Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığı

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde yaşayan bireylerde dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığının ve cinsiyetler arasındaki dental anomali görülme yatkınlıkların değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma Adıyaman Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi’ne ve Adıyaman Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Merkezi’ne çeşitli nedenlerle müracat etmiş 4256 hastaya ait panoramik radyografi görüntüleri üzerinde retrospektif olarak tasarlandı. Hastalara ait panoramik radyografi görüntüleri dental anomalilerin tespit edilmesi amacıyla 2 araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirildi.  Çalışmada hastaların panoramik radyografi görüntüleri üzerinde tespit edilen, alt keser diş eksikliği, sürnümerer diş, ektopi, gömülü kalma, mikrodonti, taurodontism ve dilaserasyon olmak üzere 7 tip dental anomali cinsiyetler arası dağılımına göre istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir.

Bulgular: En sık görülen anomali %4,2 oranıyla gömülü kalma olarak tespit edildi. Taurodontizm % 0,02 lik oranla en az görülen anomali olarak tespit edildi. Gömülü diş görülme sıklığı erkek bireylerde, kadınlara kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha fazla bulunmuştur. Ektopik diş görülme oranı, erkeklerde kadınlara nazaran istatistiksel olarak anlamı derecede fazla bulunmuştur. Kadınlarda alt keser diş eksikliği görülme oranı, erkeklere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede fazla bulunmuştur.

Sonuçlar: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde yaşayan bireylerde gömülü kalma, en sık rastlanılan anomali olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Alt keser diş eksikliği kadınlarda daha fazla görülürken, gömülü diş ve ektopiye erkeklerde daha sık rastlanılmıştır. Bunun yanında, sürnümerer diş, dilaserasyon, taurodontizm ve mikrodonti gibi anomalilerin görülme sıklığı bakımından cinsiyetler arasında farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Taurodontizm en az rastlanılan anomali olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental anomali, gömülü diş, ektopi, sürnümerer, alt keser

Keywords

• Dental anomali,gömülü diş,ektopi,sürnümerer

The incidence of dental anomalies in southeastern of Turkey

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of dental anomalies and tendency to dental anomalies among the sexes living in southeastern of Turkey.

Methods: This retrospective study was designed on panoramic radiographs of 4256 patients that applied to Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry and Adıyaman Oral and Dental Health Center. Panoramic radiographs of patients were evaluated by two investigators to determine dental anomalies. In the study, seven types of dental anomalies were analyzed statistically on the panoramic radiography images of the patients, including lack of lower incisor, supernumerary tooth, ectopia, impaction, microdontia, taurodontism and dilaseration.

Results: The most common anomaly was found to be impaction with a incidence of 4.2%. Taurodontism was found to be a least common anomaly with a incidence of 0.02%. The incidence of impaction was found to be significantly higher in male subjects compared to female. The incidence of ectopic teeth was significantly higher in males than in females. The incidence of lack of lower incisors was found to be significantly higher in females than males.

Conclusions: Impaction is the most frequently encountered anomaly in the individuals living in the southeastern of Turkey. Lack of lower incisor was more frequent in females, while impaction and ectopic tooth were more common in males. In addition, there is no statistically difference between the genders in terms of the frequency of anomalies such as supernumerary tooth, dilaseration, taurodontism and microdontia. Taurodontism was determined as the least common anomaly.

Keywords: Dental anomaly, impacted, ectopic, supernumerary, lower incisor

Keywords

• Dental anomaly,impacted,ectopic,supernumerary

References

1. Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009; 54(1): 3-17.
2. Garib DG, Alencar BM, Lauris JR, Baccetti T. Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and associated dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(732): 1-6.
3. Bedoya MM, Park JH. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1485-1493
4. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 328-335
5. Guan G, Wang Y, Lo T, Preston B Prevalence of tooth agenesis in orthodontic patient population in Western New York. N Y State Dent J 2013; 79: 31-35.
6. Küchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 941-946.
7. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 529-535.
8. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Class II division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 9-20.

9. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou MN, Komposch G. Congenital tooth anomalies and malocclusions: a genetic link? Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 145-151.
10. Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies,” Angle Orthod 1998; 68(3): 267-274.
11. Abe R, Endo T, Shimooka S. Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(6): 1002–1009.
12. Sofaer JA. Human tooth-size asymmetry in cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Arch Oral Biol 1979; 24(2): 141–146.
13. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(3): 436–441.
14. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van Der Linden FPGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32(3): 217–226.
15. Shapira Y, Finkelstein T, Shpack N, Lai YH, Kuftinec MM, Vardimon A. Mandibular second molar impaction. Part I: genetic traits and characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140(1): 32–37.
16. Ghaznawi H, Daas H, Salako N. A clinical and radiographic survey of selected dental anomalies and conditions in Saudi Arabian population. Saudi Dent J 1999; 11(1): 8–13.
17. Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of genetics in malocclusion. Br J Orthod 1999; 26(3): 195–203.
18. Ericson S, Kurol J. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod 2000; 70(6): 415–423.
19. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN dentistry 2012.
20. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53(2): 231-238.
21. Fernanda RDO, de Carli ML, Pedreira RDP, Ramos PDS, Pedreira MR, Robazza CRC, Hanemann JAC. Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients. J Oral Sci 2016; 58(1): 75-81.
22. Celebi F, Taşkan MM, Turkal M, Turkal HA, Holoğlu F. Orta karadeniz toplumunda dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığı. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2015; 18(4): 343-350.
23. Bäckman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11(1): 11–7.
24. Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17(3): 162–163.
25. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bachour Z, Parisis N, Tsirlis A. Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal 2011; 16(1): 56–61.
26. Luten JR. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth in primary and mixed dentitions. J Dent Child 1967; 34(5): 346–353.
27. Ferr´es-Padr´o E, Prats-Armengol J, Ferr´es-Amat E. A descriptive study of 113 unerupted supernumerary teeth in 79 pediatric patients in Barcelona. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal 2009; 14(3): 46–52.
28. Nicholls W. Dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate in Western Australia. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(2): 254.
29. Darwazeh AM, Hamasha AA, Pillai K. Prevalence of taurodontism in Jordanian dental patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 163-165.
30. Shifman A, Chanannel I. Prevalence of taurodontism found in radiographic dental examination of 1200 young adult Israeli patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978; 6: 200-203.
31. Mac Donald-Jankowski DS, Li TTL. Taurodontism in a young adult Chinese population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 140-144.
32. Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population. Eur J Dent 2010; 4(3): 263-269.
33. Nabavizadeh MR, Shamsi MS, Moazami F, Abbaszadegan A. Prevalence of root dilaceration in adult patients referred to Shiraz dental school (2005-2010). J Dent 2013; 14(4): 160.
34. Miloglu O, Cakici F, Caglayan F, Yilmaz AB, Demirkaya F. The prevalence of root dilacerations in a Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15(3): e441-e4.