Opinions of Teachers' Conducting Science Courses Regarding Outdoor Education: A Phenomenological Study
Abstract
This study aims to determine the opinions of teachers who conduct science courses regarding out-of-school learning (OSL) environments. The participants who enrolled in this study were designed with a phenomenology research design, consisting of 33 teachers working in public schools in a district of Sakarya province. The interview form was developed by the researchers and used as a data collection tool. The data were analyzed through content analysis. According to the results, the subject area in which most OSL activities are carried out in science lessons is the content of "Living Beings and Life." According to the findings, the teachers emphasized informing the students about the content of science and learning outcomes and preparing a plan before the OSL activities were organized. Besides, they insisted on the importance of the teacher's role as a guide for the students during the implementation of the OSL activities and evaluating the students who made observations during the OSL at the end of the process. Regarding the challenges experienced in implementing OSL activities, issues such as paperwork and official transactions were mentioned during the planning of the activities. Besides, the problems encountered in classroom management, the difficulties experienced in virtual trips, and the disinterested attitudes of the individuals involved in the community awareness activities were also indicated.
Keywords
out-of-school learning , phenomenology , science education , teachers' opinions
References
- Anderson, D., Kisiel, J. & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator, 49, 365-386.
- Anderson, D., Lucas, K.B., Ginns, I.S. & Dierking, L.D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84, 658-679.
- Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.
- Creswell, J.W. (2017). Nitel Yöntemler. S. B. Demir (Çev. Ed.) & Y.Dede (Çev. Ed.). Araştırma Deseni: Nitel, Nicel ve Karma Yöntem Yaklaşımları. (3.baskı, s. 183-213) içinde. Eğiten Kitap. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2014, 4.Baskı).
- Dairianathan, A. & Subramaniam, R. (2011). Learning about Inheritance in an Out-of-School Setting. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1079–1108.
- Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School science review, 87(320), 1-5.
- Ersoy, A. (2019). Fenomenoloji. Ahmet Saban (Ed.) & Ali Ersoy (Ed.), Eğitimde Nitel Araştırma Desenleri (s.82-138) içinde. Anı Yayıncılık.
- Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging In-School and Out-of-School Learning: Formal, Nonformal, and Informal Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
- Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S. & Eylon, B.S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: a model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.822166
- Faria, C. & Chagas, I. (2012). Investigating school-guided visits to an aquarium: What roles for science teachers? International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 3(2), 159–174. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.674652