Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım

Mustafa Erhan Sarı; Sevgin İbiş

doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.310844

Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım

Abstract

Cam iyonomer simanların biyolojik uyumlulukları ve flor salma özellikleri ile diş hekimliğinde pek çok uygulama endikasyonu bulunur. Son yıllarda bu materyallerin fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerinin geliştirilebilmesi için, rezin modifiye cam iyonomerlere nano-boyutlu doldurucuların eklenmesi, cam partiküllerinin boyutunun azaltılması ve cam tozuna nano-boyutlu biyoseramiklerin sokulması gibi çeşitli yenilikler tanıtılmıştır. Bu yenilikler geleneksel cam iyonomerlerin mekanik özelliklerini, aynı zamanda flor salınımını ve biyoaktivitesini de arttırmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı bu yenilikleri gözden geçirmektir.

Anahtar kelimeler: adeziv diş hekimliği, cam iyonomer siman, nano teknoloji.

Keywords

cam iyonomer siman

References

1.Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry: The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972; 132:1335.
2. McLean JW. The clinical use of glass ionomer cements. Dental Clinic of North America 1992; 36:693-711.
3. Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, Gregoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15:229-37 4.Preston AJ, Mair LH, Agalamanyi EA, Higham SM. Fluoride release from aesthetic dental materials. J. Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:123-9.
5.Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23:343–62.
6. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985; 158:410–4.
7.Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997;10:18–20.
8. Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am J Dent 2000; 13:209–11.
9. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:87–95.

10. De Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:429-41.
11. Peumans M, de Munck J, Mine A, van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review Dent Mater 2014; 30:1089–103.
12. McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials 1998; 19:521–7.
13. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat. Nanotechnol 2010; 5: 565–9.
14. Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Qasim S, Shahab S, Naseem M, AbuReqaiba A. Advances in nanotechnology for restorative dentistry. Materials 2015; 8:717–31.
15. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Matinlinna JP, Siddiqui F, Nassani MZ, Baroudi K. Nanomodified peek dental implants: Bioactive composites and surface modification—A review. Int J Dent 2015; 381759.
16. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23:844–54.
17. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanotechnology and its role in caries therapy. Adv Dent Res 2012; 24:53–7.
18. Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposite resin system: Part 1-the evolution of contemporary composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004; 16:417–32.
19. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent. Mater 2009; 25:188–97.
20. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89:549–60.
21. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC). Acta Biomater 2008;4:432–40. 22.Moshaverinia A, Roohpour N, Chee WWL, Schricker SR. A review of powder modifications in conventional glass-ionomer dental cements. J Mater Chem 2011; 21:1319-28.
23. Shariq N, Zohaib K, Muhammad SZ, Abdul SK, Sana Z, Juan Manuel NM et al. Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:1134.
24. De Caluwe T, Vercruysse CW, Fraeyman S, Verbeeck RM. The influence of particle size and flüorine content of aluminosilicate glass on the glass ionomer cement properties. Dent. Mater 2014; 30:1029–38.
25. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Movasaghi Z, Billington RW, Darr JA, Rehman IU. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1381–90.
26. Ong JL, Chan DCN. Hydroxyapatite and their use as coatings in dental implants: A review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2000; 28:667-707.
27. Huang SB, Gao SS, Yu HY. Effect of nano-hydroxyapatite concentration on remineralization of initial enamel lesion in vitro. Biomed. Mater 2009; 4:034104.
28. Huang S, Gao S, Cheng L, Yu H. Remineralization potential of nano-hydroxyapatite on initial enamel lesions: An in vitro study. Caries Res 2011; 45:460–8.
29. Javed F, Vohra F, Zafar S, Almas K. Significance of osteogenic surface coatings on implants to enhance osseointegration under osteoporotic-like conditions. Implant Dent, 2014; 23:679–86.
30. Yap AUJ, Pek YS, Kumar RA, Cheang P, Khor KA. Experimental studies on a new bioactive material: Haionomer cements. Biomaterials 2002; 23:955–62.
31. Zakir M, Al Kheraif AAA; Asif M, Wong FSL, Rehman IUA. Comparison of the mechanical properties of a modified silorane based dental composite with those of commercially available composite material.Dent Mater 2013; 29:53–9.
32. Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M.Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2003; 24:3787–3794.
33. Lee JJ, Lee YK, Choi BJ, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Son HK, Hwang JW, Kim SO. Physical properties of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement modified with micro and nano-hydroxyapatite. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol 2010; 10:5270–6.
34. Gu YW, Yap AU, Cheang P, Kumar R. Spheroidization of glass powders for glass ionomer cements.Biomaterials 2004; 25:4029–35.
35. Moreau JL, Xu HH. Fluoride releasing restorative materials: Effects of pH on mechanical properties and ion release. Dent Mater 2010; 26:227–35.
36. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: Influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J. Dent 2011;39:589–98.
37.Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Sakagami H, Morales-Luckie RA, Nakajima H. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23:321–8.
38. Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Kanda Y, Nakajima H, Sakagami H. Effects of tio2 nano glass ionomer cements against normal and cancer oral cells. In Vivo 2014; 28:895–907.
39. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15:71–8.
40. Anusavice KJ, Zhang NZ, Shen C. Effect of CaF2 content on rate of fluoride release from filled resins. J Dent Res 2005; 84:440–4.
41. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16:129–38.
42.Mathis RS, Ferracane JL. Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989; 5:355–8.
43. Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F, Morrow BR, Jefferies SR.Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Clin Dent 2015;26: 23–7.
44. Lin J, Zhu J, Gu X, Wen W, Li Q, Fischer-Brandies H, Wang H, Mehl C. Effects of incorporation of nano-fluorapatite or nano-fluorohydroxyapatite on a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Acta Biomater 2001; 7:1346-53.
45.Moraes RR, Gonçalves LdS, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: Nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009; 34: 551–7.
46. Hefferren JJ, Koehler HM. Foods, Nutrition & Dental Health; Pathotox Publishers: Park Forest South, IL, USA. 1981.
47.Mitra SB, 1991. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res, 70:72–4.
48. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 71:1836–41.
49.Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, de Munck J, Neves AA, van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, et al. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 2009; 25:1347–57.
50. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: From first to sixth generation. J Am Dent. Assoc 2000; 131:20–5.
51. Nakaoki Y, Nikaido T, Pereira PNR, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Dimensional changes of demineralized dentin treated with hema primers. Dent Mater 2000; 16:441–6.
52. Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM.Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1983; 62:590–2.
53. Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin. Oper. Dent 2010; 35: 50–7.
54.El-Askary F, Nassif M. Bonding nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer to dentin using different self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 413–21.
55.Imbery TA, Namboodiri A, Duncan A, Amos R, Best AM, Moon PC.Evaluating dentin surface treatments for resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 2013; 38:429–38.
56. Hamama HH, Burrow MF, Yiu C. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives. Aust Dent J 2014; 59:193–200.
57.Sidhu SK, Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cement materials. A status report for the american journal of dentistry. Am J Dent 2001; 14:387–96.
58. Sauro S, Watson TF, Thompson I, Toledano M, Nucci C, Banerjee A. Influence of air-abrasion executed with polyacrylic acid-bioglass 45S5 on the bonding performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Eur J Oral Sci 2012; 120:168–77.
59. Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Scheffel DLS, Carvalho RM, Mazzoni, A. et al. The importance of size-exclusion characteristics of type i collagen in bonding to dentin matrices. Acta Biomater 2013; 9, 9522–8.
60.Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Ozge BC. Influence of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of novel light-curing nano-ionomer restorative to enamel and dentin. Lasers Med. Sci 2010; 25:861–6.
61. Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-Year results. Oper Dent 2012; 37:591–601.
62. El Wakeel AM, Elkassas DW, Yousry MM. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study. Eur J Dent 2015; 9:176–82.
63.Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998; 9:503–8.
64.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eichmiller FC, Schumacher GE. Physicochemical evaluation of bioactive polymeric composites based on hybrid amorphous calcium phosphates. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53:381–91.
65.Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. A fluoride-releasing composite for dental applications. Dent Mater 2001; 17:127–33.
66.Ullah R, Zafar MS, Al-Munawwarah AM, Arabia S. Oral and dental delivery of fluoride: A review. Fluoride 2015; 48:195–204.
67. Zafar MS, Ahmed N. Therapeutic roles of fluoride released from restorative dental materials. Fluoride 2015; 48:184–94.
68.Neelakantan P, John S, Anand S, Sureshbabu N, Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent 2011; 36:80–5.
69.Paschoal MAB, Gurgel CV, Rios D, Magalhães AC, Buzalaf MAR, Machado M.A.d.A.M. Fluoride release profile of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Braz Dent J 2011; 22:275–9.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Mustafa Erhan Sarı
ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, PEDODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI
Türkiye

Sevgin İbiş
Samsun Bafra Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Merkezi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Kliniği
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 1, 2019

Submission Date

May 6, 2017

Acceptance Date

May 31, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 6 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.310844

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA98TC34CG

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sarı, M. E., & İbiş, S. (2019). Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım. Selcuk Dental Journal, 6(2), 206-212. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.310844

AMA

1.Sarı ME, İbiş S. Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(2):206-212. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.310844

Chicago

Sarı, Mustafa Erhan, and Sevgin İbiş. 2019. “Modifiye Cam Iyonomer Simanlar: Güncel Bir Yaklaşım”. Selcuk Dental Journal 6 (2): 206-12. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.310844.

EndNote

Sarı ME, İbiş S (August 1, 2019) Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım. Selcuk Dental Journal 6 2 206–212.

IEEE

[1]M. E. Sarı and S. İbiş, “Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım”, Selcuk Dent J, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 206–212, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.15311/selcukdentj.310844.

ISNAD

Sarı, Mustafa Erhan - İbiş, Sevgin. “Modifiye Cam Iyonomer Simanlar: Güncel Bir Yaklaşım”. Selcuk Dental Journal 6/2 (August 1, 2019): 206-212. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.310844.

JAMA

1.Sarı ME, İbiş S. Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6:206–212.

MLA

Sarı, Mustafa Erhan, and Sevgin İbiş. “Modifiye Cam Iyonomer Simanlar: Güncel Bir Yaklaşım”. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2019, pp. 206-12, doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.310844.

Vancouver

1.Mustafa Erhan Sarı, Sevgin İbiş. Modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar: Güncel bir yaklaşım. Selcuk Dent J. 2019 Aug. 1;6(2):206-12. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.310844