Pesticide safety and PPE use among farmers in a high-exposure region of Türkiye: An extended theory of planned behavior approach

Year 2025, Issue: Advanced Online Publication, 331 - 343

Ezgi Çelik Sapmaz , Meltem Çiçeklioğlu , Aslı Davas

Abstract

Objective: Despite widespread pesticide use in Türkiye’s agricultural regions, the actual protective behaviors of farmers remain underexplored. This study investigates personal protective equipment (PPE) use among farmers in Salihli, a district in Manisa with high pesticide intensity, through the lens of the extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 240 farmers from 15 villages, using face-to-face interviews to collect detailed sociodemographic, environmental, and psychosocial data. PPE use was evaluated using a structured scale aligned with ETPB constructs, and statistical associations were examined using t-tests and chi-square analyses.
Results: Although most farmers expressed awareness of pesticide risks, 66% reported unsafe PPE practices, particularly neglecting masks, gloves, and goggles. Surprisingly, an inverse relationship was observed between safe PPE use and ETPB constructs such as attitude, perceived control, and behavioral intention. Education, prior PPE training, and
frequency of pesticide use were positively associated with safer behaviors, while habitual and structural factors often undermined intention-based decision-making.
Conclusion: This study highlights critical gaps in the predictive power of traditional behavioral models in real-world agricultural settings. The findings call for rethinking intervention strategies-shifting from purely knowledge-based approaches to those that also address structural barriers, affordability, and entrenched habits.

Keywords

Pesticide exposure , Personal protective equipment , Extended Theory of Planned Behavior , Farmer safety , Behavioral interventions , Türkiye

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from [Republic of Türkiye, Ege University Medical Research Ethics Committee (TAEK), approval number: 23-10.1T/9]. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before their involvement in the study.

References

• 1. Damalas CA, Abdollahzadeh G. Farmers' use of personal protective equipment during handling of plant protection products: determinants of implementation. Sci Total Environ 2016;571:730-736.
• 2. Tiryaki O, Canhilal R, Horuz S. Use and risks of agricultural chemicals. J Inst Sci Technol Erciyes Univ 2010;26(2):154-169.
• 3. General Directorate of Occupational Health and Safety. Selection of personal protective equipment in pesticide work. Ankara: Ministry of Labor and Social Security; 2020.
• 4. Ayaz D, Öncel S. Effects of agricultural chemicals on the environment and human health and public health nursing. In: Public Health Nursing in Creating a Healthy and Safe Environment. 1st ed. Ankara: Turkey Clinics; 2022. p.66-75.
• 5. Yarpuz-Bozdogan N. The importance of personal protective equipment in pesticide applications in agriculture. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018;4:1-4.
• 6. Bördlein C. Behavioral safety for culture change. Jpn J Ergon 2022;58(Suppl):S171-02.
• 7. Wilson C, Tisdell C. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health, and sustainability costs. Ecol Econ 2001;39(3):449-462.
• 8. Skevas T, Oude Lansink A. Reducing pesticide use and pesticide impact by productivity growth: the case of Dutch arable farming. J Agric Econ 2014;65(1):191-211.
• 9. FAO, WHO. Guidelines for personal protection when handling and applying pesticides - International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management. In: FAO [online]. Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca5705en/CA5705EN.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2024.
• 10. Tama RAZ, Ying L, Mark MY, Hoque MM, Adnan KM, Sarker SA. Assessing farmers’ intention towards conservation agriculture by using the extended theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manage 2021;280:111654. 11. Savari M, Gharechaee H. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. J Clean Prod 2020;263:121512.
• 12. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50(2):179-211.
• 13. Despotovic J, Rodic V, Caracciolo F. Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of integrated pest management in Serbia: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod 2019;228:1196-1205.
• 14. Rezaei R, Damalas CA, Yazdanpanah M. Pesticide exposure reduction: Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand Iranian farmers’ intention to apply personal protective equipment. Sci Total Environ 2019;651(Pt 1):292-298.
• 15. Zhang X, Dong Y, Wang H. Application of extended theory of planned behavior to explore farmers' safe pesticide use behavior in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(15):8124.
• 16. Ganaie MI, Ganaie SA, Lone FA, Mayer IA, Ahmed P. Agriculturalists' attitudes towards pesticide use in the Pir Panjal Range of the Kashmir Himalayas. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2022;95(9):1859-1870.
• 17. Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Multivariable Model-building: A Pragmatic Approach to Regression Anaylsis based on Fractional Polynomials for Modelling Continuous Variables. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.
• 18. Worthington RL, Whittaker TA. Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns Psychol 2006;34(6):806-851.
• 19. Bondori A, Bagheri A, Damalas CA, Allahyari MS. Use of personal protective equipment towards pesticide exposure: farmers’ attitudes and determinants of behavior. Sci Total Environ 2018;639:1156-1163.
• 20. Damalas CA, Koutroubas SD. Farmers’ behavior in pesticide use: a key concept for improving environmental safety. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018;4:27-30.
• 21. Ozercan B, Taşcı R. Investigation of pesticide use in Turkey in terms of provinces, regions and pesticide groups. Ziraat Mühendisliği 2022;(375):75-88.
• 22. Hayran S, Çelik AD, Gül A. Pesticide use and risk perceptions among greenhouse farmers in Turkey: the case of Mersin province. Turk J Agric Econ 2022;28(1):1-10.
• 23. Rattanaselanon P, Lormphongs S, Chanvaivit S, Morioka I, Sanprakhon P. An occupational health education program for Thai farmers exposed to chlorpyrifos. Asia Pac J Public Health 2018;30(7):666-672.
• 24. Bagheri A, Emami N, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA. Pesticide handling practices, health risks, and determinants of safety behavior among Iranian apple farmers. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2018;24(8):2209-2223.
• 25. Joko T, Dewanti NAY, Dangiran HL. Pesticide poisoning and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in Indonesian farmers. J Environ Public Health 2020;2020:5379619.
• 26. Lovison Sasso E, Cattaneo R, Rosso Storck T, Spanamberg Mayer M, Sant’Anna V, Clasen B. Occupational exposure of rural workers to pesticides in a vegetable-producing region in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021;28(20):25758-25769.
• 27. Onen C, Avci S, Guneş G. Preventive health measures used by farmers in pesticide spraying. Turk J Public Health 2015;13(2):106-118.
• 28. Rkiek B, Manar N, Laraqui O, Laraqui S, Deschamps F, Laraqui Hossini CEH. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of farmers on the use of pesticides. Saf Health Work 2022;13(Suppl):S257.
• 29. Bondori AM, Bagheri A, Damalas CA. Protective behavior in chemical spraying among farmers of northern Iran. Environ Dev Sustain 2024;26(7):17673-17685.
• 30. Ansah MO, Skevas T. Adoption and intensity of use of personal protective equipment by agricultural pesticide handlers: empirical evidence from Peruvian agriculture. J Clean Prod 2024;446:141433.
• 31. Damalas CA, Hashemi SM. Pesticide risk perception and use of personal protective equipment among young and old cotton growers in northern Greece. Agrociencia 2010;44(3):363-371.
• 32. Damalas CA, Hashemi SM. Farmers’ safety behavior towards pesticide use: a case study from northern Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7(4):1904-1911.
• 33. Dasgupta S, Meisner C, Wheeler D, Xuyen K, Lam NT. Pesticide poisoning of farm workers—implications of blood test results from Vietnam. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007;210(2):121-132.
• 34. Ndayambaje B, Amuguni H, Coffin-Schmitt J, Sibo N, Ntawubizi M, VanWormer E. Pesticide application practices and knowledge among small-scale local rice growers and communities in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(23):4770.
• 35. Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Russell GA. Pesticide safety among farmworkers: perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(Suppl 2):233-240.
• 36. Bentler PM, Speckart G. Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychol Rev 1979;86(5):452-464.
• 37. Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:27-58.
• 38. Weng CY, Black C. Taiwanese farm workers’ pesticide knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and clothing practices. Int J Environ Health Res 2015;25(6):685-696.
• 39. Mehri A, Mazloomy SSM, Morowatisharifabad MA, Nadrian H. Determinants of helmet use behaviour among employed motorcycle riders in Yazd, Iran based on theory of planned behaviour. Injury 2011;42(9):864-869.