Analysis research public health trends with the RE-AIM model and vosviewer : a literature review

Abstract

Objective: This study uses the VOSviewer tool to conduct research mapping analysis in order to examine public health research using the RE-AIM Framework. The purpose of this study was to determine the use of RE-AIM shells in public health research. And the Vosviewer application can be used to read the distribution of research evaluated with RE-AIM so that it can be used by researchers to obtain novelty in research. Methods: Descriptive analysis is used with a quantitative bibliometric approach in this research strategy. Based on Web of Science search results, the research data was acquired with the keywords “sanitation, public health, RE-AIM”. Results: From the data produced in the last five years (2017–2022), A total of 279 scholarly articles were acquired. The findings demonstrated that each year, more study has been conducted on public health and RE-AIM, and the topic of sanitation or enviromental health and RE-AIM has never been conducted. Conclusion: Currently, research on the subject of public health, environmental health and RE-AIM is worthwhile, and it involves research that is still infrequently done. It is therefore anticipated that this research will serve as a guide for selecting the research topic.

Keywords

• Bibliometrics
• VOSviewer
• Public Health
• RE-AIM

References

1. Escaron AL, Martinez C, Vega-Herrera C, Enger SM. RE-AIM analysis of a community-partnered policy, systems, and envi-ronment approach to increasing consumption of healthy foods in schools serving low-income populations. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(5):899–909.
2. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA VT. Evaluating the Impact of Health Promotion Programs: Using the RE-AIM framework. Health Educ Res [Internet]. 2006; Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02872666
3. Stange KC. Commentary: RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2020;8.
4. Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementa-tion, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14.
5. Messing S, Rutten A, Abu-Omar K, Ungerer-Rohrich U, Goodwin L, Burlacu I, et al. How Can Physical Activity Be Promoted Among Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review of Reviews Across Settings. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2019;7.
6. Harden SM, Smith ML, Ory MG, Smith-Ray RL, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. RE-AIM in Clinical, Community, and Corporate Settings: Perspectives, Strategies, and Recommendations to Enhance Public Health Impact. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2018;6.
7. Indig D, Lee K, Grunseit A, Milat A, Bauman A. Pathways for scaling up public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;18.
8. McCreight MS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE, Ayele RA, Leonard CA, Gilmartin HM, et al. Using the Practical, Robust Implemen-tation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to qualitatively assess multilevel contextual factors to help plan, implement, evaluate, and disseminate health services programs. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(6):1002–11.

9. Jones A, Magnusson R, Swinburn B, Webster J, Wood A, Sacks G, et al. Designing a Healthy Food Partnership: lessons from the Australian Food and Health Dialogue. BMC Public Health. 2016;16.
10. Rabin BA, McCreight M, Battaglia C, Ayele R, Burke RE, Hess PL, et al. Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adapta-tions Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2018;6.
11. Asante KP, Afari-Asiedu S, Abdulai MA, Dalaba MA, Carrion D, Dickinson KL, et al. Ghana’s rural liquefied petroleum gas program scale up: A case study. ENERGY Sustain Dev. 2018;46:94–102.
12. King DK, Shoup JA, Raebel MA, Anderson CB, Wagner NM, Ritzwoller DP, et al. Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks: A Qualitative Study. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2020;8.
13. Kerkhoff AD, Sachdev D, Mizany S, Rojas S, Gandhi M, Peng J, et al. Evaluation of a novel community-based COVID-19 “Test-to-Care” model for low-income populations. PLoS One. 2020;15(10).
14. Pihlajamaki J, Mannikko R, Tilles-Tirkkonen T, Karhunen L, Kolehmainen M, Schwab U, et al. Digitally supported program for type 2 diabetes risk identification and risk reduction in real-world setting: protocol for the StopDia model and random-ized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19.
15. Rahman FF, Haris F. COVID-19 emergency response in Southeast Asian region: A bibliographic analysis using VOSviewer software. Bali Med J. 2022;11(3):1656–9.
16. DF Al Husaeni AN. Bibliometrik menggunakan VOSviewer dengan Publish or Perish (menggunakan data Google Scholar): Dari pengolahan langkah demi langkah bagi pengguna hingga contoh praktis dalam analisis artikel pembelajaran digital pada masa sebelum dan sesudah pandemi Covid. J Sains dan Tek ASEAN. 2022;2(1):19–46.
17. SA Nugraha AN. Bibliometric analysis of magnetite nanoparticle production research during 2017-2021 using Vosviewer. Indones J Multydisciplinary Res. 2022;2(2):327–32.
18. DF Al Husaeni AN. Bibliometric using VOSviewer with Publish or Perish (using google scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandem-ic. ASEAN J Sci Eng. 2022;2 (1):19–46.
19. MacDonald B, Gibson AM, Janssen X, Hutchinson J, Headley S, Matthews T, et al. Should We Scale-Up? A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of an Intervention Targeting Sedentary Office Workers Using the RE-AIM QuEST Framework. Int J Envi-ron Res Public Health. 2020;17(1).
20. Nacke B, Zeiler M, Kuso S, Klesges LM, Jacobi C, Waldherr K. A systematic review of reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of Internet-based interventions to prevent eating disorders in adults. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31:29–37.
21. Moore L, de Silva-Sanigorski A, Moore SN. A socio-ecological perspective on behavioural interventions to influence food choice in schools: alternative, complementary or synergistic? Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(6):1000–5.
22. Bottorff JL, Huisken A, Hopkins M, Nesmith C. A RE-AIM evaluation of Healthy Together: a family-centred program to support children’s healthy weights. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1).
23. Lin CP, Li TY, Zou GY, Li XD, Ling L, Chen W. Implementation Evaluation of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Pro-mote the Use of Respiratory Protective Equipment Among Migrant Workers Exposed to Organic Solvents in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2022;10.
24. Brazil K, Cardwell C, Carter G, Clarke M, Corry DAS, Fahey T, et al. Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling old-er adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1).
25. Clarke NE, Dyer CEF, Amaral S, Tan G, Nery SV. Improving uptake and sustainability of sanitation interventions in timor-leste: A case study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1–13.
26. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM BS. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the re-aim framework. Am J Public Heal. 1999;89:1322–77.
27. Linder S, Ferschl S, Abu -Omar K, Ziemainz H, Reimers AK. Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non-/quasi-experimental trials. Prev Med REPORTS. 2022;29.
28. Zeiler M, Kuso S, Nacke B, Klesges LM, Waldherr K. Evaluating reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of In-ternet-based interventions to prevent eating disorders in adolescents: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31:38–47.
29. Aranda-Diaz A, Imbert E, Strieff S, Graham-Squire D, Evans JL, Moore J, et al. Implementation of rapid and frequent SARS-CoV2 antigen testing and response in congregate homeless shelters. PLoS One. 2022;17(3).
30. Konrad LM, Ribeiro CG, Maciel EC, Tomicki C, Brito FA, Almeida FA, et al. Evaluating the implementation of the active life improving health behavior change program “BCP-VAMOS” in primary health care: Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2022;10.
31. D’Lima D, Soukup T, Hull L. Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: An Updated Sys-tematic Review and Exploration of Pragmatic Application. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2022;9.
32. Hohmeier KC, Baker P, Storey C, Martin N, Gatwood JD. Exploring the Membership Pharmacy Model: Initial impact and feasibility. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2023;63(2):672-+.
33. Choma EA, Treat-Jacobson DJ, Keller-Ross ML, Wolfson J, Martin L, McMahon SK. Using the RE-AIM framework to evalu-ate physical activity-based fall prevention interventions in older adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review. Transl Behav Med. 2023;13(1):42–52.
34. Muttaqien Z, Wasityastuti W, Sofyana M, Agustiningsih D, Wibowo RA. A longitudinal controlled signage intervention to increase stair use at university buildings: Process and impact evaluation using RE-AIM framework. Front PUBLIC Heal. 2023;11.
35. Welch V, Pottie K, Gaudet C, Thuku M, Mallard R, Spenceley S, et al. Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review. Arch PUBLIC Heal. 2023;81(1).
36. Raman R, Lathabhai H, Pattnaik D, Kumar C, Nedungadi P. Research contribution of bibliometric studies related to sus-tainable development goals and sustainability [Internet]. Vol. 5, Discover Sustainability. Springer International Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00182-w
37. Zamzuri Z. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Malaysia using latent dirichlet allocation | Suatu Analisis Bibli-ometrik Kajian COVID-19 di Malaysia menggunakan Agihan Dirichlet Terpendam. Sains Malaysiana. 2021;50(6):1815–1825.
38. Jaipakdee J, Jiamjarasrangsi W, Lohsoonthorn V, Lertmaharit S. Effectiveness of a self-management support program for Thais with type 2 diabetes: Evaluation according to the RE-AIM framework. Nurs Health Sci. 2015;17(3):362–9.
39. Rosenblum AJ, Wend CM, Ide RA, Owens MA, Cutchins CA, Levy MJ. Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Encounters by Emer-gency Medical Services Physicians Using the RE-AIM Framework. J PUBLIC Heal Manag Pract. 2023;29(2):E58–64.
40. McMahon E, Van Wyk C, Pena TG, Samuels LR, Teeters LA, Worsley SB, et al. Feasibility evaluation of the Reaching Out to Kids with Emotional Trauma (ROcKET) intervention in an elementary school: a single-arm, single-centre, feasibility study based on the RE-AIM framework. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3).
41. Yilmaz Y, Sarikaya O, Senol Y, Baykan Z, Karaca O, Yilmaz ND, et al. RE-AIMing COVID-19 online learning for medical stu-dents: a massive open online course evaluation. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1).
42. Bethany M Kwan 1, Hannah L McGinnes 1, Marcia G Ory 2, Paul A Estabrooks 3, Jeanette A Waxmonsky 1 REG 1. RE-AIM in the Real World: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation in Clinical and Community Settings. Front Public Heal . 2019;22:7:345.