Exploring ELT Students’ Perception of Mobile Phone through Figurative Language

Year 2016, , 9 - 25, 12.07.2016

Müfit Şenel

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.92706

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate, analyze and evaluate the mobile phone perceptions of ELT students by the help of figurative language. The participants of this study are Grade 3 and Grade 4 students of ELT Department at Samsun 19 Mayıs University, Faculty of Education, involving 139 students in total. In this research students were asked to use “simile” as a figurative language and complete the sentence “Mobile phone is as ……as…….”  in the target language.  According to content analysis, the results showed that only 119 of 139 students produced valid sentences, completing sentences considering their social environments and their daily lives. According to the classification of the sentences depending upon the responses of the students, five conceptual categories were identified. At the end of the study, students were found to have both positive and negative concepts about mobile phones; for instance25.2% developed figurative language for ‘part of life’, 18.5% for ‘addiction’, 17.6% for ‘entertainment’, 31.1% for ‘useful device’ and 7.6% for ‘dangerous factor’ categories. Implications are given and suggestions made for language teachers at the end. Most of these results indicate that students’ preferences change depending upon whether they benefit from the use of mobile phones.

Keywords

ELT, simile, figurative language, mobile phone perception.

through Figurative Language

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı İngiliz Dili Eğitimi lisans öğrencilerinin cep telefonlarına ilişkin algılarını incelemektir. Çalışmanın katılımcı grubunu Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı’nda eğitim gören 3. ve 4. sınıflardan toplam 139 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında katılımcılardan “benzetme” söz sanatını kullanarak “Cep telefonu ……….. gibidir” cümlesini hedef dilde tamamlamaları istenmiştir. Yapılan içerik analizinin sonuçlarına göre 139 öğrenciden 119’u çalışma için geçerli veri üretmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular öğrencilerin cep telefonu algılarına ilişkin hem olumlu hem de olumsuz görüşler ortaya koyduğunu göstermektedir; örneğin, %25.2’si cep telefonunu ‘hayatın parçası’, %18.5’i ‘bağımlılık’, %17.6’sı ‘eğlence’, %31.1’i ‘faydalı bir gereç’ ve %7.6’sı ‘tehlikeli bir etken’ olarak değerlendirmiştir. Çalışmanın son kısmında elde edilen bulguların pratik yansımaları ve İngilizce öğretmenleri için bazı öneriler sunulmuştur

Keywords

İngiliz dili eğitimi, benzetme, söz sanatları, cep telefonu algısı

References

• Abidin, M. J. Z., Pour-Mohammadi, M., & Alzwari, H. (2012). EFL students' attitudes towards learning English language: The case of Libyan secondary school students. Asian social science, 8(2), 119-134.
• Ağca, R. K. & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781-785.
• Ally, M. (Eds). (2009). Mobile learning: transforming the delivery of education and training. Canada: AU Press.
• Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: a technology update and m-learning project summary. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. http://www.mlearning.org/ docs/The%20mlearning%20project%20%20technology%20update%20and%20project%20summary.pdf (Accessed on Nov.2014).
• Azar, A. S., & Nasiri, H. (2014). Learners’ Attitudes toward the effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in L2 listening comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1836-1843.
• Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on grammatical accuracy of EFL students. Mextesol, 34(2), 1-10.
• Başoğlu, E.B. & Akdemir, Ö. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flashcards. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7.
• Batista, S. C. F., & Barcelos, G. T. (2014). Considerations on the use of mobile phones in educational context. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(1), 1-10.
• Boers, F. (2000a). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 137–147.
• Bredin, H. (1998). Comparisons and similes. Lingua, 105, 67-68.
• Campbell, S. W. (2006). Perceptions of mobile phones in college classrooms: Ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 55, 280-294.
• Caplan, S.E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721-736.
• Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan A., & Gürcan, A. (2007). Validity and reliability studies of problematic internet usage scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 387-416.
• Coşkun, M. (2010). Lise öğrencilerinin “iklim” kavramıyla ilgili metaforları (zihinsel imgeleri). Turkish Studies, 5(3), 919-940.
• Chang, C., Liang, C., Yan, C., & Tseng, J. (2013). The impact of college students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on continuance intention to use English mobile learning systems. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 22(2), 181-192.
• Chen, J. & Kinshuk, J. (2005). Mobile technology in educational services. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 14(1), 91–109.
• Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M. & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59, 1054–1064.
• Choliz, M. (2010). Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction, 105(2), 373-374. Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.x/full(Accessed on Sept.2014).
• Commonwealth of Learning (2008). Using of mobile technology for learner support in open schooling. www.paddle.usp.ac.fj/collect/paddle/index/assoc/col008.dir/doc.pdf (Accessed on 9 April 2014).
• Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 51–58.
• Çelikten, M. (2006). Kültür ve öğretmen metaforları. Kayseri Erciyes Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 21(2), 269-283.
• Daily Mail (2014). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2739380/Students-addicted-mobile-phones-some-spending-ten-hours-day-texting-emailing-social (Accessed on February 2015).
• De la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners’ attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: the role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261-276.
• Demouy, V., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language program. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217-232.
• Deniz, L., & Tutgun, A. (2010). The relationship between problematic internet usage and loneliness level of prospective teachers. In International Educational Technology Conference (IETC) (Vol. 3, p. 1563), Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
• Dudeney, G. and Hockly, N. (2012). ‘ICT in ELT: how did we get here and where are we going?’ ELT Journal 66(4), 533–542.
• Ellis, N. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24.
• Eraslan, L. (2011). Sosyolojik metaforlar. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 24, 1-22.
• Erikson, E. (1998). Life cycle completed: Extended Version. New York: WW Norton & Company.
• Fromilhague, C. (1995). Les figures de style. Paris: Nathan.
• Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö, Karadeniz, Ş., & Dalgıç, G. (2011). Eğitim yöneticileri teknoloji liderliği öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 17(2), 145-166.
• Hockly, N. (2013). Mobile learning, ELT Journal, 67(1), 80-84.
• Hockly, N. (2013). Going mobile. Modern English Teacher, 22(1), 42-44.
• Hussain, R. (2014). Metaphors and similes in literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(9), 01-02.
• Hsu, C. (2015). Learning motivation and adaptive video caption filtering for EFL learners using handheld devices. ReCALL, 27, 84-103.
• İnal, S., Evin, İ., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2005). The relation between students’ attitudes toward foreign language and foreign language achievement. Dil Dergisi, 130, 37-52.
• Kalinicet, Z., Arsovski, S., Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, Z., & Rankovic, V. (2011). The development of a mobile learning application as support for a blended e-learning environment. Technics Technologies Education Management, 6, 4, 1345–1355.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? European Journal for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 157-165.
• Kövecses, Z. (2001). A cognitive linguistic view of learning idioms in an FLT context. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.). Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 87–115). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Lakoff, G. ve Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar: Hayat, anlam ve dil (Çev: G. Y. Demir). Paradigma Yay: İstanbul.
• Lan, Y-F., and Sie, Y-S, (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computer & Education, 55, 723-732.
• Leonard, T. (2010). With new evidence on the dangers of mobile phones, we examine the worrying risks you’re not being told about. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1318040/Mobile-phones-Brain-cancer-risk-youre-told-about. (Accessed on February 2015).
• Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J.E. & Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2014) Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210-219.
• Liaw, S. S., Chen, G. D., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3), 950-961.
• Ling, R.S. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
• Lin, C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48-59.
• Litchfield, A., Dyson, L. E., Lawrence, E., & Zmijewska, A. (2007). Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning. Proceedings of the ASCILITE-ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, 587-596. Retrieved on 22 May 2015 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences /singapore07/procs/litchfield.pdf.
• Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Literary Devices (2014). http://literarydevices.net/simile/
• Liu, P. & Chen, C. (2014). Learning English through actions: a study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 1-14.
• McNeal, T., & van't Hooft, M. (2006). Anywhere, anytime: Using mobile phones for learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology ,2(2), 24-31.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
• Moeller, B. & Tim Reitzes (2011) Education development center, Inc. (EDC). Integrating technology with student-centered learning. Quincy, MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation.
• Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: a framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581–596.
• Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.
• Noyes, A. (2004). Producing mathematics teachers: A sociological perspective. Teaching Education, 15 (3), 243-256.
• NY Daily News (2014) http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/addicted-phones-84-worldwide-could-single-day-mobile-device-hand-article-1.1137811 (Accessed on October 2014).
• Odabaşı, H. (2009). Mobile learning and the mobile library. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Information Age of Being: Opportunities and Threats. Yeditepe University, Istanbul. 1-2 October.
• O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Leaning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Osman, M. A., Talib, A. Z., Sanusi, Z. A., Shiang-Yen, T., & Alwi, A. S. (2012). A Study of the Trend of Smartphone and its Usage Behavior in Malaysia. International Journal of New Computer Architectures and their Applications (IJNCAA), 2(1), 274-285.
• Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W. & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.
• Rahimi, M., & Miri, S. S. (2014). The impact of mobile dictionary use on language learning. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1469-1474.
• Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22.
• Read, write and think (2008). http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/lessondocs/Literal FigurativeHandout.pdf
• Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 55, 459-496.
• Saban, A. (2008a). İlköğretim I. Kademe öğretmen ve öğrencilerinin bilgi kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. İlköğretim Online, 7(2), 421-455.
• Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 281-326.
• Senneth, R. (1980). Authority. New York, N.Y: Vintage Books
• Tajalli, G. (2000). Idioms and metaphorical expressions in translation. Tehran: Samt Pub.
• Tutgun, A. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Problemli İnternet Kullanımı. Marmara Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi (MA), İstanbul.
• Tutgun, A., & Deniz, L. (2010). Problematic internet usage among prospective teachers. In International Educational Technology Conference (IETC) (Vol. 2, p. 1226).
• Tutgun, A, Deniz, L. & Moon, Man-Ki (2011). A comparative study of problematic internet use and loneliness among Turkish and Korean prospective teachers, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 10(4), 14.
• Unesco, (2014). http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/resources/online-materials/single-view/news/ unesco_study_shows_effectiveness_of_mobile_phones_in_promoting_reading_and_literacy_in_developing_countries/#.VU0TMsscSUk
• Utulu, C. S, (2012). Use of mobile phones for project based learning by undergraduate students of Nigerian private Universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information Communication and Technology, 8(1), 1 – 15.
• Uzunboylu, H. & Özdamlı, F. (2011). Teacher perception for m-learning: scale development and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 544–556
• Özünlü, Ü. (2001). Edebiyatta dil kullanımları. İstanbul: Multilingual.
• Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117-134.
• Yıldırım A. & Şimşek H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (5.Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.