Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Rethinking Teacher Education in the ChatGPT Era through a Currere Perspective

Volume: 7 Number: 1 June 30, 2025
EN

Rethinking Teacher Education in the ChatGPT Era through a Currere Perspective

Abstract

This study focuses on the potential impact of generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT—which are capable of performing cognitive tasks such as knowing, summarizing, interpreting, applying, analyzing, reasoning, and creative problem solving—on teacher education and curriculum design. Written texts used both as learning activities and as evaluative tools are considered representations of effective learning and cognitive processes. As the study is framed within a literature review based on the currere approach, it integrates both a systematic review of relevant sources and autobiographical references. GenAI has emerged as a cognitive artifact that enables both teachers and students to assign and engage in complex cognitive tasks. To ensure the meaningful use of this cognitive artifact, the currere method is proposed as a pedagogical framework that encourages students to focus on their own learning and meaning-making journeys by reflecting on their life and educational experiences. Moreover, the concept of embodied cognition is emphasized as a valuable perspective in defining the cognitive domain of the learning process. It is also evident that the interaction with GenAI, which often takes place in a space of solitude intertwined with dialogic exchanges, requires adherence to ethical principles. When learners focus on their own processes of meaning-making, they can perceive the connection between academic knowledge and their personal life narratives. Consequently, the texts produced will be not only academically grounded but also personally original.

Keywords

ChatGPT , Currere , GenAI ethics , Curriculum and GenAI , Student teachers

References

  1. REFERENCES Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence as a lifelong learning self efficacy: Usage and competence scale. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6 (2), 288-302.
  2. Baszile, D. T. (2017). On the virtues of currere. Currere Exchange Journal, 1 (1).
  3. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al. Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1-10.
  4. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, qjae044.
  5. Cacho, R. M. (2024). Integrating Generative AI in University Teaching and Learning: A Model for Balanced Guidelines. Online Learning, 28(3), 55-81.
  6. Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257-295.
  7. Cassinadri, G. (2024). ChatGPT and the technology-education tension: Applying contextual virtue epistemology to a cognitive artifact. Philosophy & Technology, 37(1), 14.
  8. de Barros, E. C. (2024). Understanding the influence of digital technology on human cognitive functions: A narrative review. IBRO Neuroscience Reports.
  9. Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1166682). Frontiers Media SA.
  10. Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023). ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations. Scientific reports, 13(1), 15310.
APA
Akbaş, O. (2025). Rethinking Teacher Education in the ChatGPT Era through a Currere Perspective. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 7(1), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1697199