Digital health literacy: Hepatitis B information quality on internet platforms
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and reliability of internet-based information on Hepatitis B. With
increasing public reliance on online sources for health information, ensuring the accuracy and trustworthiness of this content is crucial.
Using standardized tools such as the DISCERN instrument and JAMA Benchmark Criteria, the study sought to assess online content
and identify reliable sources related to Hepatitis B, ultimately contributing to the promotion of digital health literacy.
Materials and Methods: The keywords “Hepatitis B” and “Hepatitis B disease” were searched on Google and Yandex. The first
10 result pages from each search engine were screened, yielding 190 websites. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant pages, 92
websites were evaluated. Each was assessed using the DISCERN tool and JAMA Benchmark Criteria. Readability scores were also
calculated using a standard readability formula.
Results: Of the 92 evaluated websites, 48 (52.17%) were from private hospitals, 13 (14.13%) from private individuals, and 9 (9.78%)
from private laboratories. DISCERN evaluations showed that none of the websites were of high or medium quality. According to
JAMA, 7 sites scored high (3 points), and 34 scored medium (2 points). The average readability score was 63.8±8.5, indicating
moderately easy-to-read content. However, most sites lacked comprehensive and referenced information.
Conclusion: The findings reveal that the majority of online content about Hepatitis B is of low quality and reliability. This underscores
the need for improved digital content standards and highlights the importance of directing users toward verified, high-quality health
information sources.
Keywords
DISCERN score, Hepatitis B, Internet-based information, JAMA Benchmark criteria, Readability
Ethical Statement
This study did not involve any
human or animal subjects, so ethical approval was not
required.
References
- 1. Çömlekçi M. F., Bozkanat E. İnfodemide dijital ortamda sağlık bilgisi edinme ve teyit davranışları. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2021;41:103-125.
- 2. Tozun N, Ozdogan O, Cakaloglu Y. et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections and risk factors in Turkey: a fieldwork TURHEP study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:1020-1026.
- 3. Özen N, Topbaş M. İnternet Ortamında ve Sosyal Medyada Doğru ve Güvenilir Sağlık Bilgisi Edinebilme. Farabi Medical Journal. 2023;2:27-32.
- 4. Binks P, Venkatesan S, Everitt A, et al. An evaluation and refinement of the ‘Hep B Story’ app, tailored to meet the community’s cultural needs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):710.
- 5. Verweel L, Newman A, Michaelchuk W, Packham T, Goldstein R , Brooks D , et al. The effect of digital interventions on related health literacy and skills for individuals living with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform 2023:177:105114.
- 6. McInnes N, Haglund BJ. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Inform Health Soc Care 2011;36(4):173-189.
- 7. Altun A, Askin A, Sengul I, Aghazada N, Aydin Y. Evaluation of YouTube videos as sources of information about complex regional pain syndrome. Korean J Pain. 2022;35(3):319-326.
- 8. Murray T, Hagey J, Willms D, Shillington R, Desjardins R. Health literacy in Canada: A healthy understanding. 2008.
- 9. Irwin SC, Lennon DT, Stanley CP, Gerard A Sheridan, James C Walsh. Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis. Surgeon. 2021;19:e507-e511.
- 10. Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, Alison Kitay, Timothy R Roberts, Aaron Daluiski. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1881-1887.