CEREC CAD-CAM seramik overlay restorasyonların 24 ay izlem süresi: 3 Olgu sunumu

Abstract

Bu olgu sunumunda, arka bölge dişler için CAD-CAM tekniği ile üretilen overlay restorasyonların 24 aylık takibinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tüm overlay restorasyonlar feldspatik seramik bloklardan üretilmişlerdir. Sonrasında restorasyonlar ışınla ve kendi kendine sertleşebilen (dual cure) adeziv bir siman ile yapıştırılmışlardır. CAD-CAM sisteminin tercih edilmesi ile; tek bir seansta, estetik ve dişe benzer özellikler taşıyan indirekt restorasyonlar üretilmiştir. 12 ve 24 aylık klinik takipler sonucunda, yapıştırılan restorasyonlarda sekonder çürüğe, kırığa, renkleşmeye ve herhangi bir yapısal bütünlükte kayıba rastlanmamıştır. Ayrıca, CAD-CAM sistemi ile, hastalar kullanışlı, iyi uyum sağlayan ve dayanıklı indirekt restorasyonlara sahip olmuşlardır. 

Keywords

• CAD-CAM,daimi diş restorasyonu,overlay,seramik

24 months follow-up CEREC CAD-CAM ceramic overlay restorations: Report of 3 cases

Abstract

The objective of this follow-up case series report was to examine the overlay restorations of posterior teeth produced with CAD- CAM technique over a functional period of 24 months. All overlays were made from feldspathic ceramic blocks and cemented with a dual cure adhesive cement. In a single appointment, esthetic and tooth like indirect restorations were produced with CAD-CAM system. Clinical evaluation was done and follow-up after 12 and 24 months showed no secondary caries, fracture, discoloration and loosening of the structural integrity of all overlays. Also, with CAD-CAM system, the patients had convinent, well fitting and durable indirect restorations.

Keywords

• CAD–CAM,ceramic,overlay,permanent dental restoration

References

1. Batalha-Silva S, de Andrada MA, Maia HP, Magne P, 2013. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: Direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent Mater, 29(3), 324-331. Chabouis HF, Faugeron VS, Attal JP, 2013. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater, 29, 1209-1218. Chang C-Y, Kua J-S, Lin Y-S, Chang Y-H, 2009. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional postand core-supported CEREC crowns. JDS, 4(3), 110-117. Collares K, Correa MB, Laske M, Kramer E, Reiss B, Moraes RR, Huysmans M-C DNJM, Opdam NJM, 2016. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations. Dent Mater, 32, 687-694. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, 2000. Ceramic design concepts based on stress distribution analysis. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 21(8), 649-652. Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajto J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ, 2013. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig, 17(1), 177-183. Garlapati R, Venigalla BS, Kamishetty S, Thumu J, 2014. Ceramic onlay for endodontically treated mandibular molar. JOFS, 6(1), 69-72.