Academic Literacy Skills of Postgraduate Students in the Department of Turkish Education

Abstract

This study aims to identify the academic literacy skills of postgraduate students specializing in the department of Turkish education. This study employed a convergent parallel mixed method, one of the mixed methods. The first working group consisted of 161 students for the quantitative dimension and 25 students in the second group for the qualitative dimension. The study deployed the Academic Literacy Scale and a semi-structured interview form as data collection tools. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used during quantitative data analysis, while content analysis was used for qualitative data. The quantitative findings revealed that the mean academic literacy level score of postgraduate students in the Department of Turkish Education was 4.07, indicating an agreement level; the student's academic literacy level significantly differed across the level of postgraduate education in favor of those pursuing the doctoral degree; no significant difference was observed across postgraduate education stage and gender. The qualitative findings suggested that postgraduate students in the Department of Turkish Education predominantly utilized scientific research processes to identify problem situations, had a moderate level of knowledge regarding scientific research processes, and exhibited awareness of the need to act honestly and responsibly in scientific research and to obtain the necessary permissions. Additionally, they read academic sources to gain information about a subject and to review the literature, even though they needed help reading academic sources in languages other than Turkish. Besides, academic sources were found to provide adequate information. Moreover, they were determined to write academic texts according to a certain writing plan and felt inadequate in writing academic texts. Notably, the education they received in Turkish education improved their academic literacy skills.

Keywords

• Academic literacy
• postgraduate education
• Turkish education

References

1. Altun Alkan, H. (2021). Bilimsel yazma becerilerini geliştirme izlemleri [Follow-ups to improve scientific writing skills]. In G. Çetinkaya, Ö. Yolcusoy & H. Altun Alkan (Eds.), Akademik yazma [Academic writing] (pp. 67-86). Anı Yayıncılık.
2. Aslan, C. (2010). Türkçe eğitimi programlarında lisansüstü öğrenim gören öğrencilerin akademik özyeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri [The opinions of the Turkish education postgraduate students about their academic self-efficacy]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 19, 87-115. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeuefd/issue/19391/205944
3. Ayyıldız Çolak, A. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of teacher candidates' academic literacy levels and critical thinking tendencies]. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 8(31), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.54776.
4. Bağcı Ayrancı, B., & Süğümlü, Ü. (2021). Dijital okuma [Digital reading]. In F. S. Kırmızı (Ed.), Dijital dönüşümde Türkçe öğretimi [Teaching Turkish in digital transformation] (pp. 161-175). Anı Yayıncılık.
5. Boyacı, S., & Demirkol, S. (2018). Türkçe eğitimi alanında yapılan doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi [An examination of doctoral dissertations in the field of teaching Turkish]. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 6(2), 512-531. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.363599
6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Nitel araştırmacılar için 30 temel beceri [30 essential skills for qualitative researchers] (H. Özcan, Tr.). Anı Yayıncılık.
8. Demir, S., & Deniz, H. (2020). Akademik okuryazarlık ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Developing an academic literacy scale: assesing validity and reliability]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1366-1379. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.4008

9. Elkıran, Y. M. (2021). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile teknoloji yeterliği öz-değerlendirmeleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between prospective Turkish teachers academic literacy and technology proficiency self-assessments]. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.975296
10. Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.004
11. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2014). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analysing and understanding data. Pearson.
12. Güçlü, İ. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri teknik-yaklaşım-uygulama [Qualitative research methods in social sciences technique-approach-application]. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
13. Holschuh, J. P. (2019). College Reading and Studying: The Complexity of Academic Literacy Task Demands. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(6), 599-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.876
14. Işık, P., & Kana, F. (2023). Lisans ve lisansüstü öğrencilerin akademik okuryazarlık durumları [Academic literacy of undergraduate and graduate students]. In F. Kana (Ed.), Türkçe öğretiminde güncel araştırmalar [Current research in Turkish teaching] (pp. 99-120). Holistence Publications.
15. İbili, H., & Özbaş, M. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation into the relationship between academic literacy levels and communication skills of pre-service teachers]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 12(2), 364-376. https://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.1199899
16. İşcan, A., Sevim, O., & Varışoğlu, B. (2012). Türkçe eğitimi alanında öğrenim gören lisansüstü öğrencilerinin bilgi okuryazarlığı düzeyleri [Information literacy levels of graduate students studying at the department of Turkish education]. Ordu University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(6), 205-215. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/odusobiad/issue/27570/290103
17. Kan, M. O., & Gedik, F. N. (2016) Türkçe Eğitimi alanında yüksek lisans tezi tamamlayanların akademik yazma ve tez oluşturma sürecine ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of students completing master thesis in Turkish education field about academic writing and thesis formation process]. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(3), 402-408. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/61491/918166
18. Kurudayıoğlu, M. (2014). Dünyada ve Türkiye’ de dil bilgisi öğretiminde temel problemleri [Basic problems in grammar teaching in the world and in Turkiye]. In M. Özbay (Ed.), Türkçe eğitimi açısından dil bilgisi öğretimi [Grammar teaching in terms of Turkish education] (pp. 47-70). Pegem Akademi.
19. Maxwell, J. A. (2022). Nitel araştırma tasarımı etkileşimli bir yaklaşım [An interactive approach to qualitative research design] (3rd Ed.) (Ed. M. Çevikbaş, Tr.). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
20. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024852
21. Önal, A., & Maden, S. (2021). Türkçe eğitimi ile ilgili 2015-2019 yılları arası lisansüstü tezlerin araştırma eğilimleri [Research tendencies of postgraduate theses between 2015-2019 on turkish education]. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(3), 929-941. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.879623
22. Sulak, S. E., & Süğümlü, Ü. (2020). Türkçe öğretiminde strateji, yöntem ve teknikler [Strategies, methods and techniques in Turkish teaching]. In H. Akyol & A. Şahin (Eds.). Türkçe öğretimi [Teaching Turkish] (2nd Ed.) (pp. 333-366). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
23. Şentürk, C., & Yazar, İ. (2021). Türkçe öğretimi üzerine yapılan lisansüstü çalışmaların analizi [Postgraduate studies analysis on Turkish teaching]. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 10(4), 258-276. Retrieved from http://www.ijtase.net/index.php/ijtase/article/view/4/6
24. Şentürk, R. (2021). Bilimsel metnin bölümleri [Parts of the scientific text]. In G. Çetinkaya, Ö. Yolcusoy & H. Altun Alkan (Eds.), Akademik yazma [Academic Writing] (pp. 23-65). Anı Yayıncılık.
25. Tunagür, M. (2021). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of academic literacy levels of turkish teacher candidates]. EKEV Academy Journal, 25(87), 435-450. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sosekev/issue/71551/1151390
26. Türkben, T., & Satılmış, S. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık, dijital okuryazarlık ve eleştirel okuryazarlık becerilerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers' academic literacy, digital literacy and critical literacy skills in terms of various variables]. Türkiye Education Journal, 7(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.54979/turkegitimdergisi.1159184
27. Yancey, K. B. (2009). The literacy demands of entering the university. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 256–270). Guilford.
28. Yücelşen, N., & Çetinkaya Edizer, Z. (2020). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının akademik yazma becerilerine ilişkin görüşleri [The Views of Turkish Teacher Candidates on Academic Writing Skills]. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 8(4), 1165-1182. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.774465