Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 106 - 123, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.71249/ssci.1558141

Abstract

References

  • Aldan Karademir, Ç. (2012). Classroom teachers' views on science and technology literacy. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(1).
  • Bostan, A. (2008). Different age group students' ideas about some basic concepts of astronomy (Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology).
  • Ercan, F., Taşdere, A., & Ercan, N. (2010). Observation of cognitive structure and conceptual change through word association test. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 7(2).
  • Galano, S., & Testa, I. (2025). Integrating practice-based activities and visual representations to foster students’ understanding of basic astronomy phenomena: An example about seasonal changes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
  • İnaltekin, T., & Akbaba, U. (2024). Investigation of middle school students' model of astronomy events and information sources of incorrect model. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 11(4), 508–524.
  • Kamaraj, E. (2009). The views of students and teachers on the association of elementary science and technology curriculum with daily life (Master’s thesis, Trakya University Institute of Social Sciences).
  • Kavak, N., Tufan, Y., & Demirelli, H. (2006). Science-technology literacy and informal science education: The potential role of newspapers. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 26(3), 17–28.
  • Kaya, V. (2017). Determining the relationship between information technology and student emotions and science literacy in the light of emotional intelligence. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(5).
  • Kaya, M., & Bacanak, A. (2013). The thoughts of science and technology candidates: The place of teacher in raising science literate individuals. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 21, 209–228.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method (15th ed.). Nobel Publication Distribution.
  • Köse, S., & Uşak, M. (2006). Determination of misconceptions in prospective science teachers: Photosynthesis and respiration in plants. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(1), 25–52.
  • Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Construction of science knowledge: Scaffolding conceptual change through discourse (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern British Columbia).
  • MONE. (2005). Primary science and technology curriculum and guide: 4th and 5th Grades (Draft Edition). Ankara: Directorate of State Books.
  • MONE. (2013). Primary school science curriculum. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publications.
  • Nobes, G., & Panagiotaki, G. (2008). Mental models and other misconceptions in children's understanding of the earth. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1–24.
  • Özcan, H., & Düzgünoğlu, H. (2017). Teachers' views on the 2017 draft science curriculum. International Journal of Active Learning, 2(2), 28–47.
  • Serttaş, S., & Yenilmez Türkoğlu, A. (2020). Diagnosing students' misconceptions of astronomy through concept cartoons. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 164–182.
  • T.D.K. (Turkish Language Association). (2005). Turkish Dictionary according to the spelling guide of the Turkish Language Institution. Ankara.
  • Ünsal, Y., Güneş, B., & Ergin, İ. (2001). A research on the determination of the knowledge levels of higher education students on basic astronomy subjects. Gazi University Journal of Education Faculty, 21(3).
  • Villarroel, J. D., & Villanueva, M. (2019). Observing and drawing the Sun: Research-based insights to assess children's perceptions. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4).
  • Yenca, C. (2016). 3-Acts: Using digital tools to give every student a voice. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (N.T.C.M.).

PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE on THE CONCEPT of "PLANET": A SURWEY STUDY

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 106 - 123, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.71249/ssci.1558141

Abstract

The aim of this study is to conduct a survey study on primary school students' knowledge about the concept of “planet”. The survey model was used in the study. The study was conducted in a primary school in a district with a low socioeconomic level in Istanbul. Within the scope of the study, a total of 1656 students were reached by conducting the application with 13 branches from each level. In the study, certain questions guided by the researcher were directed to the students to think and realize their drawings. They were given approximately 25-30 minutes for drawing. The drawings were evaluated using descriptive analysis method. Each drawing was analyzed separately. The concepts in the drawings were categorized as drawings related to the concepts in the solar system, drawings related to astronomy concepts, and drawings other than astronomy concepts. As a result of the coding, percentage frequency was determined according to the frequency of students' use of concepts at each level. In this context, it was determined that students in the first two levels made drawings and coding other than astronomy concepts, while students in the last two levels concentrated more on drawings and coding related to the concepts in the solar system and astronomy concepts.

References

  • Aldan Karademir, Ç. (2012). Classroom teachers' views on science and technology literacy. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(1).
  • Bostan, A. (2008). Different age group students' ideas about some basic concepts of astronomy (Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology).
  • Ercan, F., Taşdere, A., & Ercan, N. (2010). Observation of cognitive structure and conceptual change through word association test. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 7(2).
  • Galano, S., & Testa, I. (2025). Integrating practice-based activities and visual representations to foster students’ understanding of basic astronomy phenomena: An example about seasonal changes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
  • İnaltekin, T., & Akbaba, U. (2024). Investigation of middle school students' model of astronomy events and information sources of incorrect model. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 11(4), 508–524.
  • Kamaraj, E. (2009). The views of students and teachers on the association of elementary science and technology curriculum with daily life (Master’s thesis, Trakya University Institute of Social Sciences).
  • Kavak, N., Tufan, Y., & Demirelli, H. (2006). Science-technology literacy and informal science education: The potential role of newspapers. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 26(3), 17–28.
  • Kaya, V. (2017). Determining the relationship between information technology and student emotions and science literacy in the light of emotional intelligence. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(5).
  • Kaya, M., & Bacanak, A. (2013). The thoughts of science and technology candidates: The place of teacher in raising science literate individuals. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 21, 209–228.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method (15th ed.). Nobel Publication Distribution.
  • Köse, S., & Uşak, M. (2006). Determination of misconceptions in prospective science teachers: Photosynthesis and respiration in plants. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(1), 25–52.
  • Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Construction of science knowledge: Scaffolding conceptual change through discourse (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern British Columbia).
  • MONE. (2005). Primary science and technology curriculum and guide: 4th and 5th Grades (Draft Edition). Ankara: Directorate of State Books.
  • MONE. (2013). Primary school science curriculum. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publications.
  • Nobes, G., & Panagiotaki, G. (2008). Mental models and other misconceptions in children's understanding of the earth. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1–24.
  • Özcan, H., & Düzgünoğlu, H. (2017). Teachers' views on the 2017 draft science curriculum. International Journal of Active Learning, 2(2), 28–47.
  • Serttaş, S., & Yenilmez Türkoğlu, A. (2020). Diagnosing students' misconceptions of astronomy through concept cartoons. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 164–182.
  • T.D.K. (Turkish Language Association). (2005). Turkish Dictionary according to the spelling guide of the Turkish Language Institution. Ankara.
  • Ünsal, Y., Güneş, B., & Ergin, İ. (2001). A research on the determination of the knowledge levels of higher education students on basic astronomy subjects. Gazi University Journal of Education Faculty, 21(3).
  • Villarroel, J. D., & Villanueva, M. (2019). Observing and drawing the Sun: Research-based insights to assess children's perceptions. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4).
  • Yenca, C. (2016). 3-Acts: Using digital tools to give every student a voice. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (N.T.C.M.).
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Science Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Esra Kabataş Memiş 0000-0002-8272-0516

Merve Gülünce 0009-0009-3213-8753

Early Pub Date June 20, 2025
Publication Date June 30, 2025
Submission Date September 29, 2024
Acceptance Date May 28, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kabataş Memiş, E., & Gülünce, M. (2025). PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE on THE CONCEPT of "PLANET": A SURWEY STUDY. Social Scientific Centered Issues, 7(1), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.71249/ssci.1558141

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.


20077

Eurasian Scientific Journal Index

17629

Türk Eğitim İndeksi

17630

Asos Index

17631

Google Scholar