-

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt Emotional Reactivity Scale developed by Mathew and his friends (2008) to the Turkish. Emotional reactivity has been described as an important factor in interpersonal relations, and in individual's psychological alignment. For this reason, adaptation of "Emotional Reactivity Scale" to the Turkish is considered important. This research is the work of a scale adaptation. Study group of the research consists of 290 male and 275 female with a total of 565 undergraduate students studying in Erzurum Ataturk University, in the academic year 2012-2013. Since the research is a scale adaptation work, it is translated into English, which is primarily dominated by * Arş. Gör. Atatürk Üni., K.K.Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D,[e-mail]** Öğr. Gör. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D, [e-mail]*** Doç. Dr. Atatürk Üniversitesi, K.K.Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D, [e-mail] academics has been adapted into Turkish, and has been translated into English again by a different scholar. After establishing language, the validity of the scale and reliability of the analysis are examined. In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and KMO .871, Bartlett test χ2 value of 864.937 (p <.001) are found. In addition, threefactor structure was obtained that describes the 49.772 % of the total variance. Item-factor structure obtained from the EFA has been tested for compliance with a model by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Based on this, three-factor structure of the Emotional Reactivity Scale has been validated. (X2 = 179.29, df = 127, p = .00, X2 / df = 1.41). When looked at fit indices of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) RMSEA=.066, RMR= .012, NFI=.90, CFI=.94, IFI=.94, RFI=.91, AGFI=.90, GFI=.90 are found. The coefficient of the total internal consistency is found .91, sensitivity subscale is .86, emotional reactivity subscale is .76 and psychological durability subscale is found.81 in the scale which is made to determine reliability of the scale and it is found that scale has internal consistency. As a result of the EFA and CFA applied for adaptation of Emotional Reactivity scale to the Turkish, it can be said that the scale is a reliable and valid measurement tool. It is suggested that studies on reliability and validity of Emotional reactivity scale on adolescents can be made in future researches

Keywords

• Emotional reactivity, reliability, validity

Emotional Reactivity Scale Adaptation to Turkish Culture: Reliability and Validity Study

Öz

The purpose of this study is to adapt Emotional Reactivity Scale developed by Mathew and his friends (2008) to the Turkish culture. Emotional reactivity has been described as an important factor in interpersonal relations, and in individual's psychological alignment. For this reason, adaptation of "Emotional Reactivity Scale" to the Turkish culture is considered important. This research is the work of a scale adaptation. Study group of the research consists of 290 male and 275 female with a total of  565 undergraduate students studying in Erzurum Ataturk University, in the academic year 2012-2013. Since the research is a scale adaptation work, it is translated into English, which is primarily dominated by two academics has been adapted into Turkish, and has been translated into English again by a different scholar. After establishing language, the validity of the scale and reliability of the analysis are examined. In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and KMO .871, Bartlett test χ2 value of 864.937 (p <.001) are found. In addition, three-factor structure was obtained that describes the 49.772 % of the total variance. Item-factor structure obtained from the EFA has been tested for compliance with a model by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Based on this, three-factor structure of the Emotional Reactivity Scale has been validated. (X2 = 179.29, df = 127, p = .00, X2 / df = 1.41). When looked at fit indices of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) RMSEA=.066, RMR= .012, NFI=.90, CFI=.94, IFI=.94, RFI=.91, AGFI=.90, GFI=.90 are found. The coefficient of the total internal consistency is found .91, sensitivity subscale is .86, emotional reactivity subscale is .76 and psychological durability subscale is found.81 in the scale which is made to determine reliability of the scale and it is found that scale has internal consistency. As a result of the EFA and CFA applied for adaptation of Emotional Reactivity scale to the Turkish culture, it can be said that the scale is a reliable and valid measurement tool. It is suggested that studies on reliability and validity of Emotional reactivity scale on adolescents can be made in future researches

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emotional reactivity, reliability, validity

References

1. Akbulut, Y.(2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal & Kültür Yayıncılık
2. Beck, A. T.,Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J.,&Erbaugh, J. (1961). An ınventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571
3. Brown, M.W.(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, KA.; Long, JS., (Ed). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık.
5. Byrne, B., Campbell, L.(1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30, 555-574.
6. Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2003). Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 33, 395–405.
7. Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
8. Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. D. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: a clinical perspective . In N. A. Fox (Ed.), The Development of emotion regulation: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

9. Conklin, C. Z., Bradley, R., & Westen, D. (2006). Affect regulation in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 69–7
10. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli SPSS ve LİSREL uygulamaları. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık
11. Davidson, R. J., Lewis, D. A., Alloy, L. B., Amaral, D. G., Bush, G., Cohen, J. D. (2002). Neural and behavioral substrates of mood and mood regulation. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 478–502.
12. Engeler, A., Yargıç, L. (2007). Kişiler arası tepkisellik indeksi: Empatinin çok boyutlu ölçümü. New Symposium Journal, 45(3), 119-127
13. Field, A.(2005). Discovering statistic using SPSS for Windows. London: SAGE Publications.
14. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362
15. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6,1−55-65.
16. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
17. Kaya, A. ve Siyez, D.M (2010). KA-Sİ çocuk ve ergenler için empatik eğilim ölçeği: Geliştirilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Education and Science, 35(156), 110-125
18. Levine, D., Elsa, M., & Hood, J. (1997). Emotion processing in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185, 240–246.
19. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: The Guilford Press.
20. Martin, C.R., & Newell, R.J. (2004). Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology Health and Medicine, 3,327-336.
21. Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1281–1310.
22. Moscicki, E. K. (1999). Epidemiology of suicide. In D. G. Jacobs (Ed.), The Harvard Medical School guide to suicide assessment and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
23. Pallant, J.(2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
24. Schriesheim, C.A., & Eisenbach, R.J. (1995). An exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic ınvestigation of item wording effects on obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. Journal of Management, 6 , 1177-1193.
25. Shevlin, M.E., & Lewis, C.A. (1999). The revised social anxiety scale: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2 , 250-252.
26. Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2003). Adolescents’ emotion regulation in daily life: Links to depressive symptoms and problem behavior. Child Development, 74, 1869–1880.
27. Southam-Gerow, M. A., & Kendall, P. C. (2002). Emotion regulation and understanding: Implications for child psychopathology and therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 189–222.
28. Suveg, C., & Zeman, J. (2004). Emotion regulation in children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 750–759.
29. Safer, D. L., Telch, C. F., & Agras, W. S. (2001). Dialectical behavior therapy adapted for bulimia: A case report. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 101–106.
30. Safer, D. L., Telch, C. F., & Agras, W. S. (2001). Dialectical behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry , 158, 632–634.
31. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal esitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulama. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt 3, Sayı 6, 49Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32. Şimşek, Ö.F.(2007) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş; Temel İlkeler ve LİSREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık. Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
33. Ural, A., Kılıç, İ. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
34. Yen, S., Zlotnick, C.,&Costello, E. (2002). Affect regulation in women with borderline personality disorder traits. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 693–696. ERSDUYGUSAL TEPKİSELLİK ÖLÇEĞİ T am am en k at ıl ıy or u m K at ıl ıy or u m K at ıl m ıy or um H iç k at ıl m ıy or um
35. Üzücü olaylar karşısında çok kolayca duygusallaşırım Çok küçük şeyler bile beni duygusallaştırır. Bir duyguyu yaşadığımda çok yoğun yaşarım. Üzücü bir şey yaşadığımda, uzun bir süre ona kafa yorarım Duygularımı çok yoğun yaşarım. Duygularımda ani iniş-çıkışlar yaşadığım olur. Bir duyguyu yaşadığımda başka bir duyguyu yaşamak benim için çok zordur. Benim için mantıklı/ düzgün düşünmek zordur, bu yüzden kendimi genellikle mutsuz hissederim. Duygusal olarak çok çabuk incinirim. Kızgın olduğumda çevremdekiler beni zor sakinleştirir. Kendimi genellikle endişeli hissederim. Diğer insanların önemsemediği şeylere çok kafa yorarım. Üzücü bir durum karşısında kolayca dağılırım. Çevremdekiler olaylara aşırı tepki verdiğimi söyler. Kötü bir olay yaşadığımda, ruh halim hızlıca değişir. Çevremdekiler olaylar karşısında sakinliğimi koruyamadığımı söyler. Eğer biriyle bir anlaşmazlık yaşarsam, bu durumu kafamdan atmam zaman alır.