Çevreci Çözücüler ile Polivinilpirolidon Nanolif Üretimi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, çevreci elektro lif çekimi yaklaşımı ile ultra saf su, gül suyu, lavanta suyu, etanol, asetik asit ve aseton gibi farklı çevreci çözücüler ile biyouyumlu polivinilpirolidon (PVP) nanoliflerin üretiminin gerçekleştirilmiştir. Polimer çözeltiler iletkenlik, yüzey gerilimi ve viskozite ölçümleri ile karakterize edilmiştir. Morfolojik analizler Taramalı Elektron Mikroskopu (SEM) ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. PVP/ultra saf su, gül suyu ve lavanta suyu çözeltilerinin iletkenlik, yüzey gerilimi ve viskozite sonuçları; benzer iken PVP/ asetik asit çözeltisi en yüksek viskoziteye ve en düşük iletkenlik değerlerine sahiptir. Diğer taraftan PVP/etanol çözeltisi en düşük yüzey gerilimine sahiptir. En düşük ortalama lif çapı; ultra saf su, gül suyu ve lavanta suyu ile elde edilmiştir fakat boncuklu lifler gözlenmiştir. En düzgün nanolifler PVP/etanol çözeltisinden elde edilirken, ortalama lif çapının 724 nm civarında, diğer PVP çözeltilerden daha kalın olduğu gözlenmiştir. Bu nedenle çalışmanın diğer kısmında lif morfolojisini geliştirmek için etanol yardımcı çözücü olarak seçilmiştir. Ayrıca, çözelti iletkenliği, lif çapı ve nanolifli yüzey çapı arasında ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiş ve iletkenlik arttıkça, lif çapının azaldığı, nanolifli yüzey çapının ise arttığı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Gül suyu,Lavanta suyu,Polivinilpirolidon,Çevreci çözücü,Çevreci elektro lif çekim yöntemi,Nanolif

Fabrication of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Nanofibers with Green Solvents

Abstract

In this study, biocompatible Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanofibers were produced with ultra-pure water, rose water, lavender water, ethanol, acetone and acetic acid with green electrospinning approach. Polymer solutions were characterized with conductivity, surface tension and viscosity measurements. Morphological analyzes were carried out with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Conductivity, surface tension and viscosity results of PVP/ ultra-pure water, rose water and lavender water solutions were similar. On the other hand, PVP/acetic acid solution has the highest viscosity and lowest conductivity values and PVP/ethanol solution has got the lowest surface tension. In addition; the lowest average fiber diameters were obtained from ultra-pure water, rose water and lavender water solvents but there are some beads on the nanofiber structure. The smoothest nanofibers without beads were obtained from PVP/ethanol but it was observed that average fiber diameter is about 724 nm higher than other PVP solutions. Therefore, ethanol was chosen as a co-solvent to enhance fiber morphology for second part of study. Moreover; the relation between solution conductivity, nanofiber diameter and web diameter were determined and it was found that nanofibrous surface diameter increases and fiber diameter decreases with the increase of solution conductivity.

Keywords

• Rose water,Lavender water,Green electrospinning,Polyvinylpyrrolidone,Green Solvent,Nanofiber

References

1. [1] D. A. Castilla-Casadiego, M. Maldonado, P. Sundaram, and J. Almodovar, “Green electrospinning of a collagen/hydroxyapatite composite nanofibrous scaffold,” MRS Commun., 6(4), 402-407, 2016.
2. [2] V. V. T. Padil, S. Wacławek, and M. Černík, “Green synthesis: nanoparticles and nanofibres based on tree gums for environmental applications,” Ecol Chem Eng S, 23(4), 533-557, 2016.
3. [3] T. Briggs, and T. L. Arinzeh, “Examining the formulation of emulsion electrospinning for improving the release of bioactive proteins from electrospun fiber,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 102 (3), 674-684, 2014.
4. [4] D. Prat, J. Hayler and A. Wells, “A survey of solvent selection guides,” Green Chem., 16 (10), 4546–4551, 2014.
5. [5] N. Bhardwaj, and S. C. Kundu, “Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique,” Biotechnol Adv., 28 (3), 325-347, 2010.
6. [6] A. K. Haghi, Advances in Nanofibre Research. Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire: Smithers Rapra, 2011.
7. [7] J.-H. He, Y. Liu, L.-F. Mo, Y.-Q. Wan, and L. Xu, “Electrospun nanofibres and their applications,” Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire: Ismithers Shawbury, 2008.
8. [8] R. Salehi, M. Irani, M. Eskandani, K. Nowruzi, S. Davaran, and I. Haririan, “Interaction, controlled release, and antitumor activity of doxorubicin hydrochloride from pH-sensitive P (NIPAAm-MAA-VP) nanofibrous scaffolds prepared by green electrospinning,” Int. J. Polym. Mater. Po., 63 (12), 609-619, 2014.

9. [9] R. Sridhar, S. Sundarrajan, A. Vanangamudi, G. Singh, T. Matsuura, and S. Ramakrishna, “Green processing mediated novel polyelectrolyte nanofibers and their antimicrobial evaluation,” Macromol. Mater. Eng., 299 (3), 283-289, 2014.
10. [10] X. Yang, L. Fan, L. Ma, Y. Wang, S. Lin, F. Yu, X. Pan, G. Luo, D. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Green electrospun Manuka honey/silk fibroin fibrous matrices as potential wound dressing,” Mater. Des., 119, 76-84, 2017.
11. [11] T. Uyar, and F. Besenbacher, “Electrospinning of uniform polystyrene fibers: The effect of solvent conductivity,” Polymer, 49 (24), 5336-5343, 2008.
12. [12] A. Çay, E. P. Akçakoca Kumbasar, and Ç. Akduman, “Effects of Solvent Mixtures on The Morphology of Electrospun Thermoplastic Polyurethane Nanofibres,” Journal of Textile & Apparel, 25(1), 38-46, 2015.
13. [13] R. Casasola, N. L. Thomas, A. Trybala, and S. Georgiadou, “Electrospun poly lactic acid (PLA) fibres: effect of different solvent systems on fibre morphology and diameter,” Polymer, 55 (18), 4728-4737, 2014.
14. [14] B. Veleirinho, M. F. Rei, and J. Lopes‐Da‐Silva, “Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly (ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats,” J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys., 46 (5), 460-471, 2008.
15. [15] L. Burke, C. J. Mortimer, D. J. Curtis, A. R. Lewis, R. Williams, K. Hawkins, T. G. G. Maffeis, C. J. Wright, “In-situ synthesis of magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticle-nanofibre composites using electrospinning,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 70, 512-519, 2017.
16. [16] D. Han, M. Sasaki, H. Yoshino, S. Kofuji, A. T. Sasaki, and A. J. Steckl, “In-vitro evaluation of MPA-loaded electrospun coaxial fiber membranes for local treatment of glioblastoma tumor cells,” J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Tec., 40, 45-50, 2017.
17. [17] R. Gharib, A. Najjar, L. Auezova, C. Charcosset, and H. Greige-Gerges, “Interaction of selected phenylpropenes with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine membrane and their relevance to antibacterial activity,” J. Membr. Biol., 250 (3), 259-271, 2017.
18. [18] Y.-N. Jiang, H.-Y. Mo, and D.-G. Yu, “Electrospun drug-loaded core–sheath PVP/zein nanofibers for biphasic drug release,” Int. J. Pharm., 438 (1-2), 232-239, 2012.
19. [19] B. Wang, M. Wang, M.-W. Chang, Z. Ahmad, J. Huang, and J.-S. Li, “Non-concentric multi-compartment fibers fabricated using a modified nozzle in single-step electrospinning,” Mater. Lett., 202, 134-137, 2017.
20. [20] L. Wang, M.-W. Chang, Z. Ahmad, H. Zheng, and J.-S. Li, “Mass and controlled fabrication of aligned PVP fibers for matrix type antibiotic drug delivery systems,” Chem. Eng. J., 307, 661-669, 2017.
21. [21] D.-G. Yu, X.-X. Shen, C. Branford-White, K. White, L.-M. Zhu, and S. A. Bligh, “Oral fast-dissolving drug delivery membranes prepared from electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone ultrafine fibers,” Nanotechnology, 20 (5), 055104, 2009.
22. [22] D. Yu, X. Wang, X. Li, W. Chian, Y. Li, and Y. Liao, “Electrospun biphasic drug release polyvinylpyrrolidone/ethyl cellulose core/sheath nanofibers,” Acta Biomater., 9 (3), 5665-5672, 2013.
23. [23] N. N. Maslakci, S. Ulusoy, E. Uygun, H. Çevikbaş, L. Oksuz, H. K. Can, and A. U. Oksuz, “Ibuprofen and acetylsalicylic acid loaded electrospun PVP-dextran nanofiber mats for biomedical applications,” Polym. Bull., 74 (8), 3283-3299, 2017.
24. [24] S. Torres-Giner, S. Wilkanowicz, B. Melendez-Rodriguez, and J. M. Lagaron, “Nanoencapsulation of Aloe vera in synthetic and naturally occurring polymers by electrohydrodynamic processing of interest in food technology and bioactive packaging,” J. Agric. Food. Chem., 65 (22), 4439-4448, 2017.
25. [25] S. Chuangchote, T. Sagawa, and S. Yoshikawa, “Electrospinning of poly (vinyl pyrrolidone): Effects of solvents on electrospinnability for the fabrication of poly (p‐phenylene vinylene) and TiO2 nanofibers,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 114 (5), 2777-2791, 2009.
26. [26] Q. Yang, Z. Li, Y. Hong, Y. Zhao, S. Qiu, C. Wang, and Y. Wei, “Influence of solvents on the formation of ultrathin uniform poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) nanofibers with electrospinning,” J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys., 42 (20), 3721-3726, 2004.
27. [27] M. H. Boskabady, M. N. Shafei, Z. Saberi, and S. Amini, “Pharmacological effects of Rosa damascena,” Iran J. Basic Med. Sci., 14 (4), 295-307, 2011.
28. [28] H. Kesici Güler, F. Cengiz Çallıoğlu, and E. Sesli Çetin, “Antibacterial PVP/cinnamon essential oil nanofibers by emulsion electrospinning,” J. Text. I., 110 (2), 302-310, 2019.
29. [29] F. Cengiz, and O. Jirsak, “The effect of salt on the roller electrospinning of polyurethane nanofibers,” Fiber Polym., 10 (2), 177-184, 2009.
30. [30] A. Haider, S. Haider, and I.-K. Kang, “A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology,” Arab. J. Chem., 11 (8), 1165-1188, 2015.
31. [31] S. Tan, R. Inai, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, “Systematic parameter study for ultra-fine fiber fabrication via electrospinning process,” Polymer, 46 (16), 6128-6134, 2005.
32. [32] S. Ramakrishna, K. Fujihara, W. Teo, T. Lim, and Z. Ma, “An Introduction to Electrospinning and Nanofibers,” London: World Scientific, 2005.