Maternal and Fetal Outcomes After Sugammadex Use in Pregnant Patients Undergoing Non-Obstetric Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: Sugammadex has been widely studied in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. However, the use of sugammadex for non-obstetric surgery in pregnant women has not been clearly defined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of sugammadex on the mother and fetus in pregnant women undergoing non-obstetric surgery.
Methods: Pregnant women who underwent non-obstetric surgery between January 2017 and December 2022 under general anesthesia and received sugammadex were included in this retrospective cohort study. Postoperative maternal and fetal complications, delivery method, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.
Results: In total, 26 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 28.46±5.99, and the mean gestational age at the time of operation was 17.29 ± 7.31. The mean anesthesia duration was 69.46 ± 20.85 minutes. The mean delivery week was 38.23 ± 2.66 weeks. The cesarean delivery rate was 61 %. No abortion or preterm delivery occurred within two weeks after sugammadex usage. The mean neonatal weight was 2940 ± 799 grams, and height was 48.75 ± 3,97 cm. No teratogenic effect was observed.
Conclusions: In this small retrospective cohort, no serious maternal or fetal complications that may be associated with sugammadex have been observed within two weeks of administration. Larger multicenter controlled studies are needed to prove the safety of sugammadex in early pregnancy.
Keywords
References
- Hristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8(8):CD012763. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012763.
- Stourac P, Adamus M, Seidlova D, Pavlik T, Janku P, Krikava I, et al. Low-dose or high-dose rocuronium reversed with neostigmine or sugammadex for cesarean delivery anesthesia: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of time to tracheal intubation and extubation. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(5):1536-45. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001197.
- Varela N, Lobato F. Sugammadex and pregnancy, is it safe?. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(2):183-4. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.11.015.
- Bridion [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc.; 2015. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/022225lbl.pdf
- Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology [cited 2019 July 31]. Available from: https://soap.org/wp-content /uploads/2019/06/SOAP
- Torres SM, Duarte DF, Glória AS, Reis C, Moreira JF, Cunha S, et al. Sugammadex administration in pregnant patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery: a case series. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72(4):525-528. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.034.
- Singh S, Klumpner TT, Pancaro C, Rajala B, Kountanis JA. Sugammadex administration in pregnant women: a case series of maternal and fetal outcomes. A A Pract. 2021;15(2):e01407. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001407.
- Williamson RM, Mallaiah S, Barclay P. Rocuronium and sugammadex for rapid sequence induction of obstetric general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55(6):694-9. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02431.x.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Anaesthesiology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ali Eman
*
0000-0001-7251-1828
Türkiye
Onur Balaban
0009-0009-1829-2041
Türkiye
Ayça Taş Tuna
0000-0001-6764-2647
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
June 15, 2026
Publication Date
-
Submission Date
October 30, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 26, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication