Çocuk diş hekimliğinde lokal anestezi ile ilgili YouTubeTM videolarının içeriklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2023, , 377 - 381, 21.08.2023

Kamile Nur Tozar , Merve Erkmen Almaz

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1133063

Öz

Öz
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, çocuklarda lokal anestezi ile ilgili YouTubeTM’daki videoların kalitelerini ve içeriklerini değerlendirerek hasta ve veliler için yararlı olup olmadığını analiz etmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: YoutubeTM’de "local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry" arama terimi kullanılarak, varsayılan filtre "alaka düzeyine göre sırala" olarak ayarlanmış bir arama gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmamızda, 213 videodan 113’ü, çalışmaya dışı bırakıldı ve 100 video analiz edildi. Video içerik sınıflaması için 23 puanlık bir skor ölçeği kullanılarak low, moderate ve high video içerikli video grupları olarak sınıflandırıldı.
Bulgular: Videoların büyük çoğunluğu sağlık profesyonelleri (n=93; 93%) kalanları ise sağlık şirketleri ve web sayfası (n=1; 1%) ve diğerleri (tv kanalları, haber ajansları) (n=6; 6%) tarafından yüklenmiştir. İlgili videolarının ortalama uzunluğu 9.49 dk’dır (range: 0.5-57.57 dk; median: 4.25).
Sonuç: Çocuklarda lokal anestezi ile ilgili YouTubeTM’da bir çok video bulunmasına rağmen bu videolar içerik açısından sınırlı bilgiler içermektedir. Diş hekimleri tarafından bu konu ile ilgili YouTubeTM videolarının kalitesinin artırılmasına ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Local anesthesia, pediatric dentistry, YouTubeTM

Evaluation of the content of YouTubeTM videos about local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry

Öz

Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assay the quality and substance of videos on YouTubeTM about local anesthesia in children and to assay whether they are practical for patients and parents.
Materials and Methods: A research was applied on YoutubeTM using the search term "local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry" with the assumed sorting set to "sort by relevance". In our study, 113 videos out of 213 were excluded and 100 videos were analyzed. For video content classification, a 23-point score scale was used to classify video groups as low, moderate, and high video context.
Results: Most of the videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals (n=93; 93%), while the rest were uploaded by healthcare companies/websites (n=1; 1%) and others (tv channels, news agencies) (n=6; 6%). The average duration of videos was 9.49 minutes (range: 0.5-57.57 minutes; median: 4.25).
Conclusion: Although there are many videos on local anesthesia in children on YouTubeTM, these videos contain limited information in terms of content. There is a requirement to develop the quality of YouTubeTM videos on this subject by dentists.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Local anesthesia, pediatric dentistry, YouTubeTM

Kaynakça

• 1. Trophimus GJ, Vignesh R, Shankar P. Local Anesthetics in Pediatric Dental Practice. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2019;12(8):4066-4070.
• 2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Use of local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry 2020;318-23.
• 3. Massir E, Palmon Y, Zilberman U. Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry. How Much is Enough? Dentistry 2018;8:480-483.
• 4. Ashkenazi M, Blumer S, Eli I. Effectiveness of computerized delivery of intrasulcular anesthetic in primary molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(10):1418-1425.
• 5. Berggren U, Meynert G. Dental fear and avoidance: causes, symptoms and consequences. JADA 1984;109(2):247-251.
• 6. Ayer WA. Psychology and Dentistry:Mental Health Aspects of Patient Care. 1th edn, Haworth Press; 2005. 15-34.
• 7. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 8th edn, St Louis, CV Mosby; 2004. 270-284.
• 8. Brunetto PC. Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Prog 2008;55:29-34.
• 9. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents' education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27(6):437-443.
• 10. Paksoy T, Gaş S. Quality and content of YouTubeTM videos related to sinus lift surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2020;33:48-52.
• 11. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Youtube TM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44(2):90-96.
• 12. Tozar KN, Yapıcı Yavuz G. Reliability of information on YouTube™ regarding pediatric dental trauma. Dent Traumatol. 2021 Jul 21. doi: 10.1111/edt.12708. Epub ahead of print.
• 13. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:152-5.
• 14. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. 2020.
• 15. Al-Silwadi FM, Gill DS, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ. Effect of social media in improving knowledge among patients having fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(2):231.
• 16. Hatipoğlu Ş, Gaş S. Is Information for Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Available on YouTube Reliable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(6):1-10.
• 17. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):208-214.
• 18. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol. 2015;49(2):189.
• 19. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G et al. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-2484.
• 20. Tian Y. Organ donation on web 2.0: content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube. Health Commun. 2010;25(3):238–246.
• 21. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(7):481-490.
• 22. Lopez-Jornet P, Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz-Roca JA. YouTube videos on oral care of the organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(4):1097-1101.
• 23. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):202-208.
• 24. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet F. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):196-201.
• 25. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49(12):1194-1200.
• 26. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-1783.
• 27. Altan Şallı G, Egil E. Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients? Quintessence Int. 2020;51(1):78-85.
• 28. Jayakaran TG, Vignesh R, Shankar P. Local anesthetics in pediatric dental practice. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019;12(8):4066 4070.
• 29. Troutman KC. Pharmacologic Management of pain and anxiety for pediatric patients, In: Wei SH, editor. Pediatric Dentistry Total Patient Care, Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febbiger; 1985;156 162.
• 30. Malamed SF. Anesthetic considerations in dental special-ties. In: Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis, Mo. Mosby; 2020;289-307.