BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AFLATOXIGENIC FUNGI ON PEANUT: FOR THE PRE-HARVEST APPROACH
Abstract
This study was carried out to determine the efficacy of different applications of a biopesticide for reduction of aflatoxin contamination in peanut. The biopesticide, afla-guard, delivers a nontoxigenic Aspergillus flavus to the field where it competes with naturally occurring toxigenic fungus. Biocontrol treatments included: (ı) soil application during sowing, (ıı) multiple application during sowing and 40 days after planting, (ııı) foliar application at 60 days after planting (ıv) control (untreated plots). Biopesiticide was applied to peanut plots in 2015 and 2016 in Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. Peanuts were collected from control and treated plots at harvest-drying-pre-storage periods and analysed for aflatoxins. Aflatoxin concentrations were generally quite low in 2015, also the aflatoxin concentration in treated samples (from 0.04 to 0.71 μg/kg) was reduced by 97.38 to 99.82% compared with controls (from 21.84 to 27.12 μg/kg). In 2016, reductions were also noted for all biocontrol treatments (from 89.07 to 92.39%) compared with controls. In conjunction with the reductions in aflatoxin contamination, biocontrol treatments produced significant reductions with biopesticide in peanut. Therefore, it can be said that a biological control method is a promising approach for controlling aflatoxin.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Project Number
Thanks
References
- Anonymous, 2014. http://www.syngenta-us.com/currentlabel/ afla-guard-gr. Afla-Guard® GR
- Anonymous, 2017. The meteorological data for Adana. The Turkish State Meteorological Service Adana Regional Directorship, 2015, 2016.
- Arıoglu, H. 2000. Peanuts cultivation breeding. Adana, Turkey: Cukurova University Faculty of Agriculture publishing.
- Arzandeh, S. and S. Jinap. 2011. Effect of initial aflatoxin concentration, heating time and roasting temperature on aflatoxin reduction in contaminated peanuts and process optimization using response surface modeling. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46: 485–491.
- Atehnkeng, J., P.S. Ojiambob, P.J. Cotty and R. Bandyopadhyay. 2014. Field efficacy of a mixture of atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Link: FR vegetative compatibility groups in preventing aflatoxin contamination in maize (Zea mays L.). Biol. Control, 72: 62-70.
- Chepsergon, J., E.K. Kiprop, L.A. Mwamburi. Biocontrol of aflatoxins in corn using atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus. Review International Journal of Science and Research. 12:1954-1958.
- Cole, R.J., T.H. Sanders, J.W. Dorner and P.D. Blankenship. 1989. Environmental conditions required to induce preharvest aflatoxin contamination of groundnuts: Summary of six years’ research. In: Aflatoxin contamination of groundnut: Proceedings of the international workshop, ed. Hall SD., 279-287, ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, AP, India.
- Denizel, T. and O. Kosker. 1972. A mycological survey of various kinds of nuts commercially available in the UK with reference to mycotoxins. University of Ankara, Turkey: Yearbook of the Faculty of Agriculture.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
İsılay Lavkor
*
Türkiye
Halis Arıoglu
This is me
İsıl Var
This is me
Sevcan Oztemız
This is me
Publication Date
June 14, 2019
Submission Date
December 11, 2018
Acceptance Date
December 11, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 24 Number: 1
Cited By
Practical considerations will ensure the continued success of pre-harvest biocontrol using non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1873731Microbial volatilome in food safety. Current status and perspectives in the biocontrol of mycotoxigenic fungi and their metabolites
Biocontrol Science and Technology
https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2023.2205616