Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Erzincan Bölgesinde Yaşayan Çocuklarda Üçüncü Molar Dişlerin Konjenital Eksikliğinin Araştırılması

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 380 - 384, 24.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.984105

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Erzincan bölgesindeki çocuk hastalar ait 1460 panoramik filmde üçüncü büyük azı dişlerinin konjenital eksikliklerinin retrospektif olarak belirlenmesi, cinsiyete ve çenelerdeki yerine göre dağılımının incelenmesi planlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma, etik onay alındıktan sonra Haziran 2018 - Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi’nde yapılmıştır. Üçüncü azı dişlerinin eksikliğini değerlendirmek için, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Bölümünü ziyaret eden 10-14 yaş arası 1460 hastaya ait (752 kadın ve 708 erkek) Panoramik Radyografiler incelenmiştir. İstatistiksel veriler SPSS 22 programında analiz edildi. 3. büyük azı dişlerinin konjenital eksikliklerinin yaygınlığını belirlemek için Pearson ki-kare testi uygulanmış, ayrıca gruplar arasındaki farklılıkları karşılaştırmak için tek yönlü ANOVA testi tercih edilmiştir.

Bulgular: 1460 hastadan üçüncü büyük azı dişlerinin konjenital eksikliklerinin prevalansı % 35.6 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sadece tek bir üçüncü molar dişi eksik olan toplam hasta sayısı 222 (% 15.5) idi. Kadınlarda üçüncü molar eksikliğinin prevalans oranı (% 38) erkeklere göre (% 33) daha yüksekti. Üst Çenede (% 57) alt çeneye(% 43) göre önemli ölçüde daha fazla üçüncü azı dişi eksik bulundu. 529 hastada (% 54) sadece sağ tarafta üçüncü molar eksikliği varken, 469 hastada (% 46) ise sadece solda üçüncü molar eksikliği vardı.

Sonuç: Üçüncü azı dişlerinin konjenital eksiklikleri Erzincan ilinde yaşayan çocuk hastalarda % 35.6 olarak bulunmuştur. Üçüncü molar eksikliği kadınlarda daha yaygın olarak tespit edilirken, maksillada mandibulaya göre daha fazla gözlemlenmiştir. İncelenen kişi sayısı artırılarak daha kapsamlı çalışmalar yapılabilir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Yazarlar bu çalışma için finansal destek almadıklarını belirtmişlerdir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Kaur B, Sheikh S, Pallagatti S. Radiographic assessment of agenesis of third molars and para-radicular third molar radiolucencies in population of age group 18-25 years old – A radiographic survey. Arch Oral Res 2012;8:13-18.
  • 2. Secic S, Prohic S, Komsic S, Vukovic A. Incidence of impacted mandibular third molars in population of Bosnia and Herzegovina: A retrospective radiographic study. J Health Sci 2013;3:151-158.
  • 3. Sujon MK, Alam MK, Rahman SA. Prevalence of third molar agenesis: Associated dental anomalies in non-syndromic 5923 patients. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162070.
  • 4. Endo S, Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Abe R, Endo T. Association between third molar agenesis patterns and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology 2015;103:89-96.
  • 5. Raloti S, Mori R, Makwana S, Patel V, Menat A, Chaudhari N. Study of a relationship between agenesis and impacted third molar (wisdom) teeth. Int J Res Med 2013;2:38-41.
  • 6. Bindayel NA. The role of third molar in orthodontic treatment. Pak Oral Dent J 2011;31:374-378.
  • 7. Koparal M, Ünsal HY, Alan HT, Yalçın M, Ege B, Gülsün B. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5:135-41.
  • 8. Garcıa-Hernandez F, Toro Yagui O, VegaVidal M, Verdejo Meneses M. Third molar agenesis in young people between 14 and 20 years of age, Antofagasta, Chile. Int J Morphol 2008;26:825–832.
  • 9. Lee SH, Lee JY, Park HK, Kim YK. Development of third molars in Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 2009;188(1–3):107 –111.
  • 10. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: Asystemic reviewandmeta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94(7):886–894.
  • 11. Alam MK, Hamza MA, Khafiz MA, Rahman SA, Shaari R, Hassan A. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting presence and /or agenesis of third molar tooth. PLoS ONE 2014;9(6):e101157.doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0101157 PMID:24967595
  • 12. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009;79:436-441.
  • 13. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res 1963;42:1344-1363.
  • 14. Büyük SK, Cantekin K, Şekerci AE, Doğan S. Bir grup Türk popülasyonunda üçüncü molar eksikliği ile ilişkili dental anomalilerin radyografik olarak değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;40:1-6.
  • 15. Daito M, Tanaka T, Hieda T. Clinical observations on the development of third molars. J Osaka Dent Univ 1992;26:91-104. 16. Barnett D. Late development of a lower third molar-a case report. Br J Orthod 1976;3:111-112.
  • 17. Hentisz AY. A Radiographic Study of Third Molar Agenesis in a Sample from the American Midsouth. [thesis]. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee; 2003.
  • 18. John J, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Mohamed NH, Ahmad NF, Murad NA. Third molar agenesis among children and youths from three major races of Malaysians. J Dent Sci 2012;7(3):211–217.
  • 19. Rozkovcova E, Markova M ,Lanik J, Zvarova J. Agenesis of third molars in young Czech population. Prague Med Rep 2004;105(1):35–52.
  • 20. Tan SPK, van Wijk AJ, Prahl‑Andersen B. Severe hypodontia: Identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:150‑154.
  • 21. Abu‑Hussein M, Watted N, Yehia M, Proff P, Iraqi F. Clinical genetic basis of tooth agenesis. IOSR‑JDMS 2015;14:68‑77.
  • 22. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Oktay H. Third-molar agenesis among patients from the East Anatolian Region of Turkey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010;11:33-40.
  • 23. Rahardjo P. Prevalence of hypodontia in Chinese orthodontic population. Dent J Majalah Kedokt Gig 2006;39:147-150.
  • 24. Tavajohi-Kermani H, Kapur R, Sciote JJ. Tooth agenesis and craniofacial morphology in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:39-47.

Investigation of Congenital Agenesis of Third Molar Teeth in Children Living in Erzincan Region

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 380 - 384, 24.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.984105

Öz

Background:In this study, it was planned to retrospectively determine the congenital deficiencies of the third molars in 1460 panoramic films of pediatric patients in the Erzincan region and to examine the distribution according to gender and location in the jaws.

Methods:This retrospective study was conducted at Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Faculty of Dentistry from June 2018 - January 2020. 1460 patients(752 females and 708 males) between the ages of 10-14 were studied with panoramic radiograph to assess for agenesis of mandibular third molars. Statistical data were analyzed in SPSS 22 program. The Pearson chi-square test was performed for determining the prevalence of congenitally agenesis of the third molar teeth.

Results:The prevalence of third molar teeth agenesis was 35.6 %. Total numbers of patients with single third molar missing were 222(15.5 %). The ratio of the prevalence of third molar agenesis for females(38 %) was higher than that for males(33 %). Significantly more third-molar teeth were found to be missing from the maxilla(57 %) than the mandible(43 %). 529 patients(54 %) had agenesis only on the right side and 469 patients(46 %) had agenesis only on the left.

Conclusion:The agenesis of the third molars was investigated in pediatric patients living in Erzincan province and its prevalence was found 35.6 %. Congenital deficiency of the third molar teeth is more common in women, while it has been observed more in the maxilla than in the mandible. More comprehensive studies can be done by increasing the number of individuals examined.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Kaur B, Sheikh S, Pallagatti S. Radiographic assessment of agenesis of third molars and para-radicular third molar radiolucencies in population of age group 18-25 years old – A radiographic survey. Arch Oral Res 2012;8:13-18.
  • 2. Secic S, Prohic S, Komsic S, Vukovic A. Incidence of impacted mandibular third molars in population of Bosnia and Herzegovina: A retrospective radiographic study. J Health Sci 2013;3:151-158.
  • 3. Sujon MK, Alam MK, Rahman SA. Prevalence of third molar agenesis: Associated dental anomalies in non-syndromic 5923 patients. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162070.
  • 4. Endo S, Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Abe R, Endo T. Association between third molar agenesis patterns and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology 2015;103:89-96.
  • 5. Raloti S, Mori R, Makwana S, Patel V, Menat A, Chaudhari N. Study of a relationship between agenesis and impacted third molar (wisdom) teeth. Int J Res Med 2013;2:38-41.
  • 6. Bindayel NA. The role of third molar in orthodontic treatment. Pak Oral Dent J 2011;31:374-378.
  • 7. Koparal M, Ünsal HY, Alan HT, Yalçın M, Ege B, Gülsün B. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5:135-41.
  • 8. Garcıa-Hernandez F, Toro Yagui O, VegaVidal M, Verdejo Meneses M. Third molar agenesis in young people between 14 and 20 years of age, Antofagasta, Chile. Int J Morphol 2008;26:825–832.
  • 9. Lee SH, Lee JY, Park HK, Kim YK. Development of third molars in Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 2009;188(1–3):107 –111.
  • 10. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: Asystemic reviewandmeta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94(7):886–894.
  • 11. Alam MK, Hamza MA, Khafiz MA, Rahman SA, Shaari R, Hassan A. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting presence and /or agenesis of third molar tooth. PLoS ONE 2014;9(6):e101157.doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0101157 PMID:24967595
  • 12. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009;79:436-441.
  • 13. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res 1963;42:1344-1363.
  • 14. Büyük SK, Cantekin K, Şekerci AE, Doğan S. Bir grup Türk popülasyonunda üçüncü molar eksikliği ile ilişkili dental anomalilerin radyografik olarak değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;40:1-6.
  • 15. Daito M, Tanaka T, Hieda T. Clinical observations on the development of third molars. J Osaka Dent Univ 1992;26:91-104. 16. Barnett D. Late development of a lower third molar-a case report. Br J Orthod 1976;3:111-112.
  • 17. Hentisz AY. A Radiographic Study of Third Molar Agenesis in a Sample from the American Midsouth. [thesis]. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee; 2003.
  • 18. John J, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Mohamed NH, Ahmad NF, Murad NA. Third molar agenesis among children and youths from three major races of Malaysians. J Dent Sci 2012;7(3):211–217.
  • 19. Rozkovcova E, Markova M ,Lanik J, Zvarova J. Agenesis of third molars in young Czech population. Prague Med Rep 2004;105(1):35–52.
  • 20. Tan SPK, van Wijk AJ, Prahl‑Andersen B. Severe hypodontia: Identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:150‑154.
  • 21. Abu‑Hussein M, Watted N, Yehia M, Proff P, Iraqi F. Clinical genetic basis of tooth agenesis. IOSR‑JDMS 2015;14:68‑77.
  • 22. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Oktay H. Third-molar agenesis among patients from the East Anatolian Region of Turkey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010;11:33-40.
  • 23. Rahardjo P. Prevalence of hypodontia in Chinese orthodontic population. Dent J Majalah Kedokt Gig 2006;39:147-150.
  • 24. Tavajohi-Kermani H, Kapur R, Sciote JJ. Tooth agenesis and craniofacial morphology in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:39-47.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm Araştırma
Yazarlar

Serhat Karaca 0000-0003-1588-1480

Belen Şirinoğlu Çapan 0000-0003-1829-0379

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Ağustos 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 17 Ağustos 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Karaca S, Şirinoğlu Çapan B. Investigation of Congenital Agenesis of Third Molar Teeth in Children Living in Erzincan Region. Selcuk Dent J. 2022;9(2):380-4.