Examination of Water Literacy Levels Secondary School Students in Terms of Different Variables

Year 2023, , 194 - 208, 30.06.2023

Sadettin Erbaş , Gökçe Kılıçoğlu , Bülent Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1244043

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the water literacy levels of secondary school students in Turkey in terms of different factories. The research is designed within the survey model. The sampling of the research consists of 408 secondary school students enrolled in schools in Turkish cities of Istanbul, Ankara, Trabzon, Kutahya, and Yozgat. Data is collected via 3 sub-dimensional water literacy scale developed by Sözcü and Türker, (2020a) as well as personal information sheet developed to determine water literacy levels of secondary school students. As a result of the research, when the scores of the secondary school students from the sub-dimensions of the water literacy scale were evaluated, it was found that the gender variable did not make a significant difference on the water literacy, but there was a significant difference in terms of the class level variable, advantaging class 5 and 6. There was a significant difference in the parent education variable, disadvantaging illiterate parents. Likewise, the significant difference was in favour of those with lower family income in the family income variable; in advantage of internet users in internet usage variable; in advantage of city dweller students for the sub-dimension of water conservation in the variable of the settlement they live in; in advantage of villager students for the sub-dimension of water sensitivity; in advantage of those who had less time to be in nature for the sub-dimension of water sensitivity in the variable of being in the natural environment. Water literacy can be added to environmental issues in order to make students gain water literacy in the primary education program.

Keywords

Water Literacy, Water Conservation, Water Sensitivity, Water Awareness, Secondary School Students

References

• Baltacı, A. (2018). A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research. Bitlis Eren University Social Science Journal, 7(1), 231-274.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, E, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem.
• Cansaran, A., & Yıldırım, C. (2021). Water and soil resources. In Orçun Bozkurt (Eds.), Environment education, 59-116. Ankara: Pegem.
• Çankaya, C. (2014). Development awareness of pre-service science teachers on sustainable water use.(Unpublished master’s thesis). EskişehirOsmangazi University Education Sciences Institute, Eskişehir.
• Ergin, Ö., Akpınar, E., Küçükcankurtaran, E., & Çoban, Ü. G. (2009). Water awareness: developing teaching material for water education. Project No: 107K291.
• Ekinci, F., Acıelma, F., Küçükseymen, Y., Öztürk, M. B., Kubilay, F., Yelseli, A., & Toprak, F. (2022). Examination of water literacy level of secondary students in terms of different variables (istanbul example). Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 12(1), 51-66.
• Febriani, A. (2017). Water literacy in developing country a case study for indonesia. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Lund University, Sweden.
• Güçlü, Y. (2021). Ecological impact. In Orçun Bozkurt (Eds.), Environment education, 59-116. Ankara: Pegem.
• KalkınmaBakanlığı (2018). Eleventh development plan (2019-2023): Sustainable management of environment and natural resources working group report. Publication No: Kb: 2994 - Öik: 776, Ankara.
• Karasar, N. (2014). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel
• Küçük, A. (2022). Investigation of turkish middle and high school students’ water literacy as a factor predicting targets for sustainable development goals. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 192-201.
• McCarroll, M., & Hamann, H. (2020). What we know about water: a water literacy review. Water, 12(10), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102803.
• Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., López-Belmonte, J., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). Flipped learning approach as educational ınnovation in water literacy. Water, 12(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020574.
• Özdemir, O. (2017). Ecological literacy and environment education. (2nd Extended Edition). Pegem: Ankara.
• Sherchan, S., Pasha, F., Weinman, B., Nelson, L. F., Sharma, C. F., Therkelsen, J., & Drexler, D. (2016). Seven faculties in search of a mission: a proposed interdisciplinary course on water literacy. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(2), 171-183, DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2016.1164098
• Sözcü, U. & Türker, A. (2020a). Development of water literacy scale. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 55(2), 1155-1168.
• Sözcü, U. & Türker, A. (2020b). Examining the water literacy levels of high school students according to some variables. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6, 569-582. Doi: 10.20448/journal.522.2020.63.569.582.
• Şahin, B. (2016). A global problem: water scarcity and virtual water trade. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hitit University, Social Sciences Institute, Çorum.
• Tian, K., Wang, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investigation and evaluation of water literacy of urban residents in china based on data correction method. Water Policy, 23(1), 77–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.160.
• Wang, Y. H. Chang, M. C., & Liou, J. R. (2019). Effects of water-saving education in taiwan on public water knowledge, attitude, and behavior intention change. Water Policy, 21(5), 964–979. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2019.173.
• Yentür, M. M., Sözcü, U., &Aydınözü, D. (2022). Determining the water literacy levels of high school students: the case of istanbul. OndokuzMayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 41(1), 381-421.
• https://www.wwf.org.tr/calismalarimiz/tatli_su/. 12.06.2022 accessed on.
• https://mgm.gov.tr/genel/hidrometeoroloji.aspx?s=3 . 18.07.2022 accessed on.