Primer perkütan koroner girişim uygulanan ST segment yükselmeli miyokardiyal enfarktüs (STEMI) hastalarında P2Y12 inhibitörlerinin trombüs yüküne etkisi

Abstract

GİRİŞ VE AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada, ST segment yükselmesi miyokardiyal enfarktüsü (STEMI) tanısıyla acil servise başvuran ve primer perkütan koroner girişim (PCI) uygulanan hastalarda, hastaneye kabul edildiklerinde verilen P2Y12 inhibitörlerinin, culprit lezyondaki trombus skoru üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. MATERYAL VE METOT: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, STEMI tanısı alan ve primer PCI uygulanan ve göğüs ağrısının başlangıcından sonraki 2 saat içinde başvuran 225 hastada farklı P2Y12 inhibitörlerinin, pre-prosedür trombus yüküne etkilerinin karşılaştırması planlandı. BULGULAR: Çalışmamıza toplam 225 hasta dahil edildi. Bu hastalardan 72'sine klopidogrel, 85'ine tikagrelor ve 68'ine prasugrel verilmişti. Girişim öncesi Grade 5 trombus skoru, tikagrelor grubunda diğer gruplara göre belirgin olarak daha düşüktü (Klopidogrel %77.78, Tikagrelor %61.18, Prasugrel %77.94; p=0.017). SONUÇLAR: Çalışmamızda, girişim öncesi yüklenen P2Y12 inhibitörleri arasında, tikagrelorun trombus yükü açısından üstün olduğu belirlendi. Bu sonuçların, tikagrelorun erken başlangıçlı antiplatelet etkisi ile ilişkili olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• st segment yükselmeli miyokardiyal enfarktüs
• tikagrelor
• prasugrel
• klopidogrel
• trombüs skoru

Impact of P2Y12 Inhibitors on Thrombus Burden in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of P2Y12 inhibitors administered at the time of admission to the emergency department in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention on the thrombus score in the culprit lesion. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study planned to compare the pre-procedural thrombus scores of 225 patients who presented with STEMI underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and received different P2Y12 inhibitors within 2 hours after the onset of chest pain. Results: A total of 225 patients were included in our study. Among them, 72 patients received clopidogrel, 85 received ticagrelor, and 68 received prasugrel as the P2Y12 inhibitor. The pre-procedural Grade 5 thrombus was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group compared to the other groups (Clopidogrel 77.78%, Ticagrelor 61.18%, Prasugrel 77.94%; p=0.017). Conclusions: In our study, ticagrelor among the pre-procedurally loaded P2Y12 inhibitors was found to be superior in terms of early thrombus intensity, and these results are thought to be associated with the early onset antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor.

Keywords

• ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
• Clopidogrel
• Prasugrel
• Ticagrelor
• Thrombus score

References

1. Davies MJ, Thomas A. Thrombosis and acute coronaryartery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N Engl J Med. 1984 May 3;310(18):1137-40. PMID: 6709008.
2. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Serruys PW. Angiographic thrombus burden classification in patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Oct;22(10 Suppl B):6B-14B. PMID: 20947930.
3. Robert A Byrne, Xavier Rossello, J J Coughlan, Emanuele Barbato, Colin Berry, Alaide Chieffo, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group , 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: Developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal, Volume 44, Issue 38, 7 October 2023, Pages 3720–3826
4. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, et al. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 14;50(7):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059. Epub 2007 Jul 30. PMID: 17692740.
5. Joost A, Stiermaier T, Eitel C, Fuernau G, Waha S, Desch S, et al. Impact of Initial Culprit Vessel Flow on Infarct Size, Microvascular Obstruction, and Myocardial Salvage in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol . 2016 Nov 1;118(9):1316-1322.
6. Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al.; TIMI Study Group. Combination therapy with abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction: A TIMI 14 substudy. Circulation. 2001 May 29;103(21):2550-4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.21.2550. PMID: 11382722.
7. Borja Ibanez, Stefan James, Stefan Agewall, Manuel J Antunes, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group , 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal, Volume 39, Issue 2, 07 January 2018, Pages 119–177
8. Nylander S, Femia EA, Scavone M, Berntsson P, Asztély AK, Nelander K, et al. Ticagrelor inhibits human platelet aggregation via adenosine in addition to P2Y12 antagonism. J Thromb Haemost 2013;11:1867‑76.

9. Teng R, Oliver S,Hayes MA,Butler K. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ticagrelor in healty subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1514-1521
10. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Tantry US, Gesheff T,Wei C, Teng R, et al. . Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The ONSET/OFFSET Study. Circulation. 2009;120:2577-2585.
11. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. PLATO Investigators Freij A, Thorsen M. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361(11):1045– 1057
12. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, Kassimis G, Theodoropoulos KC, Makris G, et al. Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients with ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCirc Cardiovasc Interv.2012;5:797-804;
13. Giorgi MA, Cohen Arazi H, Gonzalez CD, Di Girolano G. Beyond efficancy: Pharmatocinetic differencez between clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12:1285-1295
14. Storey RF, Angiolillo DJ, Patil SB , Desai B,Ecob R,Husted S, Emanuelson H, et al. Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The PLATO(PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1456- 1462.
15. G. Lemesle, G. Schurtz, C. Bauters, M. Hamon. High ontreatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Volume 13, Issue 6. 2015. Pages 931-942. ISSN 1538-7836.
16. Montalescot G, van ’t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, Silvain J, Lassen JF, Bolognese L, et al. ATLANTIC Investigators. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2014;371(11):1016– 1027
17. Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, Mayer K, Bernlochner I, Wöhrle J, et al; ISAR-REACT 5 Trial Investigators. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1. PMID: 31475799.