Analysis of the efficiency of medical device utilisation in OECD countries
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this descriptive and cross-sectional study is to assess the efficiency of medical device utilisation in OECD countries in the context of health outcomes using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
Method: The sample of the study consists of 28 OECD countries. The medical device utilisation efficiency of the countries was evaluated within the framework of the input variables computed tomography scanners (CT), magnetic resonance imaging units (MRI), positron emission tomography scanners (PET), gamma cameras (GAM), mammography machines (MAM), radiotherapy equipment (RT) per million inhabitants and the output variables life expectancy (LE), satisfaction with healthcare system (SH) and perceived health status (PH). The data for 2022 were obtained from the OECD database. As this study used publicly available, aggregate data, no ethics committee approval was required. DEA was performed with input-oriented constant returns to scale (CCR) and variable returns to scale (BCC) models.
Results: According to all models, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland and Türkiye are efficient while Finland, Greece, Italy and Slovak Republic are inefficient. The country with the lowest efficiency is the United States according to CCR model and Greece according to BCC model. Türkiye, Israel and Poland were found to be the most referenced countries. MRI, CT and MAM are the input variables most in need of improvement.
Conclusion: It was found that 46% of the OECD countries evaluated in the study according to BCC model and 86% according to CCR model are relatively efficient in terms of medical device utilisation. It is recommended that inefficient countries should improve their idle inputs and avoid unnecessary use.
Keywords
Data Envelopment Analysis, Efficiency, Health, Medical Device, OECD
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Lao Y, Zhou L. Analysis of the medical device industry in German & US: evidence from medtronic and siemens. Adv Econ Manag Political Sci 2023;35(1):1-6.
- 2. Skyquest. Medical Devices Market Size, Share, Growth Analysis, By Device Type (Diagnostics imaging, Diabetic Cares), By End-User (Hospitals & Clinics, Homecare), By Region- Industry Forecast 2024-2031. In: Skyquest Technology [online]. Available at: https://www.skyquestt. com/report/medical-devices-market. Accessed February 10, 2025.
- 3. Kim D, Ryu G, Shin K, Lee K. What are the success factors for a partnership with global medical device companies?evidence from Korea. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 2021;7(4):237.
- 4. Matovu B, Baluka JW, Takuwa M, et al. Translating medical device innovations to market- a Ugandan perspective. BMC Res Notes 2023;16(1):164.
- 5. Nasir N, Molyneux S, Were F, Aderoba AK, Fuller S. Medical device regulation and oversight in African countries: a scoping review of literature and development of a conceptual framework. BMJ Glob Health 2023;8(8):e012308.
- 6. Maresova P, Hajek L, Krejcar O, Storek M, Kuca K. New regulations on medical devices in Europe: are they an opportunity for growth? Adm Sci 2020;10(1):16.
- 7. Farantos G, Koutsoukis N. Reforms in health information systems and comparative variation in the efficiency of a greek health region. Data Envel Anal Decis Sci 2017;(2):89-96.
- 8. Omir A, Satybaldin A, Ruzanov R, Khajiyeva G. Measuring healthcare efficiency in Kazakhstan: an application of data envelopment analysis. J East Eur Cent Asian Res 2024;11(1):1-15.
- 9. Zubir MZ, Noor AA, Mohd Rizal AM, et al. Approach in inputs & outputs selection of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measurement in hospitals: A systematic review. PLoS One 2024;19(8):e0293694.
- 10. Afonso GP, Figueira JR, Ferreira DC. Network Data Envelopment Analysis in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review. SSRN [online]. 2025. Available at: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5226372. Accessed February 10, 2025.