Commentary: Expanding the horizons of RE-AIM framework in public health research

Abstract

Objective: This commentary critically examines Yuliawati et al.’s 2024 review, “Analysis of research public health trends with the RE-AIM model and VOSviewer: A literature review,” which investigates the application of the “Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM)” framework in public health research. The review highlights trends in 279 studies conducted between 2017 and 2022 and draws attention to the insufficient focus on environmental health and sanitation interventions within the RE-AIM framework. The objective is to address these gaps and propose future directions for broadening the framework's application. Methods: The commentary evaluates the methodology used by Yuliawati et al., with particular attention to their utilization of the VOSviewer tool to map trends in RE-AIM-based research. It also explores the identified research gaps and incorporates insights from existing literature to examine the barriers that limit RE-AIM’s application in environmental health and sanitation. Results: Yuliawati et al.’s review demonstrates growing interest in the RE-AIM framework, but points out a notable deficiency in its application to environmental health and sanitation interventions. This commentary identifies potential reasons for this gap, such as limited interdisciplinary collaboration and resource constraints, and suggests that addressing these challenges could improve RE-AIM’s effectiveness in these fields. Conclusion: This commentary advocates for future research to overcome the barriers to RE-AIM’s application in environmental health and sanitation. It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches and the need for a more adaptable framework to evaluate complex, multi-faceted public health challenges.

Keywords

• Public Health Research
• Implementation Science
• Longitudinal Data
• Environmental Health

References

1. Yuliawati R, Denny HM, Patriajati S, et al.Analysis research public health trends with the RE-AIM model and VOSviewer: A literature review.Turk J Public Health 2024;22(2): 224-34
2. Glasgow RE, Battaglia C, McCreight M, et al.Use of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to guide iterative adaptations: Applications, lessons learned, and future directions.Front Health Serv.2022 Oct 17;2:959565.doi:10.3389/frhs.2022.959565
3. Holtrop JS, Estabrooks PA, Gaglio B, et al.Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources.J Clin Transl Sci.2021 May 14;5(1):e126.doi:10.1017/cts.2021.789
4. van Eck NJ, Waltman L.Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.Scientometrics.2010 Aug;84(2):523-38.doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 Epub 2009 Dec 31.
5. Shaw RB, Sweet SN, McBride CB, et al.Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being.BMC Public Health.2019 Jun 24;19(1):803.doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7131-4
6. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM.Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework.Am J Public Health.1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7.doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322