Girişimcilik Temelli STEM Eğitiminin Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Öz düzenleme Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırma, girişimcilik temelli STEM eğitiminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin öz düzenleme becerileri üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 2019-2020 eğitim-öğretim yılında 8.sınıfta öğrenim görmekte olan 20 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada karma yöntem tercih edilmiştir ve tek gruplu ön test-son test modeli kullanılmıştır. Nicel verilerin elde edilmesinde “Algılanan Öz Düzenleme Becerileri Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Nitel verilerin elde edilmesinde ise açık uçlu “Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu” kullanılmıştır. Nicel verilerin ön ve son test puan ortalamalarının karşılaştırılmasında bağımlı örneklem t-testi analizi; nitel verilerin ön ve son test puan ortalamalarının karşılaştırılmasında ise içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 8 hafta süre ile öğrencilere girişimcilik temelli STEM eğitimi verilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin öz düzenleme becerilerinin ön ve son test puanları arasında anlamlı düzeyde bir farklılık oluşmamıştır ancak son test lehine artış gözlenmiştir. Öz düzenleme becerileri ile ilgili olan nitel verilerde ise öz yeterlilik kavramına ve öz düzenleme becerilerinin alt boyutları olan açık olma ve arayış alt boyutlarına ilişkin son test lehine gelişme görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ortaokul öğrencileri
• öz düzenleme
• STEM etkinlikleri

The Effect of Entrepreneurship-Based STEM Education on Secondary School Students’ Self-Regulation Skills

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the effect of entrepreneurship-based STEM education on secondary school students’ self-regulation skills. The sample of the study consisted of 20 students studying in the 8th grade in the 2019-2020 academic year. Mixed method was preferred and single group pre-test-post-test model was used in the study. “Perceived Self-Regulation Skills Scale” was used to obtain quantitative data. The open-ended “Semi-structured interview form” was used to obtain qualitative data. Pre-and post-test means of quantitative data were compared by paired-sample t test and content analysis method was used to compare the pre-and post-test means of qualitative data. Entrepreneurship-based STEM education was provided to the students for 8 weeks. As a result of the research, there was no significant difference between the pre-and post-test scores of the students’ self-regulation skills, however, there was an increase in favor of the post test. In the qualitative data related to self-regulation skills, an increase was also observed in favor of the post-test regarding the the concept of self-efficacy and the sub-dimensions of self-regulation skills, called “openness” and “seeking”.

Keywords

• Secondary school students
• self-regulation
• STEM activities

References

1. References Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.94
2. Akpınar, D. (2018). Üstün Yetenekli ve Zekâlı Öğrencilerde STEM Eğitiminin Öz düzenleme, Fen’ e Yönelik Motivasyonları ve Epistemolojik İnançlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi [Analyze of effect of stem education on self regulation, motivation towards science and epistomological belief in highly gifted and witted students] (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center.
3. Arseven, A. (2016). Öz Yeterlilik: Bir Kavram Analizi [ Self-Efficacy: A Concept Analysis]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(19), 63-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.10001
4. Arslan, S., & Gelisli, Y. (2015). Algılanan öz-düzenleme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of Perceived Self-Regulation Scale: Validity And Reliability Study]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.07146
5. Aydın, F., & Ulutas, İ. (2017). Okul öncesi çocuklarda öz düzenleme becerilerinin gelişimi [Preschool children’s growth of self-regulation]. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1 (2), 36-45. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ased/issue/39720/470461
6. Aydın, N. (2019). STEM ve STEM temelli robotik etkinliklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin problem çözmeye yönelik yansıtıcı düşünme, zihinsel risk alma ve öğrenmede motive edici stratejilerine etkisi [The effect of STEM and STEM-based robotic activities on secondary school students’ problem solving reflective thinking, mental risk taking and motivative strategies in learning] (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center.
7. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
8. Bandura, A. (2010). Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836

9. Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Mesutoğlu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program”, International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338
10. Barron, A. B., Hebets, E. A., Cleland, T. A., Fitzpatrick, C. L., Hauber, M. E., & Stevens, J.R.(2015).Embracing multiple definitions of learning. Trends in neurosciences, 38(7), 405-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.008
11. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological inquiry, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1
12. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199- 210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006 9013-4.
13. Boekaerts, M., Maes, S., & Karoly, P. (2005). Self‐regulation across domains of applied psychology: Is there an emerging consensus?. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00201.x
14. Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research (No. 1). Cambridge University Press.
15. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(3), 245-281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
16. Caldwell, L., Garcia, R., & Cagle, N. (2018). K-12 diversity pathway programs in the E-STEM fields: A review of existing programs and summary of unmet needs. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 19(4).
17. Caruth, G. D. (2013). Demystifying mixed methods research design: A review of the literature. Online Submission, 3(2), 112-122. DOI: 10.13054/mije.13.35.3.2
18. Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263. https://doi.org /10.12691/education-3-8-10
19. Cohen, M. (2012). The importance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892-902.
20. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
21. Çakır, Z.(2018). Montessori yaklaşım temelli STEM etkinliklerinin okul öncesi öğretmen adayları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effects of montessori approach based STEM effectiveness on pre-school teacher candidates ](Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center.
22. de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L. S., Ugarte, M. D., Iriarte, M. D., & de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S. (2003). Immediate and long-term effects of a cognitive intervention on intelligence, self-regulation, and academic achievement. European journal of psychology of education, 18(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173604
23. Deveci, İ., Zengin, M. N.,& Cepni, S. (2015). Fen Tabanlı Girişimcilik Eğitimi Modüllerinin Geliştirilmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi [Development and Evaluation of Science-Based Enterprising Training Module]. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 14(27).
24. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
25. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20 (2), 159-165. http://iospress.metapress.com/content/7x9hgpq885t2yttq/
26. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
27. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
28. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
29. Fuhs, M. W., Farran, D. C., & Nesbitt, K. T. (2013). Preschool classroom processes as predictors of children’s cognitive self-regulation skills development. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000031
30. Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington, DC. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
31. Graham, S., & R. Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
32. Hall, J. N. (2013). Pragmatism, evidence, and mixed methods evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013 (138), 15-26. DOI: 10.1002/ev.20054
33. Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2007). Temporal self-regulation theory: A model for individual health behavior. Health Psychology Review, 1(1), 6-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3
34. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
35. Jouhari, Z., Haghani, F., & Changiz, T. (2015). Factors affecting self-regulated learning in medical students: a qualitative study. Medical education online, 20(1), 28694. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.28694
36. Karakaya, F., & Avgin, S. S. (2016). Effect of demographic features to middle school students’ attitude towards FeTeMM (STEM). Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 4188- 4198.
37. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of educational computing research, 30(1-2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.2190/AX2D-Y9VM-V7PX-0TAD
38. Kaya, M.E. (2018). STEM Uygulamalarının Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adayları Öz Düzenleme ve Yaratıcılığına Etkisi [The Impact on the Creativity and Self-educational Skills of Student Education Teacher Candidates] (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center.
39. Klassen, A. C., Creswell, J., Clark, V. L. P., Smith, K. C., & Meissner, H. I. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 377-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x
40. LaRose, R., Lin, C. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?. Media Psychology, 5(3), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_01
41. Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., Brannagan, K. B., & Tanaka, H. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809345262
42. León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017
43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). The only generalization is: There is no generalization. Case study method, 27-44.
44. Lowrie, T., Leonard, S., & Fitzgerald, R. (2018). STEM Practices: A translational framework for large-scale STEM education design. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 2(1).
45. Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 101(3), 689. https:// https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014240
46. Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review, 62(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
47. Mee, R. W., & Chua, T. C. (1991). Regression toward the mean and the paired sample t test. The American Statistician, 45(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1991.10475763
48. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
49. Morse, J. M. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 339-353.
50. Morse, J. M., & Cheek, J. (2015). Introducing qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs. Researrch Methods & Evaluationt, 25 (6), 731-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315583299
51. Nartgün, Ş., & Kaya, A.(2016). Creating school image in accordance with private school parents’ expectations. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5 (2), 154-167.
52. Özkızılcık, M., & Cebesoy, Ü. B. (2020). Tasarım Temelli FeTeMM Etkinliklerinin Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Problem Çözme Becerilerine ve FeTeMM Öğretimi Yönelimlerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi [The Effectiveness of Design Based STEM activities on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Problem Solving Skills and STEM Teaching Intentions]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.588222
53. Öztürk, S.C.(2018). STEM eğitiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme ve eleştirel düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi [The effects of STEM education on the problem solving and critical thinking skills of science teachers] (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 55-128). Springer, Dordrecht.
54. Rae, D., & Melton, D. E. (2017). Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineering education: an international view of the KEEN Project. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 7(3).
55. Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of advanced academics, 22(2), 194-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202
56. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
57. Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2004). Experimental research methods. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2, 1021-43.
58. SA, N. H., Arifi, A., Putranta, H., & Azizah, A. N. M. (2021). Experiences of participants in teacher professional education on obtaining soft skills: A Case Study in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 313-325. DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.313
59. Sanders, M. R., & Mazzucchelli, T. G. (2013). The promotion of self-regulation through parenting interventions. Clinical child and family psychology review, 16(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-013-0129-z
60. Singh, P., Teoh, S. H., Cheong, T. H., Rasid, N. S. M., Kor, L. K., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2018). The use of problem-solving heuristics approach in enhancing stem students development of mathematical thinking. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3921
61. Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self‐regulation. British journal of health psychology, 14(2), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X389042
62. Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. J. (2000). The Interdisciplinary Curriculum: A Literary Review and a Manual for Administrators and Teachers.
63. Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings.
64. Şencan, H. (2005). Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik [ Reliability and validity]. Hüner Şencan.
65. Taşpınar, M. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde SSPS Uygulamalı Nicel Veri Analizi [ SPSS Applied Quantitative Data Analysis in Social Sciences]. (1. Baskı), Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
66. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and applications, 5, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158.
67. Topsakal, İ.(2018). Probleme dayalı stem eğitiminin öğrencilerin öğrenme iklimlerine eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerine ve problem çözme becerilerine ilişkin algılarına etkisinin araştırılması [The research of the system educati̇on on the students learning environment, critical thinking disposition and problem solving abilities perception] (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK National Thesis Center.
68. Tortop, H. S., & Eker, C. (2014). Why should self-regulated learning skills take place in gifted education programs. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(1), 23-41.
69. Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: Görüşme [A qualitative research technique that can be used effectively in pedagogical research: Interview]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(4), 543-559. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10372/126941
70. Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., and Capa-Aydin, Y. (2013). Predicting critical thinking skills of university students through metacognitive self-regulation skills and chemistry self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 666-670.
71. Üredi, I., & Erden, M. (2009). Öz-Düzenleme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel İnançlarının Yordayıcısı Olarak Algılanan Anne Baba Tutumları [Perceived Parenting Styles as Predictor of Students’ Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Motivational Beliefs]. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(4). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26109/275081
72. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 21-54. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
73. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Understanding self-regulation. Handbook of self-regulation, 19.
74. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self- regulatory perspective. Educational psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86.
75. Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self‐monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self‐regulation. New directions for teaching and learning, 1995(63), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956305