Simüle Edilmiş Kanallarda Resiprokal Tek Eğe Sistemlerin Şekillendirme Yetenekleri: Reciproc ve Reciproc blue

Year 2021, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 145 - 150, 11.03.2021

İrem Çetinkaya , Mukadder İnci Başer Kolcu

https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.878545

Abstract

Amaç, simüle edilmiş rezin L-şekilli kurvatüre sahip kök kanallarında M-wire [Reciproc (VDW, Münih, Almanya)] ve mavi ısıl işlem görmüş [Reciproc Blue (VDW) eğelerin kanal düzleştirmesini karşılaştırmaktı. 45 ° kavisli ve 17 mm uzunluğunda (# 15-0.02 konik) toplam 26 simüle edilmiş L-şekilli kök kanalını taklit eden endodonitk eğitim blokları iki gruba ayrıldı (n = 13). Tüm kanallar, üreticinin talimatlarına göre 25 nolu apikal boyutta hazırlandı. Enstrümantasyon öncesi ve sonrası dijital fotoğraflar üst üste çakıştırılarak kanal kurvatüründeki düzleşme bir bilgisayar görüntüleme programı kullanılarak analiz edildi. Verilerin normal dağılımını belirlemek için Shapiro-Wilk testi kullanıldı. Kanal kurvatüründeki düzleşmeye göre iki grubu karşılaştırmak için bağımsız t-testi kullanıldı. Şekillendirme sırasında hiçbir alette kırık gözlenmedi. Orijinal kanal kurvatürü iki grup arasında önemli bir farklılık olmaksızın iyi korudu. Şekillendirme süresi ile ilgili olarak, iki sistem arasında önemli bir fark elde edilmedi (P> 0.05). Bu çalışmanın koşulları altında, aletlerin kullanımı güvenliydi ve tüm aletler orijinal kanal kurvatürünü çok iyi uyarak şekillendirmelerini sağladı. Mavi ısıl işlem görmüş veya görmemiş resiprokal hareket yapan eğelerin benzer hazırlık süresine ve kanal içi sıcaklıkta benzer şekillendirme yeteneklerine sahip olduğu ve kök kanal eğrilerini eşit derecede iyi koruduğu sonucuna varıldı.

Keywords

kanal kurvatürü, reciprokal hareket, simule kanal

Supporting Institution

Araştırmacılar çalışmayı kendıleri finanse etmiştir.

Shaping Ability of Reciprocating Single-file Systems in Simulated Canals: Reciproc versus Reciproc Blue

Abstract

The aim was to compare the canal straightening of M-wire [Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany)] and blue-wire heat-treated [Reciproc Blue (VDW) instruments in simulated resin L-shaped curved root canals. A total of 26 simulated L-shaped root canals with curvature of 45° and length of 17 mm (#15-0.02 taper) endo training blocks were divided into two groups (n = 13). All canals were prepared to an apical size 25 according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Pre- and post-instrumentation digital photography were superimposed and canal straightening was analysed using a computer imaging programme. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normal distribution of the data. For comparing two groups according to canal straightening independent t-test was used. During preparation no instrument fractured. All instruments maintained the original canal curvature well with no significant differences between the instruments. Regarding preparation time, no significant differences between the two instruments were obtained (P > 0.05). Under the conditions of this study, instruments were safe to use and all instruments respected the original canal curvature well. It was concluded that reciprocal motion files with or without blue-heat treated had similar preparation time and similar shaping abilities at intracanal temperature and maintained root canal curves equally well.

Keywords

canal curvature, reciprocal motion, simulated canal

References

• 1. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş AJJoe. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments. 2017;43(8):1360-3.
• 2. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda EJJoe. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. 2013;39(2):258-61.
• 3. Vahid A, Roohi N, Zayeri FJAEJ. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length. 2009;35(2):93-7.
• 4. Plotino G, Grande N, Testarelli L, Gambarini GJIEJ. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. 2012;45(7):614-8.
• 5. Kiefner P, Ban M, De‐Deus GJIej. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? 2014;47(5):430-6.
• 6. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics. 2013;39(2):258-61.
• 7. Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. International endodontic journal. 2012;45(9):802-6.
• 8. Topçuoğlu H, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu GJIej. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. 2017;50(7):713-7.
• 9. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GSJJoE. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. 2005;31(1):40-3.
• 10. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. International endodontic journal. 2012;45(5):449-61.
• 11. Bürklein S, Flüch S, Schäfer EJO. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue. 2019;107(1):96-102.
• 12. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon DJJoe. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. 2012;38(3):398-401.
• 13. Plotino G, Grande NM, Bellido MM, Testarelli L, Gambarini GJJoe. Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. 2017;43(2):200-2.
• 14. Zuolo A, Mello Jr J, Cunha R, Zuolo M, Bueno CJIEJ. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. 2013;46(10):947-53.
• 15. Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K, Uslu GJJodr, dental clinics, dental prospects. Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and Genius files in a double (S-shaped) curved canal. 2017;11(4):241.
• 16. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G, et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. 2017;43(3):462-6.
• 17. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner AJBrm. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. 2007;39(2):175-91.
• 18. Schneider SWJOs, Oral medicine, Oral pathology. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. 1971;32(2):271-5.
• 19. Keskin C, Demiral M, Sarıyılmaz EJRd, endodontics. Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. 2018;43(2).
• 20. Taşdemir T, Aydemir H, Inan U, Ünal OJIej. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K‐file assessed using computed tomography. 2005;38(6):402-8.
• 21. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes Jr DLJJoe. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. 1997;23(2):77-85.
• 22. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani BJJoe. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. 2015;41(10):1718-24.
• 23. Giuliani V, Di Nasso L, Pace R, Pagavino G. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. Journal of endodontics. 2014;40(9):1468-71.
• 24. Shen Y, Cheung GS-p, Bian Z, Peng BJJoE. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. 2006;32(1):61-5.
• 25. Avina Paranjpe B. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(2):101-8.
• 26. Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(10):1398-401.
• 27. Yoo Y-S, Cho Y-BJRD, Endodontics. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. 2012;37(4):220.
• 28. Thompson S, Dummer PJIEJ. Shaping ability of ProFile. 04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. 1997;30(1):8-15.
• 29. Thompson S, Dummer PJIej. Shaping ability of ProFile. 04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. 1997;30(1):1-7.
• 30. Shen Y, Zhou H, Coil JM, Aljazaeri B, Buttar R, Wang Z, et al. ProFile Vortex and Vortex Blue nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. 2015;41(6):937-42.
• 31. Sousa-Neto MDd, Silva-Sousa YC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Carvalho KKT, Barbosa AFS, Versiani MA, et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review. 2018;32.
• 32. Shen Y, Cheung GSJEt. Methods and models to study nickel–titanium instruments. 2013;29(1):18-41.
• 33. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow FJJoe. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. 2001;27(1):1-6.
• 34. Thompson M, Sidow SJ, Lindsey K, Chuang A, McPherson III JCJJoe. Evaluation of a new filing system's ability to maintain canal morphology. 2014;40(6):867-70.
• 35. Bürklein S, Jäger P, Schäfer EJIej. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo. 2017;50(10):983-90.
• 36. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Critical evaluation of root canal transportation by instrumentation. Endodontic Topics. 2013;29(1):110-24.
• 37. Silva EJNL, Tameirão MDN, Belladonna FG, Neves AA, Souza EM, De-Deus GJJoe. Quantitative transportation assessment in simulated curved canals prepared with an adaptive movement system. 2015;41(7):1125-9.
• 38. Saber S, Nagy M, Schäfer EJIEJ. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of W ave O ne, R eciproc and O ne S hape single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. 2015;48(1):109-14.
• 39. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(10):1394-7.
• 40. Alfadley A, Alrajhi A, Alissa H, Alzeghaibi F, Hamadah L, Alfouzan K, et al. Shaping ability of XP endo shaper file in curved root canal models. 2020;2020.