Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the color stability and translucency of different composite resins subjected to various polishing procedures.
Methods: Three different composite resins (G-aenial Achord-GA, Charisma Topaz One-CTO, Charisma Bulk Flow One-CBF) and three different polishing procedures (Diamond Polish Mint, Lucida, and Super-Snap) were included in this study. Thirty samples of each composite resin were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n=10). Polishing procedures of the test groups were conducted. The baseline color values of all the samples were measured using a spectrophotometer. After a 14-day coffee immersion, color measurements were repeated. White and black background measurements were carried out before (TP001) and after coffee immersion (TP002) for translucency calculations. Data were analyzed using Jamovi v2.3.28. Robust ANOVA was used to compare the data that did not conform to normal distribution. Post-hoc comparisons were examined with the Bonferroni test. The significance level was set at p<0.05.
Results: The lowest and highest median ΔE00 values were observed in the GA-Lucida and CTO-Diamond groups, respectively. GA-Diamond had the lowest TP001 and TP002 values, whereas the highest values were observed in CTO-Super-Snap and CBF-Diamond groups, respectively. Charisma Bulk Flow One exhibited significantly lower total median ΔTP00 (p<0.05), and there was a statistical difference between GA and CTO (p<0.05).
Conclusions: GA generally had superior color stability, showing significantly lower discoloration compared to other tested composite resins. All tested composite resins showed varying degrees of decreased translucency after coffee staining.
Keywords: color stability, translucency, polishing paste, bulk-fill, single-shade
Keywords
Supporting Institution
None.
Project Number
None.
Ethical Statement
It is declared that during the preparation process of this study, scientific and ethical principles were followed and all the studies benefited are stated in the bibliography.
Thanks
None.
References
- 1. Ağaccıoğlu M, Yılmaz MN. The radiopacity of single‐shade composite resins: A comparative evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(3):527–33.
- 2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite - State of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38.
- 3. Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Khurshid Z. Smart monochromatic composite: A literature review. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:1–8.
- 4. Korkut B, Unal T. The assessment of the abrasiveness for resin composite finishing & polishing systems. Clin Exp Heal Sci. 2021;11(3):529–35.
- 5. Korkut B. Finishing, surface morphology, and polishing. Composite restorations in anterior esthetics. 2024. Quintessence, 400.
- 6. Korkut B, Alkan E, Öztürk EK, Türkmen C, Tağtekin D. Questioning the effectiveness of composite Polishing systems by crosschecking profilometer and dental microscope outcomes. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):21118.
- 7. Devlukia S, Hammond L, Malik K. Is surface roughness of direct resin composite restorations material and polisher‐dependent? A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(6):947–67.
- 8. Değirmenci A, Pehlivan IE, Değirmenci BU. Effects of polishing procedures on optical parameters and surface roughness of composite resins with different viscosities. Dent Mater J. 2023;42(2):199-210.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Restorative Dentistry
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
August 24, 2026
Submission Date
October 12, 2025
Acceptance Date
March 12, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 2
APA
Ağaccıoğlu, M., & Yılmaz, M. N. (2026). Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures. Selcuk Dental Journal, 13(2), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017
AMA
1.Ağaccıoğlu M, Yılmaz MN. Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures. Selcuk Dent J. 2026;13(2):178-183. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017
Chicago
Ağaccıoğlu, Merve, and Merve Nur Yılmaz. 2026. “Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures”. Selcuk Dental Journal 13 (2): 178-83. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017.
EndNote
Ağaccıoğlu M, Yılmaz MN (August 1, 2026) Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures. Selcuk Dental Journal 13 2 178–183.
IEEE
[1]M. Ağaccıoğlu and M. N. Yılmaz, “Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures”, Selcuk Dent J, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 178–183, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017.
ISNAD
Ağaccıoğlu, Merve - Yılmaz, Merve Nur. “Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures”. Selcuk Dental Journal 13/2 (August 1, 2026): 178-183. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017.
JAMA
1.Ağaccıoğlu M, Yılmaz MN. Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures. Selcuk Dent J. 2026;13:178–183.
MLA
Ağaccıoğlu, Merve, and Merve Nur Yılmaz. “Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures”. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 178-83, doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017.
Vancouver
1.Merve Ağaccıoğlu, Merve Nur Yılmaz. Optical Properties of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Investigation of Different Polishing Procedures. Selcuk Dent J. 2026 Aug. 1;13(2):178-83. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1802017