Research Article

Evaluation of STEM Education Supported by Nature Courses and Informatics According to Students’ Views

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 28, 2023
EN

Evaluation of STEM Education Supported by Nature Courses and Informatics According to Students’ Views

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the courses designed using the STEM approach, which combines nature-based learning environments with informatics from the perspective of students. Under the scope of nature-based courses, such as "Drama, Biomimicry, Ecoprint, Basic Electricity, Metamorphosis, and Bridging Science" were conducted for 10 days. Following, informatics-based courses such as “Digital Storytelling, Algorithm and Augmented Reality/Visual Block Programming” were instructed to students and employed to perform STEM activities by getting the inspiration of the courses. Then the views of 37 middle school students who participated in the courses were collected using a semi-structured form of qualitative data collection tools in four categories: Preparation, Instructional Material, Process, and Contribution. The data were analyzed by categorical content analysis, and the findings related to each subcategory, concept, and code for each category were presented in tables. In order to increase coding reliability, the opinions of two field experts and a measurement and evaluation expert were consulted. Consensus was reached with another expert, resulting in a 95% agreement. According to the study results, the students expressed positive opinions on the courses in general and stated that courses and game-based lessons that are based on learning by doing and experiencing are more interesting, and that the combination of nature-based learning and information technology is an important experience for them.

Keywords

Nature-based learning , Informatics , STEM , Middle School Student

References

  1. Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2008). Active learning (10th edition). İstanbul: Biliş Publications.
  2. Ayar, M. C. (2015). First-hand experience with engineering design and career interest in engineering: an informal stem education case study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1655-1675. DOI:10.12738/estp.2015.6.0134
  3. Avcı, E., Okuşluk, F., & Yıldırım, B. (2021). The effect of stem supported robotic coding activities on gifted students' attitude towards coding. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, Volume 7, Issue 2, 228-235.
  4. Buldur, S., Bursal, M., Yücel, E., & Yalçın Erik, N. (2018). The effect of an interdisciplinary nature education project on the affective characteristics and environmental awareness of secondary school students. Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research, 7 (5), 284-303. http://www.itobiad.com/issue/41845/498087.
  5. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for stem education: challenges and opportunities. NSTA press
  6. Cleaver, S. (2007). How green classrooms are reconnecting kids with nature. Instructor, p20-24 Nov-Dec. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ792953
  7. Çiftçi, S., & Bildiren, A. (2020). The effect of coding courses on the cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills of preschool children. Computer Science Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1696169
  8. Demirel, Ö. (2006). Öğretme sanatı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  9. Dönmez, İ. (2017). Opinions of students and team coaches on robotic tournaments within the framework of stem education (science heroes meet example). Journal of Education, Science and Technology Research, 2(1), 25-42.
  10. Gencer, A. S., Doğan, H., Bilen, K., & Bilge, C. A. N. (2019). Integrated stem education models. Journal of Pamukkale University Faculty of Education, 45(45), 38-55.
APA
Keskinkılıç, F., & Ünal, M. (2023). Evaluation of STEM Education Supported by Nature Courses and Informatics According to Students’ Views. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 838-857. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1306815