Pesticide safety and PPE use among farmers in a high-exposure region of Türkiye: An extended theory of planned behavior approach
Abstract
Objective: Despite widespread pesticide use in Türkiye’s agricultural regions, the actual protective behaviors of farmers remain underexplored. This study investigates personal protective equipment (PPE) use among farmers in Salihli, a district in Manisa with high pesticide intensity, through the lens of the extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 240 farmers from 15 villages, using face-to-face interviews to collect detailed sociodemographic, environmental, and psychosocial data. PPE use was evaluated using a structured scale aligned with ETPB constructs, and statistical associations were examined using t-tests and chi-square analyses.
Results: Although most farmers expressed awareness of pesticide risks, 66% reported unsafe PPE practices, particularly neglecting masks, gloves, and goggles. Surprisingly, an inverse relationship was observed between safe PPE use and ETPB constructs such as attitude, perceived control, and behavioral intention. Education, prior PPE training, and
frequency of pesticide use were positively associated with safer behaviors, while habitual and structural factors often undermined intention-based decision-making.
Conclusion: This study highlights critical gaps in the predictive power of traditional behavioral models in real-world agricultural settings. The findings call for rethinking intervention strategies-shifting from purely knowledge-based approaches to those that also address structural barriers, affordability, and entrenched habits.
Keywords
Pesticide exposure, Personal protective equipment, Extended Theory of Planned Behavior, Farmer safety, Behavioral interventions, Türkiye
Ethical Statement
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from [Republic of Türkiye, Ege University Medical Research Ethics Committee (TAEK), approval number: 23-10.1T/9]. Informed
consent was obtained from all participants before their involvement in the study.
References
- 1. Damalas CA, Abdollahzadeh G. Farmers' use of personal protective equipment during handling of plant protection products: determinants of implementation. Sci Total Environ 2016;571:730-736.
- 2. Tiryaki O, Canhilal R, Horuz S. Use and risks of agricultural chemicals. J Inst Sci Technol Erciyes Univ 2010;26(2):154-169.
- 3. General Directorate of Occupational Health and Safety. Selection of personal protective equipment in pesticide work. Ankara: Ministry of Labor and Social Security; 2020.
- 4. Ayaz D, Öncel S. Effects of agricultural chemicals on the environment and human health and public health nursing. In: Public Health Nursing in Creating a Healthy and Safe Environment. 1st ed. Ankara: Turkey Clinics; 2022. p.66-75.
- 5. Yarpuz-Bozdogan N. The importance of personal protective equipment in pesticide applications in agriculture. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018;4:1-4.
- 6. Bördlein C. Behavioral safety for culture change. Jpn J Ergon 2022;58(Suppl):S171-02.
- 7. Wilson C, Tisdell C. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health, and sustainability costs. Ecol Econ 2001;39(3):449-462.
- 8. Skevas T, Oude Lansink A. Reducing pesticide use and pesticide impact by productivity growth: the case of Dutch arable farming. J Agric Econ 2014;65(1):191-211.
- 9. FAO, WHO. Guidelines for personal protection when handling and applying pesticides - International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management. In: FAO [online]. Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca5705en/CA5705EN.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2024.
- 10. Tama RAZ, Ying L, Mark MY, Hoque MM, Adnan KM, Sarker SA. Assessing farmers’ intention towards conservation agriculture by using the extended theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manage 2021;280:111654. 11. Savari M, Gharechaee H. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. J Clean Prod 2020;263:121512.