Research Article

Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study

Volume: 16 Number: 3 September 30, 2026
EN

Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study

Abstract

Objective: Plantar fasciitis is a common degenerative condition causing chronic heel pain and functional limitation. Corticosteroid injections are widely used but carry potential adverse effects, whereas ozone therapy has emerged as an alternative with anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties.The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid and ozone injections on pain, function, and quality of life in chronic plantar fasciitis.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 59 patients unresponsive to conservative treatment. Patients received either a single corticosteroid injection (Group S, n=30) or three weekly ozone injections (Group O, n=29). Outcomes were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Treatment response was defined as ≥50% reduction in NRS.
Results: Both groups showed significant improvement over time (p<0.001). Pain reduction was similar at 1 month. At 3 months, corticosteroids resulted in lower NRS scores (p=0.024) and higher responder rates (70.0% vs. 31.0%, p=0.003). Corticosteroids provided greater short-term functional improvement, whereas ozone showed superior FFI scores at 3 months (p<0.001). SF-12 physical scores improved similarly; mental scores favored corticosteroids (p=0.025). No serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusions: Both injections effectively improve pain, function, and quality of life in plantar fasciitis. Corticosteroids provide superior pain relief, while ozone may offer better long-term functional improvement. Treatment selection should be individualized based on clinical priorities.

Keywords

Project Number

E-43012747-050.04-481636-361

Ethical Statement

Prior to the start of the study, ethical approval was obtained from the university ethics committee under the protocol number E-43012747-050.04-481636-361.

References

  1. Lemont H, Ammirati KM, Usen N. Plantar fasciitis: a degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003 May-Jun;93(3):234-7. doi:10.7547/87507315-93-3-234.
  2. Liebmann K, Kimbrough DW, Best TM, Kouroupis D, Rodriguez Materon S. Plantar fasciitis pathophysiology and the potential role of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as therapy. Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 23;13(7):1528. doi:10.3390/biomedicines13071528.
  3. Nahin RL. Prevalence and pharmaceutical treatment of plantar fasciitis in united states adults. J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):885-96. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.03.003.
  4. Hansen L, Krogh TP, Ellingsen T, Bolvig L, Fredberg U. Long-term prognosis of plantar fasciitis: a 5- to 15-year follow-up study of 174 patients with ultrasound examination. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):2325967118757983. doi:10.1177/2325967118757983.
  5. Tseng WC, Chen YC, Lee TM, Chen WS. Plantar fasciitis: an updated review. J Med Ultrasound. 2023 Oct 6;31(4):268-74. doi:10.4103/jmu.jmu_2_23.
  6. Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011 Sep 15;84(6):676-82.
  7. Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Mendicino RW, Schuberth JM, Vanore JV, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: a clinical practice guideline-revision 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 May-Jun;49(3 Suppl):S1-19. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2010.01.001.
  8. Guimarães JS, Arcanjo FL, Leporace G, Metsavaht LF, Conceição CS, Moreno MVMG, et al. Effects of therapeutic interventions on pain due to plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2023 Jun;37(6):727-46. doi:10.1177/02692155221143865.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pain

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 25, 2026

Publication Date

September 30, 2026

Submission Date

May 4, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 12, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 16 Number: 3

APA
Işık, R., Uzun, E., & Şahin, M. Z. (2026). Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study. Sakarya Medical Journal, 16(3), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.1941428
AMA
1.Işık R, Uzun E, Şahin MZ. Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2026;16(3):398-407. doi:10.31832/smj.1941428
Chicago
Işık, Rıdvan, Emre Uzun, and Muhammed Zahid Şahin. 2026. “Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study”. Sakarya Medical Journal 16 (3): 398-407. https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.1941428.
EndNote
Işık R, Uzun E, Şahin MZ (September 1, 2026) Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study. Sakarya Medical Journal 16 3 398–407.
IEEE
[1]R. Işık, E. Uzun, and M. Z. Şahin, “Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study”, Sakarya Medical Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 398–407, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.31832/smj.1941428.
ISNAD
Işık, Rıdvan - Uzun, Emre - Şahin, Muhammed Zahid. “Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study”. Sakarya Medical Journal 16/3 (September 1, 2026): 398-407. https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.1941428.
JAMA
1.Işık R, Uzun E, Şahin MZ. Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2026;16:398–407.
MLA
Işık, Rıdvan, et al. “Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study”. Sakarya Medical Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 398-07, doi:10.31832/smj.1941428.
Vancouver
1.Rıdvan Işık, Emre Uzun, Muhammed Zahid Şahin. Corticosteroid Versus Ozone Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Clinical Study. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2026 Sep. 1;16(3):398-407. doi:10.31832/smj.1941428

INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiU2NvcHVzLnBuZyIsInBhdGgiOiI5NzZkLzU5ZjkvMjAyMC82YTkxMmNmOGRiMTQzMS44MDUwMjExMS5wbmciLCJleHAiOjE3ODc5MDI3MjksIm5vbmNlIjoiMGM1Y2FmMmZlZjRlYWIyMTEyMGVjYjUyZTU2NWEyMzAifQ.c7PzOMe8mvOEUJa4kmFHwDEXwzC93EDJLv4c7YpMba0  29985  30950  30951 30954 34273
 

 

30703 The published articles in SMJ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.