Comparative Effects of Natural, Surgical, and Premature Menopause on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Depression
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare quality of life, depression levels, and sexual function among women with natural, surgical, and premature menopause.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between July and October 2018 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital. A total of 315 women were included and categorized according to menopausal type as natural (n = 164), surgical (n = 100), or premature menopause (n = 51). Data were collected using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
Results: The mean age of the participants was 50.09 ± 6.26 years. Depression was identified in 23.8% of the women, with no statistically significant difference observed among menopause groups. Although no significant differences were found in total MENQOL scores, vasomotor symptom scores were significantly higher in the surgical menopause group compared with the natural and premature menopause groups (p < 0.05). Total FSFI scores were significantly higher in the premature menopause group than in the other groups, whereas no significant difference was observed between the natural and surgical menopause groups. FSFI subdomain scores for desire and pain did not differ significantly among the three groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Differences in quality of life, depression levels, and sexual function were observed across menopausal types, reflecting the influence of menopausal etiology and timing. These findings highlight the need for individualized approaches to improve quality of life, sexual health, and psychological well-being in menopausal women.
Keywords
Project Number
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Hamoda H, Sharma A. Premature ovarian insufficiency, early menopause, and induced menopause. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;38(1):101823. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2023.101823.
- Crandall CJ, Mehta JM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms: a review. JAMA. 2023;329(5):405-20. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.24140.
- Allshouse A, Pavlovic J, Santoro N. Menstrual cycle hormone changes associated with reproductive aging and how they may relate to symptoms. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(4):613–28. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.004.
- Avis NE, Crawford S, Stellato R, Longcope C. Longitudinal study of hormone levels and depression among women transitioning through menopause. Climacteric. 2001;4(3):243–9.
- Almeida OP, Marsh K, Flicker L, Hickey M, Sim M, Ford A. Depressive symptoms in midlife: the role of reproductive stage. Menopause. 2016;23(6):669-75. doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000598.
- McCoy NL, Davidson JM. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on sexuality. Maturitas. 1985;7(3):203–10. doi:10.1016/0378-5122(85)90041-6.
- Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, Van Maris B, Ross A, Franssen E, et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996;24(3):161–75. doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(96)82006-8.
- Şahin NH, Kharbouch SB. Determination of the quality of life during menopausal stages. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2007;15(59):82-90.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Funda Muhtaroğlu
0000-0002-4037-8812
Türkiye
Hilal Uslu Yuvacı
0000-0001-8067-3165
Türkiye
Nermin Akdemir
0000-0002-9129-2103
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
June 24, 2026
Publication Date
June 30, 2026
Submission Date
December 23, 2025
Acceptance Date
May 4, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 16 Number: 2