Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables

Şeyma Çalık Bostancı; Erhan Zor

doi:10.51535/tell.1417901

EN

Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables

Abstract

This study aims to examine the attitudes of preservice science teachers towards nanotechnology according to various variables such as gender, class level, and academic achievement. The cross-sectional survey method was employed in the study. The sample of the study consists of 199 preservice science teachers (170 females, 29 males). The used data collection tool is the Attitude Scale Towards Nanotechnology consisting of three sub-components (positive, negative, and utility). Descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation scores were used in the descriptive analysis of the data, while Independent Samples t-test and ANOVA were used in the inferential analysis. According to the results, it was observed that the attitudes of preservice science teachers towards nanotechnology were at a “high” level. When the attitudes of preservice science teachers towards nanotechnology were examined according to the gender variable, it was determined that male preservice science teachers had a higher average attitude score than female preservice science teachers. When the attitudes were examined based on the class level variable, it was observed that the preservice science teachers in the 3rd year of education had the highest average attitude score, while those in the 2nd year had the lowest average attitude score. Regarding the academic achievement level variable, it was observed that the preservice science teachers with high academic achievement had a higher average attitude score than those with low academic achievement.

Keywords

Attitude, Nanotechnology, Preservice science teachers.

Ethical Statement

Ethical principles were taken into consideration throughout the study. A consent form was presented to the preservice science teachers, assuring them that their participation was voluntary and that they could freely terminate their participation at any point in the study.

References

Ahmed, T., Imdad, S., Yaldram, K., & Raza, S. M. (2015). Awareness and attitude about nanotechnology in Pakistan. Journal of Nano Education, 7, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2015.1074
Baalousha, M., How, W., Valsami-Jones, E., & Lead, J. R. (2014). Overview of Environmental Nanoscience. In E. Valsami-Jones & J. R. Lead (Eds.), Frontiers of Nanoscience (pp. 1–54). Elsevier.
Bayda, S., Adeel, M., Tuccinardi, T., Cordani, M., & Rizzolio, F. (2020). The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: From chemical–physical applications to nanomedicine. Molecules, 25, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010112
Bhushan, B. (2015). Governance, policy, and legislation of nanotechnology: A perspective. Microsystem Technologies, 21, 1137–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2511-x
Burri, R. V., & Bellucci, S. (2008). Public perception of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9286-7
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Scientific research methods. Pegem Academy.
Chang, S.-N., Yeung, Y.-Y., & Cheng, M. H. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitudes towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9162-6
Chen, M.-F., Lin, Y.-P., & Cheng, T.-J. (2013). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan. Technovation, 33, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008
Chien-Yun, D., Wan-Fei, C., Yu-Hsi, Y., & Chia-Hung, Y. (2012). A study on modification of knowledge, attitude and practice on vocational high school electronics courses integrated with nanotechnology concept. International Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering, 4(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.5383/ijtee.04.01.011
Çalık, Ş., Koç, A., Şenel-Zor, T., Zor, E., & Aslan, O. (2021). Content analysis of nano-news published between 2011 and 2018 in Turkish newspapers. Nanoethics, 15, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00391-x

Ekli, E. (2010). Investigation of the elementary school secondary level students' basic knowledge and opinions about nanotechnology and attitudes towards technology in relation to some variables [Unpublished Master’s Dissertation]. Muğla University.
Ekli, E., & Şahin, N. (2010). Science teachers and teacher candidates’ basic knowledge, opinions and risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2667–2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.392
Emrahoğlu, N., & Öztürk, A. (2010). The effect of metacognition on the prospective science teachers’ academic achievement: an ex post facto research. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 18–30.
Erkoç, Ş. (2012). Nanoscience and nanotechnology. ODTU Publishing.
Fang, R., Teng, C., & Chen, C. (2007). How Taiwanese and Americans think about technology. Journal of Technology Education, 18(2), 7–23.
Fischer, A. R. H., Dijk, H. van, Jonge, J. de, & Rowe, G. (2012). Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production. Public Understanding of Science, 22(7), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512440220
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ghattas, N. I. (2015). Middle and high school science teachers’ attitudes toward nanotechnology and intention to implement it in science classrooms [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. West Virginia University.
Güzeloğlu, E. (2015). Nano innovation with smart products: The youth’s nanotech awareness, perception of benefits/risks. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 274–297. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v12i1.2903
İpek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, Ş., & Erkoç, A. (2020). Opinions of biology teachers about nanoscience and nanotechnology education in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.15
Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828
Jones, M. Gail, Gardner, G. E., Falvo, M., & Taylor, A. (2015). Precollege nanotechnology education: A different kind of thinking. Nanotechnol Rev, 4(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0014
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2014). Dünden bugüne insan ve insanlar: Sosyal psikolojiye giriş. Evrim Yayınevi.
Kamanlıoğlu, E. B., & Güzeloğlu, C. (2010). Frames about nanotechnology agenda in Turkish media, 2005-2009. International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, 4(4), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060593
Khalid, S., Butt, N. M., & Ahmed, F. (2016). A mixed-method study of attitudes of social scientists toward nanotechnology in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(2), 84–95.
Kim, H.-J., & Hong, H.-G. (2010). Science teachers’ perception and attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 54(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.5.633
Kim, H.-J., Hong, H.-G., & Hong, J.-H. (2011). High school students’ perception and attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 55(1), 104– 111.https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2011.55.1.104
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
Lan, Y. L. (2012). Development of an attitude scale to assess K-12 teachers’ attitudes toward nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.651657
Lee, C. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281474
Macoubrie, J. (2006). Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Understanding of Science, 15(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506056993
Manjunatha, S. B., Biradar, D. P., & Aladakatti, Y. R. (2016). Nanotechnology and its applications in agriculture: A review. J. Farm Sci, 29(1), 1–13.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Much, R. A., Basheer, A., Zahaika, S., & Hugerat, M. (2019). Nanotechnology among teachers and students in the Arab sector in Israel: Awareness and attitudes. Creative Education, 10, 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.106086
Murty, B. S., Shankar, P., Raj, B., Rath, B. B., & Murday, J. (2013). Textbook of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Nerlich, B., Clarke, D. D., & Ulph, F. (2007). Risks and benefits of nanotechnology: How young adults perceive possible advances in nanomedicine compared with conventional treatments. Health, Risk and Society, 9(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570701306856
Newberry, D. M. (2012). A modularized approach to nanotechnology education: Opportunities, challenges and requirements.12th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE- NANO). United Kingdom, 1-2. http://doi.org/10.1109/NANO.2012.6322144
Ng, W. (2009). Nanoscience and nanotechnology for the middle years. Teaching Science, 55(2), 16-24.
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Education. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. sınıflar). https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx? PID=325
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. National Science Foundation. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-2336-5
Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T. J., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2008). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.361
Sebastian, V., & Gimenez, M. (2016). Teaching nanoscience and thinking nano at the macroscale: Nanocapsules of wisdom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.075
Şenel-Zor, T. (2017). The effect of activity based nanoscience and nanotechnology education on preservice science teachers’ awareness and conceptual understanding of nanoscience and nanotechnology [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
Şenel-Zor, T., & Kan, A. (2018). A study of developing an attitude scale towards nanotechnology for pre-service science fields teachers. III. Ines International Education and Social Science Congress 2018 Abstracts Books. Çizgi Kitabevi.
Şenel-Zor, T., Aslan, O., & Selvi, M. (2019). Investigation of preservice science fields teachers’ attitues to nanotechnology according to various variables. EJER Congress 2019 Conference Proceeding, Anı Yayıncılık.
Şenel-Zor, T., & Kan, A. (2021). Nanotechnology attitude scale development study for pre-service science fields teachers. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.23753
Şenocak, E. (2017). A framing theory-based content analysis of a Turkish newspaper’s coverage of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 19(255). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3955-y
Singh, N. A. (2017). Nanotechnology innovations, industrial applications and patents. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 15(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0612-8
The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
Tufan, E., & Güdek, B. (2008). Müzik öğretmenliği mesleğine yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(1), 25–40.
Winkelmann, K., & Bhushan, B. (2017). Global perspectives of nanotechnology education. In B. Bhushan (Ed.), Springer handbook of nanotechnology (4 th ed., pp. 1603-1624). Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Yakar, Z. (2018). Development of nanotechnology. In M. Ersöz, A. Işıtan, & M. Balaban (Ed.), Nanotechnology 1 fundamentals of nanotechnology (pp. 31–46). Bilal Ofset.
Zhang, J., Wang, G., & Lin, D. (2015). High support for nanotechnology in China: A case study in Dalian. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv020
Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence (1st Ed.). McGraw-Hil.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Science Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Şeyma Çalık Bostancı
0000-0002-3640-5195
Türkiye

Erhan Zor ^*
0000-0002-2325-6354
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 9, 2024

Publication Date

June 30, 2024

Submission Date

January 11, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 14, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1417901

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA59JC96UG

APA

Çalık Bostancı, Ş., & Zor, E. (2024). Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1417901

AMA

1.Çalık Bostancı Ş, Zor E. Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables. TELL. 2024;6(1):76-90. doi:10.51535/tell.1417901

Chicago

Çalık Bostancı, Şeyma, and Erhan Zor. 2024. “Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6 (1): 76-90. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1417901.

EndNote

Çalık Bostancı Ş, Zor E (June 1, 2024) Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6 1 76–90.

IEEE

[1]Ş. Çalık Bostancı and E. Zor, “Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables”, TELL, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–90, June 2024, doi: 10.51535/tell.1417901.

ISNAD

Çalık Bostancı, Şeyma - Zor, Erhan. “Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6/1 (June 1, 2024): 76-90. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1417901.

JAMA

1.Çalık Bostancı Ş, Zor E. Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables. TELL. 2024;6:76–90.

MLA

Çalık Bostancı, Şeyma, and Erhan Zor. “Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 76-90, doi:10.51535/tell.1417901.

Vancouver

1.Şeyma Çalık Bostancı, Erhan Zor. Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology According to Various Variables. TELL. 2024 Jun. 1;6(1):76-90. doi:10.51535/tell.1417901

Cited By

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Nanobiyoteknolojiye Yönelik Tutumlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1566649

26172 20107