rekik. "Robot path planning with avoiding obstacles in known environment using free segments and turning points algorithm." Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (2018).
  2. [2] O. Khatib, "Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots", International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(1):90-98, 1986.
  3. [3] J.F.Canny and J.H. Reif, "New Lower Bound Techniques for Robot Motion Planning Problems", Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 49-60, Los Angeles, CA, 1987.
  4. [4] R. A. Jarvis, ”Distance Transform Based Collision-Free Path Planning for Robot”, Advanced Mobile Robots, World Scientific Publishing, pp.3-31, 1994.
  5. [5] Ganganath, Nuwan, and Henry Leung. "Mobile robot localization using odometry and kinect sensor." 2012 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Signal Processing Applications. IEEE, 2012.
  6. [6] Patle, B. K., et al. "A review: On path planning strategies for navigation of mobile robot." Defence Technology (2019).
  7. [7] J. Leonard and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Simultaneous map building and localization for an autonomous mobile robot,” Proceedings IROS ’91:IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems ’91, no. 91, pp. 1442– 1447, 1991.
  8. [8] C. Cadena, L. Carlone, H. Carrillo, Y. Latif, D. Scaramuzza, J. Neira, I. Reid, and J. Leonard, “Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1309–1332, 2016.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

November 20, 2020

Acceptance Date

April 26, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 25 Number: 3

APA
Alparslan, Ö., & Çetin, Ö. (2021). Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 25(3), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.828841
AMA
1.Alparslan Ö, Çetin Ö. Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots. SAUJS. 2021;25(3):751-765. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.828841
Chicago
Alparslan, Önder, and Ömer Çetin. 2021. “Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 25 (3): 751-65. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.828841.
EndNote
Alparslan Ö, Çetin Ö (June 1, 2021) Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots. Sakarya University Journal of Science 25 3 751–765.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Alparslan and Ö. Çetin, “Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots”, SAUJS, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 751–765, June 2021, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.828841.
ISNAD
Alparslan, Önder - Çetin, Ömer. “Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 25/3 (June 1, 2021): 751-765. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.828841.
JAMA
1.Alparslan Ö, Çetin Ö. Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots. SAUJS. 2021;25:751–765.
MLA
Alparslan, Önder, and Ömer Çetin. “Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 25, no. 3, June 2021, pp. 751-65, doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.828841.
Vancouver
1.Önder Alparslan, Ömer Çetin. Comparison of Object Detection and Classification Methods For Mobile Robots. SAUJS. 2021 Jun. 1;25(3):751-65. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.828841

Cited By


INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

33418 33537  30939     30940 30943 30941  30942  33255    33253  33254

30944  30945  30946   34239




30930Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Ticari Olmayan 4.0 Uluslararası Lisans   kapsamında lisanslanmıştır .