Tek Diş İmplant Restorasyonlarının Komşu Dişlerin Prognozu ve Peri-İmplant Trabeküler Kemiğin Fraktal Boyutuna Etkisi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Amaç: Tek diş posterior mandibula implantlarının komşu dişlerin sağkalımı, restoratif durumu, pulpa, periapikal ve periodontal sağlığı ve çevreleyen trabeküler kemik yapısı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tek diş implantlarına komşu 174 diş ve karşı tarafta 174 diş değerlendirildi. Dişlerin sağkalım ve restoratif, pulpal, periapikal ve periodontal durumları sayısal tanımlarla kaydedildi. İmplantın ve kontrol dişlerin mezial ve distal taraflarındaki trabeküler kemiğin fraktal boyutu (FD), implant yerleştirildikten sonra ve okluzal yüklemeden 1 yıl sonra elde edilen panoramik radyografilerde ölçüldü. Bulgular: İmplantlara komşu dişlerin çevresinde ölçülen FD değerleri başlangıca göre anlamlı olarak arttı (p <0,001); kontrol grubunda azalma gözlendi (p <0.001). Kontrol dişlerinin mezial ve distal bölgelerinde (p = 0,982) ve implantlara komşu dişlerde (p = 0,666) FD değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Minimal olarak restore edilmiş diş sayısındaki değişiklik bölgeler arasında fark göstermezken (p = 0.082), kontrol bölgesinde yoğun şekilde restore edilmiş diş sayısı implant tarafına göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p = 0.032). Sonuç: İmplantlara komşu dişler etrafındaki trabeküler kemiğin fraktal boyutu, implantların oklüzal yüklenmesinden sonra artarken, kontralateral tarafta azaldı. İmplantlara komşu dişlerin hayatta kalma, restoratif, periapikal ve periodontal koşulları oklüzal yüklemeden sonra minimal olarak değişti.

Keywords

• Kemik yeniden şekillenmesi
• fraktal
• panoramik radyografi
• tek diş implantı
• trabeküler kemik.

The Effect of Single-Tooth Implant Restorations on Prognosis of Adjacent Teeth and on Fractal Dimension of Peri-Implant Trabecular Bone: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effect of single posterior mandibular implants on the survival, restorative status, pulpal, periapical and periodontal health of the adjacent teeth and surrounding trabecular bone structure. Material and Method: A total of 174 teeth adjacent to single-tooth implants and 174 teeth on the contralateral side were assessed. Survival and restorative, pulpal, periapical, and periodontal status of the teeth were recorded using numerical definitions. Fractal dimension (FD) of the trabecular bone on the mesial and distal sides of the implant and control teeth were measured on panoramic radiographs obtained after implant placement and 1 year after occlusal loading. Results: FD values measured around the teeth adjacent to the implants were significantly increased compared to the baseline (p < 0.001); a decrease was observed in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the FD values in the mesial and distal regions of the control teeth (p = 0.982), and the teeth adjacent to the implants (p = 0.666). Change in the number of minimally restored teeth showed no difference between regions (p = 0.082), while the number of heavily restored teeth was significantly higher in the control region compared to the implant side (p = 0.032). Conclusions: The fractal dimension of the trabecular bone around the teeth adjacent to the implants increased after occlusal loading of the implants while decreased on the contralateral side. The survival, restorative, periapical, and periodontal conditions of the teeth adjacent to the implants changed minimally after occlusal loading.

Keywords

• Bone remodeling
• fractal
• panoramic radiography
• single-tooth dental implant
• trabecular bone.

References

1. 1. Carvalho W, Casado PL, Caúla AL, Barboza EP. Implants for single first molar replacement: important treatment concerns. Implant dentistry. 2004;13(4):328-335.
2. 2. Kumar Y, Chand P, Arora V, Singh SV, Mishra N, Alvi HA, et al. Comparison of Rehabilitating Missing Mandibular First Molars with Implant- or Tooth-Supported Prostheses Using Masticatory Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(5):376-380.
3. 3. Rinke S, Roediger M, Eickholz P, Lange K, Ziebolz D. Technical and biological complications of single-molar implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(9):1024-1030.
4. 4. Salinas TJ, Eckert SE. In patients requiring single-tooth replacement, what are the outcomes of implant- as compared to tooth-supported restorations? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:71-95.
5. 5. Tey VHS, Phillips R, Tan K. Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(5):620-625.
6. 6. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, Linden U, Lundqvist S, Rundcrantz T, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(5):462-467.
7. 7. Martin W, Lewis E, Nicol A. Local risk factors for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:28-38.
8. 8. Albrektsson T, Donos N. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:63-65.

9. 9. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):121-132.
10. 10. Duqum I, Barker S, Marshall E, Wang R, Preisser JS, Khan A. The effect of single tooth implant restorations on the survival, morbidity, pulpal, and periapical health of adjacent teeth: A chart review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):479-482.
11. 11. Krennmair G, Piehslinger E, Wagner H. Status of teeth adjacent to single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(5):524-528.
12. 12. Yamazaki S, Arakawa H, Maekawa K, Hara ES, Noda K, Minakuchi H, et al. Retrospective investigation of the remaining teeth status of patients with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in unilateral free-end edentulism. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(4):262-267.
13. 13. Gomez-Roman G. Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(1):61-67.
14. 14. Misch K, Wang HL. Implant surgery complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent. 2008;17(2):159-168.
15. 15. Sussman HI. Tooth devitalization via implant placement: a case report. Periodontal Clin Investig. 1998;20(1):22-24.
16. 16. Shabahang S, Bohsali K, Boyne PJ, Caplanis N, Lozada J, Torabinejad M. Effect of teeth with periradicular lesions on adjacent dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96(3):321-326.
17. 17. Yoon WJ, Kim SG, Jeong MA, Oh JS, You JS. Prognosis and evaluation of tooth damage caused by implant fixtures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(3):144-147.
18. 18. Terheyden H, Lang NP, Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration--communication of cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1127-1135.
19. 19. Stanford CM, Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(5):553-561.
20. 20. Matsunaga S, Shirakura Y, Ohashi T, Nakahara K, Tamatsu Y, Takano N, et al. Biomechanical role of peri-implant cancellous bone architecture. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(4):333-338.
21. 21. Ericsson I, Nilner K, Klinge B, Glantz PO. Radiographical and histological characteristics of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(1):20-26.
22. 22. Chen J, Zheng B, Chang YH, Shaw CC, Towers JD, Gur D. Fractal analysis of trabecular patterns in projection radiographs. An assessment. Invest Radiol. 1994;29(6):624-629.
23. 23. Yasar F, Akgunlu F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(1):1-9.
24. 24. Kursun-Cakmak ES, Bayrak S. Comparison of fractal dimension analysis and panoramic-based radiomorphometric indices in the assessment of mandibular bone changes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126(2):184-191.
25. 25. Updike SX, Nowzari H. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res. 2008;43(6):658-664.
26. 26. Zeytinoglu M, Ilhan B, Dundar N, Boyacioglu H. Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):519-524.
27. 27. Tozum TF, Dursun E, Uysal S. Radiographic Fractal and Clinical Resonance Frequency Analyses of Posterior Mandibular Dental Implants: Their Possible Association With Mandibular Cortical Index With 12-Month Follow-up. Implant Dent. 2016;25(6):789-795.
28. 28. Lee DH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Hong JU, Lee CW, Heo MS, et al. A clinical study of alveolar bone quality using the fractal dimension and the implant stability quotient. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40(1):19-24.
29. 29. Mu TJ, Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Changes in the fractal dimension of peri-implant trabecular bone after loading: a retrospective study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013;43(5):209-214.
30. 30. Kaimenyi JT, Ashley FP. Assessment of bone loss in periodontitis from panoramic radiographs. J Clin Periodontol. 1988;15(3):170-174.
31. 31. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(5):628-635.
32. 32. Kulczyk T, Czajka-Jakubowska A. A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site. 2018;2018:4357627.
33. 33. Suer BT, Yaman Z, Buyuksarac B. Correlation of Fractal Dimension Values with Implant Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Values at Implant Recipient Sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(1):55-62.
34. 34. Heo MS, Park KS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Koak JY, Heo SJ, et al. Fractal analysis of mandibular bony healing after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(6):763-767.
35. 35. Ilhan B, Güneri P, Saraçoglu A, Koca H, Boyacioglu H. A comparison of fractal dimension values of peri-implant bone and healthy contralateral side using panoramic radiographs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2015;3(1):1-6.
36. 36. Southard TE, Southard KA. Detection of simulated osteoporosis in maxillae using radiographic texture analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43(2):123-132.
37. 37. Chen SK, Chen CM. The effects of projection geometry and trabecular texture on estimated fractal dimensions in two alveolar bone models. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27(5):270-274.
38. 38. Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG. Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(5):270-275.
39. 39. Bianchi AE, Dolci G, Jr., Sberna MT, Sanfilippo S. Factors affecting bone response around loaded titanium dental implants: A literature review. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2005;3(3):135-140. 40. Wilding RJ, Slabbert JC, Kathree H, Owen CP, Crombie K, Delport P. The use of fractal analysis to reveal remodelling in human alveolar bone following the placement of dental implants. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40(1):61-72.
40. 41. Jung YH. Evaluation of peri-implant bone using fractal analysis. Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2005;35(3):121-125.
41. 42. Yasar F, Akgunlu F. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34(5):261-267.
42. 43. Ergun S, Saracoglu A, Guneri P, Ozpinar B. Application of fractal analysis in hyperparathyroidism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(5):281-288.
43. 44. Wang C, Fu G, Deng F. Difference of natural teeth and implant-supported restoration: A comparison of bone remodeling simulations. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2015;10(2):190-200.
44. 45. Priest G. Single-tooth implants and their role in preserving remaining teeth: a 10-year survival study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(2):181-188.
45. 46. Misch CE, Misch-Dietsh F, Silc J, Barboza E, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period: a retrospective report. J Periodontol. 2008;79(12):2378-2382.