Farklı ışık kaynakları ile polimerize edilen kompozit, kompomer ve rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman materyallerinin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük düzeylerinin incelenmesi

Year 2007, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 17 - 23, 30.04.2009

Çiğdem Küçükeşmen D.Derya Öztaş H.Cenker Küçükeşmen Selim Erkut

Abstract

SüleymanDemirel Üniversitesi
TIP FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ: 2007 Haziran; 14(2)










Farklı ışık kaynakları ile polimerize edilen kompozit, kompomer ve rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman materyallerinin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük düzeylerinin incelenmesi



Çiğdem Küçükeşmen*, D. Derya Öztaş***, H. Cenker Küçükeşmen**, Selim Erkut****



* Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pedodonti AD, Isparta

** Ankara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Isparta

*** Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Isparta

**** Başkent Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Isparta





Özet



Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, halojen ve LED ışık kaynaklarıyla polimerize edilen iki kompozit rezin (Filtek Z-250, Filtek Supreme), iki kompomer (Compoglass F, Dyract AP) ve bir rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer siman (Vitrebond) materyallerinin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük düzeylerinin incelenmesidir. Örnekler 1mm kalınlığında ve 15mm çapındaki teflon kalıplarda hazırlandı ve üretici firmaların talimatları doğrultusunda farklı ışık kaynaklarıyla polimerize edildi (n=7). ISO 4049 ve ADA No.8 kriterlerine göre su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük testleri uygulandı. 7 gün suda bekletilen örneklerin sabit kütle ağırlıklarındaki değişiklikler, “mikrogram (µg)” olarak ölçüldü, su emilimi ve çözünürlük değerleri “µg/mm3” olarak hesaplandı. İki-yönlü ANOVA ve Duncan çoklu karşılaştırma testleriyle istatistiksel değerlendirme yapıldı. Kompozit ve kompomer materyallerin su emilimi ve çözünürlük değerleri arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05). Cam iyonomer simanla diğer materyaller arasında anlamlı farklılık bulundu (p<0.05). Kompozit ve kompomer materyallerin su emilimi ve çözünürlük düzeyleri arasında, ışık kaynakları bakımından istatistiksel farklılık gözlenmezken (p>0.05), cam iyonomer siman için gözlendi (p<0.05).



Anahtar kelimeler: Kompozit, kompomer, rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer siman, LED ışık kaynağı, su emilimi, suda çözünürlük.





Abstract





The investigation of levels of water sorption and water solubility of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement materials polymerized by different light sources.



The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of water sorption and water solubility of two resin composites (Filtek Z-250, Filtek Supreme), two compomers (Compoglass F, Dyract AP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond) polymerized by halogen and LED light sources. Samples were prepared in teflon molds with 1mm high and 15mm diameter and polymerized with different light sources according to the manufacturers' instructions (n=7). Water sorption and solubility tests were based on the ISO 4049 and ADA No.8 requirements. Weight changes of specimens were measured as “microgram (µg)” and calculated as “µg/mm3” after water immersion for 7 days. Data were analysed with two-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison test. There were not significant differences between composites and compomers according to sorption or solubility (p>0.05). Glass ionomer cement was found significantly different than the other materials (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between light sources according to composites and compomers (p>0.05), but it was found for GIC (p<0.05).



Key words: Composite, compomer, resin modified glass ionomer cement, LED light source, water sorption, water solubility.

Keywords

Kompozit, kompomer, rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer siman, LED ýþýk kaynaðý, su emilimi, suda çözünürlük

References

• Cobb DS, Macgregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based com posites: A comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1610- 5.
• Bayne S, Heymann H, Swift E. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 687-701.
• Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 330-6.
• Tirtha R, Fan PL, Dennison JB, Powers JM. In vitro depth of cure of photo-activated composites. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1184-7.
• Davidson-Kaban SS, Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Erdilek N. The effect of curing light variations on bulk curing and wall-to-wall quality of two types and various shades of resin composites. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 344-52.
• Ruyter IE, Øysæd H. Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982; 40: 179-82.
• Mc Cabe JF. Cure performance of light activated composites by differential thermal analysis (DTA). Dent Mater 1985; 1: 231-4.
• American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials. Specification No. 27 for direct filling materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 94:1191.
• Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21 st century. Quintessence
• Int 1993; 24(9): 641-58.
• McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int; 1994; 25: 587-9.
• Nicholson JW, Alsarheed M. Changes on storage of polyacid-modified composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 616-20.
• Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin MJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301.
• Hinoura K, Miyazaki M, Onose H. Dentin bond strength of light cured glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1542-4.
• Nicholson JW, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light-cured glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992; 173:98-101.
• Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 78-82.
• Elaine LD, Xinyi Y, Robert BJ, Gerard
• WJ, Louis G. Shear bond strength and microleakage of light- ionomers. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 127- cured glass 9 .
• Takahashi K, Emilson CG, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 350-4.
• Woolford MJ, Grieve AR. Release of fluoride from glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement subjected to radiant heat. J Dent 1995; 23: 233- 7.
• Burgess JO, Barghi N, Chan DC, Hummert T. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 137-41.
• Vitrebond, 3M Customer Hotline/MSDS Information 1-800-634-2249, 3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA, 2003.
• Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Usumez S, Ozturk B. The efficiency of different light sources to polymerize resin cement beneath porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 160-5.
• Eldeniz AU, Usumez A, Usumez S, Ozturk N. Pulpal temperature rise during ligth-activated bleaching. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 72B 2005; 254-9.
• Munksgaard EC, Peutzfeld A, Asmussan E. Elution of TED-DMA and BIS-GMA from a resin and a resin composite cured with halogen or plasma light. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 341. 24. Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Mills RW. Light emitting diode (LED) polymerization of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerization potential. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1379-85.
• Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 388-91.
• Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami JA. A ligth curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 359-66.
• Oberholzer TG, Pameijer CH, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ. Effect of power density on shrinkage of dental resin materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 622- 7.
• Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998; 26: 695-700. 29. Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Energy dependent polymerization of r esin-based composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 463-9.
• Yap A, Lee CM. Water sorption and solubility of resin-modified polyalkenoate cements. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 310-4.
• Örtengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter I E. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1106-15.
• Hinoura K, Onose H, Masutani S, Matsuzaki T, Moore BK. Volumetric change of light cured glass ionomer in water. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 222, Abstr. No.947.
• Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 71-8.
• Nitta Y, Yamada T, Morigami M, Hosoda H. Study on dental cement Part 5. Cryo-SEM observation on dentin-glass polyalkenoate cement interface. In: Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Torii M, Ebisu S. Weight change of various light- cured restorative materials after water immersion. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 132-7.
• Eliades G, Palaghias G. In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 198-203.
• Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Ouintessence Int 1995; 26: 351-8.
• Küçükeþmen HC, Küçükeþmen Ç, Öztaþ DD, Kaplan R. Farklý tiplerdeki geleneksel ve rezin- modifiye cam iyonomer simanlarýn su emilimi ve suda çözünürlüðü. AÜ Diþ Hek Fak Derg 2005; 32(1)Ê: 25-34.
• Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 21-32.
• Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Torii M, Ebisu S. Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 132-7.