Determination of Genetic Diversity among Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populations Collected from Konya Region by SDS-PAGE
Yıl 2010,
Cilt: 2 Sayı: 35, 59 - 64, 01.12.2010
Elif Gülbahçe
,
Buğra Özkubat
Emine Arslan
Öz
This study aimed to determine the genetic diversity among 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populations collected from districts of Konya by SDS-PAGE. Seed storage protein profiles were scored visually as present (1) or absent (0). In all, 37 polypeptide bands of different sizes ranging from 14.4 to ~135 kDa were observed in the 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populations. Cluster analysis was performed using the UPGMA in Bio 1 D ++ computer program. Similarity among genotypes was estimated basing on Nei’s homology and a dendrogram was obtained. According to dendrogram, 17 populations belonging to Phaseolus vulgaris were similar in rates ranging from 68 to 100 %. While the highest similarity was found between Kanada (Çumra) and Sarnıç (Altınekin) genotypes, the most distant genotype was Sarhoş (Washington) (Derbent).
Kaynakça
- Babaoğlu, S., Açık, L., Çelebi, A., Adıgüzel, N. Molecular Analysıs Of Turkısh Alyssum L. (Brassıcaceae) Specıes By Rapd-Pcr And Sds-Page Methods. G.U. Journal of Science 17(3):25-33, (2004).
- Beyazbenli, Ş., Dural, H., Arslan, E., Ertuğrul, K. Konya Bölgesindeki bazı Vicia L. (Leguminosae) Türlerinin Tohum Protein Profillerinin SDS-PAGE Yöntemiyle İle Belirlenmesi. S.Ü. Fen Edebiyat Fak. Fen Dergisi, 28: 117-122, ( 2006).
- Chen L.F.O., Cheng M.C., Chen S.C.G. Similarity and diveristy of seed proteins in rice varieties. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 28: 169–183, (1987).
- Fujiwara, T., Nambarab E., Yamagishib K., Gotoc D. B., Naitoc , S. Storage Proteins. American Society of Plant Biologists, 1-12, (2002).
- Ghafoor, A, Ahmad, Z, Qureshi, A.S, Bashir, M. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica, 123:367-378, (2000).
- Ladizinsky G.W., Hymowitz T. Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 54: 680–685, (1979).
- Sözen, Ö. Artvin ili yerel fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populasyonlarının toplanması, tanımlanması ve morfolojik varyabilitesinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun, sayfa 1, (2006).
- Liang, X.Q., Luo, M., Holbrook, C.C., Guo, B.Z. Storage protein profiles in Spanish and runner market type peanuts and potential markers. BMC Plant Biology, 6:24, (2006).
- Singh S.P., Nodari R., Gepts P. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean I. allozymes. Crop Science, 31:19-23, (1991).
- 0] Yupsanis T.M., Moustakes M., Karakoli S. Seed protein electrophoresis for varietal identification in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 168:95–99, (1992).
- 1] Przybylska J., Zimniak-Przybylska Z., Krajewski P. Diversity of seed albumins in the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): an electrophoretic study, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45: 423–431, (1998).
- 2] Ertugrul, K., Arslan, E., Tugay, O. Characterization of Consolida S.F. Gray (Ranunculaceae) taxa in Turkey by seed storage protein electrophoresis. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 35(2);97-102, (2010).
- 3] Tamkoc, A., Arslan, E. Comparison of Agronomic Characters, Total Seed Storage Proteins and Their Use For Genotypes Discrimination in the Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(1):1573-1576, (2010).
- 4] Parisi, E., Agulari D., Methods Differentiating Meats of Different Species of Animals. “Biochemical İdentification of Meat Species” R.L.S. Patterson (Ed). Elselvier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 40-49, England, (1985)
- 5] Saraswati, R., Matoh, T., Phupaibul, P., Lumpkin, T.A., Kobayashi, M. Identification of Sesbania Species from Electrophoretic Patterns of Seed Protein, Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 70(3): 282-285, (1993).
- 6] Laemmli, U.K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the Assembly of bacteriophage T4., Nature, 277:680-684, (1970).
- 7] Nei, M. Estimation of average heterozygosities and genetic distances from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590, (1978) .
- 8] Sammour, R.H., Radwan, S.A., El-Koly, A. Genetic diversity in Phaseolus spp. as revealed by SDS-PAGE markers. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 151:69-75, (2007).
- 9] Martins, S.R., Vences, F.J., Saenz de Miera, L.E., Barrosa, M.R., Carnide, V. RAPD Analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Scientia Horticulturae, 108:133–142, (2006).
- 0] Svetleva, D., Pereira, G., Carlier, J., Cabrita, L., Leitão, J., Genchev, D. Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collecti on by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 198–206, (2006).
- 1] Papa, R., Gepts, P. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106:239–250, (2003).
- 2] Lioi, L., Piergiovanni A. R., Pignone, D., Puglisi, S., Santantonio, M., Gabriella S., Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding. 124(6):576 – 581, (2005).
- 3] Rosales-Serna, R., Herna´ndez-Delgado, S., Gonza´lez-Paz, M., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Mayek-Pe´rez, N. Genetic Relationships and Diversity Revealed by AFLP Markers in Mexican Common Bean Bred Cultivars, Crop Science, 45:1951-1957, (2005).
- 4] Sicard, D., Nanni, L., Porfiri, O., Bulfon, D., Papa, R. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124 :464-472, (2005).
Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi
Yıl 2010,
Cilt: 2 Sayı: 35, 59 - 64, 01.12.2010
Elif Gülbahçe
,
Buğra Özkubat
Emine Arslan
Öz
Bu çalışmada Konya’nın ilçelerinden toplanan 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populasyonu arasındaki genetik çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE ile belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tohum depo protein profilleri görsel şekilde var (1) ya da yok (0) olarak skorlanmıştır. On yedi Phaseolus vulgaris populasyonunda, 14.4 ve ~135 kDa arasında değişen farklı büyüklüklerde toplamda 37 polipeptit bant gözlenmiştir. Bio1D++ bilgisayar programında UPGMA kullanılarak kümeleme analizi yapılmıştır. Genotipler arasındaki benzerlik Nei’nin homolojisine dayanarak tahmin edilmiş ve bir dendrogram elde edilmiştir. Dendrograma göre Phaseolus vulgaris’e ait 17 populasyon %68-100 arasında değişen oranlarda benzer bulunmuştur. En yüksek benzerlik Kanada (Çumra) ve Sarnıç (Altınekin) genotipleri arasında bulunurken, en uzak genotip Sarhoş (Washington) (Derbent) olmuştur.
Kaynakça
- Babaoğlu, S., Açık, L., Çelebi, A., Adıgüzel, N. Molecular Analysıs Of Turkısh Alyssum L. (Brassıcaceae) Specıes By Rapd-Pcr And Sds-Page Methods. G.U. Journal of Science 17(3):25-33, (2004).
- Beyazbenli, Ş., Dural, H., Arslan, E., Ertuğrul, K. Konya Bölgesindeki bazı Vicia L. (Leguminosae) Türlerinin Tohum Protein Profillerinin SDS-PAGE Yöntemiyle İle Belirlenmesi. S.Ü. Fen Edebiyat Fak. Fen Dergisi, 28: 117-122, ( 2006).
- Chen L.F.O., Cheng M.C., Chen S.C.G. Similarity and diveristy of seed proteins in rice varieties. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 28: 169–183, (1987).
- Fujiwara, T., Nambarab E., Yamagishib K., Gotoc D. B., Naitoc , S. Storage Proteins. American Society of Plant Biologists, 1-12, (2002).
- Ghafoor, A, Ahmad, Z, Qureshi, A.S, Bashir, M. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica, 123:367-378, (2000).
- Ladizinsky G.W., Hymowitz T. Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 54: 680–685, (1979).
- Sözen, Ö. Artvin ili yerel fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populasyonlarının toplanması, tanımlanması ve morfolojik varyabilitesinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun, sayfa 1, (2006).
- Liang, X.Q., Luo, M., Holbrook, C.C., Guo, B.Z. Storage protein profiles in Spanish and runner market type peanuts and potential markers. BMC Plant Biology, 6:24, (2006).
- Singh S.P., Nodari R., Gepts P. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean I. allozymes. Crop Science, 31:19-23, (1991).
- 0] Yupsanis T.M., Moustakes M., Karakoli S. Seed protein electrophoresis for varietal identification in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 168:95–99, (1992).
- 1] Przybylska J., Zimniak-Przybylska Z., Krajewski P. Diversity of seed albumins in the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): an electrophoretic study, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45: 423–431, (1998).
- 2] Ertugrul, K., Arslan, E., Tugay, O. Characterization of Consolida S.F. Gray (Ranunculaceae) taxa in Turkey by seed storage protein electrophoresis. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 35(2);97-102, (2010).
- 3] Tamkoc, A., Arslan, E. Comparison of Agronomic Characters, Total Seed Storage Proteins and Their Use For Genotypes Discrimination in the Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(1):1573-1576, (2010).
- 4] Parisi, E., Agulari D., Methods Differentiating Meats of Different Species of Animals. “Biochemical İdentification of Meat Species” R.L.S. Patterson (Ed). Elselvier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 40-49, England, (1985)
- 5] Saraswati, R., Matoh, T., Phupaibul, P., Lumpkin, T.A., Kobayashi, M. Identification of Sesbania Species from Electrophoretic Patterns of Seed Protein, Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 70(3): 282-285, (1993).
- 6] Laemmli, U.K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the Assembly of bacteriophage T4., Nature, 277:680-684, (1970).
- 7] Nei, M. Estimation of average heterozygosities and genetic distances from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590, (1978) .
- 8] Sammour, R.H., Radwan, S.A., El-Koly, A. Genetic diversity in Phaseolus spp. as revealed by SDS-PAGE markers. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 151:69-75, (2007).
- 9] Martins, S.R., Vences, F.J., Saenz de Miera, L.E., Barrosa, M.R., Carnide, V. RAPD Analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Scientia Horticulturae, 108:133–142, (2006).
- 0] Svetleva, D., Pereira, G., Carlier, J., Cabrita, L., Leitão, J., Genchev, D. Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collecti on by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 198–206, (2006).
- 1] Papa, R., Gepts, P. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106:239–250, (2003).
- 2] Lioi, L., Piergiovanni A. R., Pignone, D., Puglisi, S., Santantonio, M., Gabriella S., Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding. 124(6):576 – 581, (2005).
- 3] Rosales-Serna, R., Herna´ndez-Delgado, S., Gonza´lez-Paz, M., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Mayek-Pe´rez, N. Genetic Relationships and Diversity Revealed by AFLP Markers in Mexican Common Bean Bred Cultivars, Crop Science, 45:1951-1957, (2005).
- 4] Sicard, D., Nanni, L., Porfiri, O., Bulfon, D., Papa, R. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124 :464-472, (2005).