Research Article

Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey?

Volume: 20 Number: 2 August 5, 2022
Can Hüseyin Hekimoğlu *, Selda Sahan , Esen Batır , Emine Yıldırım Gozel , Dilek Altun , Gulen Pehlıvanturk , Muhammet Comce , Fatih Kara
TR EN

Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey?

Abstract

Objective: Standardized infection ratio (SIR) for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) has been calculated using formulas obtained from the national models in Turkey since 2016. we aimed to evaluate the current usability of the national models by using 2020 data and whether the models need to be updated. Methods: The database used for The National HAI Surveillance Network Summary Report 2020 was used for remodelling. For each type of infection, remodeling was performed with 2020 data using the variables in the national models. The number of CLABSIs, CAUTIs and VAPs was the dependent variable for each negative binomial model with a logarithmic link function. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) from the repeated models were compared with the national models using 95% confidence intervals. Results: In each model, all variables in the national models were again statistically significant (ps<0.05). Although the IRRs were similar for most of the risk factors, the size of the risk for some of them changed significantly between the national models and our models. In the national VAP and CAUTI model, the reference category for hospital type was private hospitals, while in our models, it was state hospitals. In addition, the IRRs for CAUTI in state hospitals, training and research hospitals and university hospitals were significantly lower than in the national model. Conclusion: It is necessary to update the coefficients used in the calculation of the predicted infection numbers in the SIR formulas, especially for VAP and CAUTI.

Keywords

central line-associated bloodstream infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infection

Thanks

The authors thank to all infection control nurses and physicians in all hospitals in Turkey for providing these data.

References

  1. Infection Control Regulation of Inpatient Treatment Institutions. Official Gazette (Issue: 25903). (In Turkish).
  2. Turkish General Directorate of Public Health. The national healthcare-associated infections surveillance standards 2017. (In Turkish) Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/hastaliklar/SHIE/Klavuzlar/Ulusal_Saglik_Hizmeti_Iliskili_Enfeksiyonlar_Surveyans_Standartlari_2017.pdf
  3. Turkish General Directorate of Public Health. The national healthcare-associated infections surveillance guideline 2017. (In Turkish) Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/hastaliklar/SHIE/Klavuzlar/Ulusal_Saglik_Hizmeti_Iliskili_Enfeksiyonlar_Surveyans_Rehber Versiyon_1.pdf
  4. Hekimoglu CH , Alp Mese E . The adjusted standardized infection ratio and cumulative attributable difference for central line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections in 2017, in Turkey. J Immunol Clin Microbiol 2020;5(1): 41-49.
  5. Gozel MG, Hekimoglu CH, Gozel EY, Batir E, McLaws ML, Alp Mese E. National Infection Control Program in Turkey: The healthcare associated infection rate experiences over 10 years. Am J Infect Control 2021;49(7):885-892.
  6. Refik Saydam Hygiene Center Presidency. The national nosocomial infections surveillance network (UHESA) report, Summary data, 2008-2009. (In Turkish) Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/hastaliklar/SHIE/Raporlar/UHESA_Ozet_Raporu_2008_-_2009.pdf
  7. Turkish General Directorate of Public Health. The summary report of standardized infection ratio and cumulative attributable difference for invasive device-associated infections in intensive care units in Turkey, 2016. (In Turkish) Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/hastaliklar/SHIE/Raporlar/Standardize_Enfeksiyon_Orani_SIR_ve_Kumulatif_Atfedilebilir_Fark_CAD_Raporu_2016.pdf
  8. Turkish General Directorate of Public Health. The summary report of standardized utilization ratio in intensive care units in Turkey, 2017. (In Turkish) Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/hastaliklar/SHIE/Raporlar/Standardize_Arac_Kullanim_Orani_SAKO_Raporu_2017.pdf
  9. Hacimustafaoglu M. Standardized infection ratio (SIR). J Pediatr Inf 2019;13(2):121-123. (In Turkish)
  10. Kaya Kalem A, Guner R, Kayaaslan B, Hasanoğlu I. Invasive Device-related Infections and Standardized Infection Ratios in an Training and Research Hospital Intensive Care Units. Flora 2020; 25(2):228-235. (In Turkish)
APA
Hekimoğlu, C. H., Sahan, S., Batır, E., Yıldırım Gozel, E., Altun, D., Pehlıvanturk, G., Comce, M., & Kara, F. (2022). Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey? Turkish Journal of Public Health, 20(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.989565
AMA
1.Hekimoğlu CH, Sahan S, Batır E, et al. Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey? TJPH. 2022;20(2):177-185. doi:10.20518/tjph.989565
Chicago
Hekimoğlu, Can Hüseyin, Selda Sahan, Esen Batır, et al. 2022. “Standardized Infection Ratio: Can We Still Reliably Use the National Invasive Device- Associated Infection Models in Intensive Care Units in Turkey?”. Turkish Journal of Public Health 20 (2): 177-85. https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.989565.
EndNote
Hekimoğlu CH, Sahan S, Batır E, Yıldırım Gozel E, Altun D, Pehlıvanturk G, Comce M, Kara F (August 1, 2022) Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey? Turkish Journal of Public Health 20 2 177–185.
IEEE
[1]C. H. Hekimoğlu et al., “Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey?”, TJPH, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 177–185, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.20518/tjph.989565.
ISNAD
Hekimoğlu, Can Hüseyin - Sahan, Selda - Batır, Esen - Yıldırım Gozel, Emine - Altun, Dilek - Pehlıvanturk, Gulen - Comce, Muhammet - Kara, Fatih. “Standardized Infection Ratio: Can We Still Reliably Use the National Invasive Device- Associated Infection Models in Intensive Care Units in Turkey?”. Turkish Journal of Public Health 20/2 (August 1, 2022): 177-185. https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.989565.
JAMA
1.Hekimoğlu CH, Sahan S, Batır E, Yıldırım Gozel E, Altun D, Pehlıvanturk G, Comce M, Kara F. Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey? TJPH. 2022;20:177–185.
MLA
Hekimoğlu, Can Hüseyin, et al. “Standardized Infection Ratio: Can We Still Reliably Use the National Invasive Device- Associated Infection Models in Intensive Care Units in Turkey?”. Turkish Journal of Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, Aug. 2022, pp. 177-85, doi:10.20518/tjph.989565.
Vancouver
1.Can Hüseyin Hekimoğlu, Selda Sahan, Esen Batır, Emine Yıldırım Gozel, Dilek Altun, Gulen Pehlıvanturk, Muhammet Comce, Fatih Kara. Standardized infection ratio: Can we still reliably use the national invasive device- associated infection models in intensive care units in Turkey? TJPH. 2022 Aug. 1;20(2):177-85. doi:10.20518/tjph.989565